IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/bz8jv_v1.html

Domestic Peace Deficit: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Gender-Based Violence through Institutional, Relational, and Structural Peace Failures

Author

Listed:
  • Ezeukwu, Ijeoma

Abstract

Gender-based violence (GBV) continues to persist at high levels despite decades of legal reform, policy intervention, and scholarly attention. Existing approaches, drawn from criminology, public health, sociology, psychology, and law, have generated important insights into individual acts, risk factors, and immediate responses. Yet they remain less equipped to explain the cumulative institutional conditions that allow harm within domestic and intimate life to endure across the life course. This paper introduces the Domestic Peace Deficit (DPD) as a conceptual framework that addresses this gap. DPD explains how cumulative institutional failures undermine peace within domestic life by shaping exposure to violence, access to protection, and recognition of harm. Its central contribution is to treat the household as a peace system rather than merely a private social space or a site of interpersonal violence. Drawing on and extending insights from structural violence, positive peace, feminist peace research, human security, the ecological model of GBV, and intersectionality, the framework organises analysis around three pillars: the Violence and Coercion Deficit, the Agency and Relational Peace Deficit, and the Institutional and Structural Support Deficit. The paper defines domestic peace, formalises the deficit concept, outlines core principles, describes how the framework was developed, sketches pathways of accumulation, a future measurement agenda, and states the framework's principal limitations. DPD does not replace existing theories; it integrates and extends them into a coherent architecture centred on the domestic sphere. In doing so, it offers researchers, policymakers, and practitioners a tool for understanding why formal protections so often fail to produce lived safety, and for designing responses that address institutional recognition, accountability, and the intergenerational transmission of harm.

Suggested Citation

  • Ezeukwu, Ijeoma, 2026. "Domestic Peace Deficit: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Gender-Based Violence through Institutional, Relational, and Structural Peace Failures," SocArXiv bz8jv_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:bz8jv_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/bz8jv_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a85b70a82e9d352616a8971/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/bz8jv_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. True, Jacqui, 2012. "The Political Economy of Violence against Women," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199755912.
    2. Naila Kabeer, 1999. "Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women's Empowerment," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 30(3), pages 435-464, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ezeukwu, Ijeoma, 2026. "Closing The Domestic Peace Gap Applying the Domestic Peace Deficit Framework to SDG 5, SDG 16, and the Women, Peace and Security Agenda," SocArXiv 9f4js_v1, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-8:p:7617-7625 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Helen M. Haugh & Alka Talwar, 2016. "Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 643-658, February.
    3. Rao, Nitya, 2017. "Assets, Agency and Legitimacy: Towards a Relational Understanding of Gender Equality Policy and Practice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 43-54.
    4. Kathryn M Yount & Agnes Quisumbing & Ruth Meinzen-Dick & Hazel Malapit & Md Zahidul Hassan & Shelton S E Kanyanda & Sudhindra Sharma & Md Imrul Hassan & Jessica Heckert & Flor Paz & Pankaj Pokhrel & W, 2026. "Women’s Empowerment Metric for National Statistical Systems (WEMNS): Development and psychometric assessment of a face-to-face survey module," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-27, May.
    5. DeJaeghere, Joan & Pellowski Wiger, Nancy & Le, Hue & Luong, Phuong & Ngo, Nga Thi Hang & Vu, Thanh Thi & Lee, Jongwook, 2022. "Why do aspirations matter for empowerment?: Discrepancies between the A-WEAI domains and aspirations of ethnic minority women in Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. K. Gayathri Reddy & Varsha, P. S. & L. N. Sudheendra Rao & Amit Kumar, 2019. "Exploring dimension, perceived individual tension and capacity building measure of women empowerment in India," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(5), pages 111-131, May.
    7. Alice W Clark & T V Sekher, 2007. "Can Career-Minded Young Women Reverse Gender Discrimination?," Working Papers 179, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore.
    8. Gaurav Dhamija & Punarjit Roychowdhury & Binay Shankar, 2025. "Does urbanization empower women? Evidence from India," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 38(1), pages 1-47, March.
    9. chatterjee, susmita, 2017. "Empowerment translated to transition," MPRA Paper 80067, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Alkire, Sabina & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth & Peterman, Amber & Quisumbing, Agnes & Seymour, Greg & Vaz, Ana, 2013. "The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 71-91.
    11. Bussolo, Maurizio & Ezebuihe, Jessy Amarachi & Munoz Boudet, Ana Maria & Poupakis, Stavros & Rahman, Tasmia & Sarma, Nayantara, 2022. "Social Norms and Gender Equality : A Descriptive Analysis for South Asia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10142, The World Bank.
    12. Shreya Biswas & Upasak Das & Prasenjit Sarkhel, 2024. "Duration of exposure to inheritance law in India: Examining the heterogeneous effects on empowerment," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 777-799, May.
    13. Rania Salem & Yuk Fai Cheong & Kathryn M. Yount, 2018. "Is Women’s Work a Pathway to their Agency in Rural Minya, Egypt?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 807-831, April.
    14. Alice Tianbo Zhang & Sasmita Patnaik & Shaily Jha & Shalu Agrawal & Carlos F. Gould & Johannes Urpelainen, 2022. "Evidence of multidimensional gender inequality in energy services from a large-scale household survey in India," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 698-707, August.
    15. Amjad Ali & Marc Audi & Chan Bibi & Yannick Roussel, 2021. "The Impact of Gender Inequality and Environmental Degradation on Human Well-being in the Case of Pakistan: A Time Series Analysis," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, vol. 11(2), pages 92-99.
    16. Lone Badstue & Patti Petesch & Cathy Rozel Farnworth & Lara Roeven & Mahlet Hailemariam, 2020. "Women Farmers and Agricultural Innovation: Marital Status and Normative Expectations in Rural Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, November.
    17. O'Hara, Corey & Clement, Floriane, 2018. "Power as agency: A critical reflection on the measurement of women’s empowerment in the development sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 111-123.
    18. Bhukta, Rikhia & Pakrashi, Debayan & Saha, Sarani & Sedai, Ashish, 2024. "Community electrification and women’s autonomy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    19. Lilian Miles, 2016. "The Social Relations Approach, empowerment and women factory workers in Malaysia," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 37(1), pages 3-22, February.
    20. Wole Kinati & Elizabeth C. Temple & Derek Baker & Dina Najjar & Reta Hailu, 2024. "Understanding Agency Within Context: The Case of Breeding Cooperatives Program for Transforming Small Ruminant Value Chain in Ethiopia," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, April.
    21. Rao, Nitya & Singh, Chandni & Solomon, Divya & Camfield, Laura & Sidiki, Rahina & Angula, Margaret & Poonacha, Prathigna & Sidibé, Amadou & Lawson, Elaine T., 2020. "Managing risk, changing aspirations and household dynamics: Implications for wellbeing and adaptation in semi-arid Africa and India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:bz8jv_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.