IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0345742.html

Women’s Empowerment Metric for National Statistical Systems (WEMNS): Development and psychometric assessment of a face-to-face survey module

Author

Listed:
  • Kathryn M Yount
  • Agnes Quisumbing
  • Ruth Meinzen-Dick
  • Hazel Malapit
  • Md Zahidul Hassan
  • Shelton S E Kanyanda
  • Sudhindra Sharma
  • Md Imrul Hassan
  • Jessica Heckert
  • Flor Paz
  • Pankaj Pokhrel
  • Wilbert D Vundru
  • Cheryl Doss
  • Greg Seymour
  • Heather Moylan
  • Talip Kilic
  • Emily Myers
  • Simone Faas
  • Yuk Fai Cheong
  • Sheela S Sinharoy

Abstract

Data to monitor progress towards gender-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) remain limited. A comprehensive, concise set of metrics is needed for routine national data collection to monitor progress toward these goals. Our team developed and tested the Women’s Empowerment Metric for National Statistical Systems (WEMNS) survey module for use by national statistical offices and survey organizations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to measure women’s and men’s empowerment. This paper summarizes the process of developing the WEMNS module and presents detailed results of a psychometric assessment of face-to-face surveys in Bangladesh, Malawi, and Nepal. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in the pooled sample confirmed that most of the 13 item sets had adequately identified factor structures aligned with specific empowerment constructs and gender-related SDGs. In multi-group CFA assessing measurement equivalence of item sets across gender and countries, configural invariance was observed for 9 of 13 item sets across genders and across country settings. At least partial scalar invariance was observed for one item set across genders and no item sets across country settings. Spearman pairwise correlations among WEMNS factor scores derived from final CFA models showed weak associations, suggesting item sets were weakly related and distinct. Overall, Spearman pairwise correlations of 13 WEMNS-derived factor scores with external measures for basic needs, resources, agency, and subjective well-being were weak, but five moderately high correlations were conceptually aligned. In sum, the WEMNS measures require refinement and further psychometric assessment to confirm their use to make valid comparisons of empowerment across country settings and gender.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathryn M Yount & Agnes Quisumbing & Ruth Meinzen-Dick & Hazel Malapit & Md Zahidul Hassan & Shelton S E Kanyanda & Sudhindra Sharma & Md Imrul Hassan & Jessica Heckert & Flor Paz & Pankaj Pokhrel & W, 2026. "Women’s Empowerment Metric for National Statistical Systems (WEMNS): Development and psychometric assessment of a face-to-face survey module," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-27, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345742
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345742
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345742&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0345742?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.