IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/ep2a6_v1.html

Henry George and Clark's Paradigm

Author

Listed:
  • Charlier, Niels
  • Tideman, Nicolaus

Abstract

We begin this essay with an analysis of the criticism of orthodox economics from a philosophy of science and methodological point of view. Rather than idealized models, a careless definition of ”capital” appears to be the problem. We owe this careless definition to John Bates Clark (1847–1938). Clark introduced a new paradigm that proposed that land is not a separate factor of production, but only a form of capital. His theory was a reaction to the American economist and philosopher Henry George (1839–1879) who sold millions of books and was exceptionally popular. George advocated a substantial land value tax and influenced political debate for several decades in the Anglo-Saxon world and elsewhere. We sketch George’s ideas in their historical context and give an overview of his unappreciated impact on global scientific, political and cultural history. Finally, we also show George’s relevance in today’s world and provide a scientific and social critique of the Clark paradigm.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlier, Niels & Tideman, Nicolaus, 2025. "Henry George and Clark's Paradigm," SocArXiv ep2a6_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:ep2a6_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/ep2a6_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/689f85b51acc207b12592fc7/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/ep2a6_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Piketty, 2013. "Le capital au XXIe siècle," Post-Print halshs-00979232, HAL.
    2. Jacques-François Thisse, 2011. "Geographical Economics: A Historical Perspective," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 77(2), pages 141-168.
    3. Warren J. Samuels, 2003. "Why the Georgist Movement Has Not Succeeded:," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 583-592, July.
    4. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1977. "The Theory of Local Public Goods," International Economic Association Series, in: Martin S. Feldstein & Robert P. Inman (ed.), The Economics of Public Services, chapter 12, pages 274-333, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Robert F. H´bert, 2003. "4 Marshall: A Professional Economist Guards the Purity of His Discipline," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(5), pages 61-82, November.
    6. Backhaus, Jürgen G., 1991. "Henry George and the Environment," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 90-98, April.
    7. John Whitaker, 2001. "Henry George and Classical Growth Theory: A Significant Contribution to Modeling Scale Economies," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 11-24, January.
    8. Mason Gaffney, 2009. "The hidden taxable capacity of land: enough and to spare," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(4), pages 328-411, March.
    9. Mark Blaug, 2000. "Henry George: rebel with a cause," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 270-288.
    10. Terence M. Dwyer, 1982. "Henry George's Thought in Relation to Modern Economics," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 363-373, October.
    11. Daniel S. Hamermesh, 2013. "Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who and How?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 51(1), pages 162-172, March.
    12. Niman, Neil B., 2010. "Henry George And The Development Of Thorstein Veblen’S Theory Of Capital," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(3), pages 419-431, September.
    13. John Hudson, 2017. "Identifying economics’ place amongst academic disciplines: a science or a social science?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 735-750, November.
    14. Czech, Brian, 2009. "The neoclassical production function as a relic of anti-George politics: Implications for ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(8-9), pages 2193-2197, June.
    15. Stefan Homburg, 2015. "Critical remarks on Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-first Century," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(14), pages 1401-1406, March.
    16. Renato Cirillo, 1981. "The Influence of Auguste Walras on Léon Walras," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 309-316, July.
    17. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2015. "The Origins of Inequality, and Policies to Contain It," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 68(2), pages 425-448, June.
    18. Christopher England, 2018. "John Dewey and Henry George: The Socialization of Land as a Prerequisite for a Democratic Public," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(1), pages 169-200, January.
    19. Robert V. Andelson, 2001. "Henry George's Land Reform: A Comment on Pullen," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 581-585, April.
    20. repec:ejw:journl:v:12:y:2015:i:2:p:192-220 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. John Haynes Holmes, 1947. "Henry George and Karl Marx A Plutarchian Experiment," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(2), pages 159-168, January.
    22. Katia Caldari & Fabio Masini, 2011. "Pigouvian versus Marshallian tax: market failure, public intervention and the problem of externalities," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 715-732, December.
    23. Mason Gaffney, 2009. "The hidden taxable capacity of land: enough and to spare," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(4), pages 328-411, March.
    24. Michael Hudson, 2008. "Henry George's Political Critics," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(1), pages 1-45, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2021. "Making markets just: Reciprocity violations as key intervention points," ZOE Discussion Papers 7, ZOE. institute for future-fit economies, Bonn.
    2. John Gibson, 2021. "The micro‐geography of academic research: How distinctive is economics?," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 68(4), pages 467-484, September.
    3. Ünsal Özdilek, 2025. "From Soil to Servers: Persistent Neglect of Land Resources and Its Looming Repetition for Users in the Digital Age," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Max Franks & David Klenert & Anselm Schultes & Kai Lessmann & Ottmar Edenhofer, 2018. "Is capital back? The role of land ownership and savings behavior," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(5), pages 1252-1276, October.
    5. Nicolas Brisset & Benoît Walraevens, 2021. "From capital to property: History and justice in the work of Thomas Piketty [Du capital à la propriété: Histoire et justice dans le travail de Thomas Piketty]," Post-Print hal-03250042, HAL.
    6. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2019. "Growth imperatives: Substantiating a contested concept," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 126-137.
    7. Laura Wolf-Powers, 2024. "Dilemmas of 21st century land value capture: Examining Henry George’s legacy in a new Gilded Age," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(6), pages 1738-1752, September.
    8. Dirk Löhr & Norbert Olah & Thomas Huth, 2021. "Boden, der vergessene Produktionsfaktor [Land, the Forgotten Factor of Production]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(3), pages 221-226, March.
    9. Oliver Richters & Andreas Siemoneit, 2018. "The contested concept of growth imperatives: Technology and the fear of stagnation," Working Papers V-414-18, University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics, revised Nov 2018.
    10. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2019. "Marktwirtschaft reparieren: Entwurf einer freiheitlichen, gerechten und nachhaltigen Utopie," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 213814.
    11. Ottmar Edenhofer & Linus Mattauch & Jan Siegmeier, 2013. "Hypergeorgism: When is Rent Taxation as a Remedy for Insufficient Capital Accumulation Socially Optimal?," CESifo Working Paper Series 4144, CESifo.
    12. Léleng Kebalo & Hamitande Dout & Mawuli K. Couchoro & Stéphane Zouri, 2022. "Intégration – commerciale, budgétaire, financière – régionale et inégalités de revenu dans la Communauté Economique des Etats de l'Afrique de l'Ouest (CEDEAO)," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 34(S1), pages 102-116, July.
    13. Acocella Nicola & Di Bartolomeo Giovanni, 2013. "Population location, commuting and local public goods: A political economy approach," wp.comunite 0105, Department of Communication, University of Teramo.
    14. Estrada, Fernando, 2015. "Antinomies de Le Capital au XXIe siècle [Antinomies of Capital in the 21st Century]," MPRA Paper 61126, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Komlos, John & Schubert, Hermann, 2019. "Les origines du triomphe de Donald Trump," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 26.
    16. Kevin Pineda‐Hernández & François Rycx & Mélanie Volral, 2022. "How collective bargaining shapes poverty: New evidence for developed countries," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(4), pages 895-928, December.
    17. Claudia Kettner-Marx & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig, 2018. "Carbon Taxes from an Economic Perspective," WIFO Working Papers 554, WIFO.
    18. Pedro Carneiro & Sokbae Lee & Daniel Wilhelm, 2020. "Optimal data collection for randomized control trials," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 23(1), pages 1-31.
    19. Arjan Lejour & Harrie Verbon, 1997. "Tax Competition and Redistribution in a Two-Country Endogenous-Growth Model," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 4(4), pages 485-497, November.
    20. Julia, Knolle, 2014. "An Empirical Comparison of Interest and Growth Rates," MPRA Paper 59520, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:ep2a6_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.