IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/9epsy_v1.html

Empirical Verification of an Asset Dynamics Model in Open Economies: An Equilibrium Theory Endogenizing Imbalances Bridging Steady-State Conditions and Social Adaptation

Author

Listed:
  • Kitamura, Kazuhito

Abstract

The general equilibrium theory, upon which mainstream modern macroeconomics relies, fails to adequately explain the realities enveloping the contemporary economy, including persistent global imbalances. In contrast, our previous studies (Kitamura, 2025, 2026) have proposed a theoretical model based on "asset dynamics" that conceptualizes the global economy as a dissipative structure woven by the concentration and diffusion of funds, understanding it as an "equilibrium theory endogenizing imbalances" where economies, each harboring its own imbalances, maintain a balance by compensating for each other's surpluses and deficits. This paper statistically verifies the empirical validity of this theoretical framework using multi-source macroeconomic data and socio-psychological indicators. Targeting approximately 80 countries for which data are available, we redefine a socio-psychological indicator based on a large-scale international survey regarding time value, patience, and other attributes, as a proxy for the divergence between the real interest rate and the time preference rate—which constitutes one side of the steady-state condition derived from the theoretical model. Conducting a regression analysis using the structural terms that constitute the right-hand side of the conditional equation, namely population changes, capital movement, and asset preference, we obtained statistically significant results, including the sign conditions. Furthermore, by utilizing these estimation results, we visualized the dissipative structure that weaves the global economy, rendering the contrasting positions and interdependence of the two major economic superpowers as data-driven facts, such as the United States as a self-organizing economy and China as a dissipative economy. The contributions of this paper provide an empirical foundation for a new macroeconomic paradigm that reframes imbalances not as an undesirable state to be eliminated, but endogenously explains them as the energy required for the global economic system to maintain its vitality.

Suggested Citation

  • Kitamura, Kazuhito, 2026. "Empirical Verification of an Asset Dynamics Model in Open Economies: An Equilibrium Theory Endogenizing Imbalances Bridging Steady-State Conditions and Social Adaptation," SocArXiv 9epsy_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:9epsy_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/9epsy_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a26ba7a61a8b484cf8672ed/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/9epsy_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armin Falk & Anke Becker & Thomas Dohmen & Benjamin Enke & David Huffman & Uwe Sunde, 2018. "Global Evidence on Economic Preferences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(4), pages 1645-1692.
    2. Kitamura, Kazuhito, 2026. "Asset Dynamics and Dissipative Structures in Open Economies: Economics as a Prescription for the "Thermal Death" of Equilibrium," MPRA Paper 127971, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Obstfeld, Maurice & Rogoff, Kenneth, 1995. "The intertemporal approach to the current account," Handbook of International Economics, in: G. M. Grossman & K. Rogoff (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 34, pages 1731-1799, Elsevier.
    4. Martin Guzman & Joseph E Stiglitz, 2020. "Towards a dynamic disequilibrium theory with randomness," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 621-674.
    5. Armin Falk & Anke Becker & Thomas Dohmen & Benjamin Enke & David B. Huffman & Uwe Sunde, 2017. "Global Evidence on Economic Preferences," NBER Working Papers 23943, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Per Krusell & Anthony A. Smith & Jr., 1998. "Income and Wealth Heterogeneity in the Macroeconomy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 106(5), pages 867-896, October.
    7. David Laibson, 1997. "Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(2), pages 443-478.
    8. Kitamura, Kazuhito, 2025. "Persistent Imbalances in Open Economies: Reconsidering Equilibrium via Asset‑Dynamics," MPRA Paper 126667, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Victor M. Yakovenko & J. Barkley Rosser, 2009. "Colloquium: Statistical mechanics of money, wealth, and income," Papers 0905.1518, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2009.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Epper & Ernst Fehr & Helga Fehr-Duda & Claus Thustrup Kreiner & David Dreyer Lassen & Søren Leth-Petersen & Gregers Nytoft Rasmussen, 2020. "Time Discounting and Wealth Inequality," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(4), pages 1177-1205, April.
    2. Brenøe, Anne Ardila & Epper, Thomas, 2022. "Parenting values and the intergenerational transmission of time preferences," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Andrej Gill & Florian Hett & Johannes Tischer, 2022. "Time Inconsistency and Overdraft Use: Evidence from Transaction Data and Behavioral Measurement Experiments," Working Papers 2205, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    4. Erdem, Orhan & Ashok, Ragavi Pobbathi, 2026. "LLMs are not weird: Comparing AI and human financial decision-making," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    5. Alexandre Cunha & Guilherme Gallego & Marcelo Santos & Bernardus Van Doornik, 2026. "Labor Market Effects of Unemployment Insurance and UBI in Developing Economies," Working Papers Series 646, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    6. Huong Trang Kim & Quang Nguyen, 2024. "Linking top managers’ behavioural traits with business practices and firm performance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(11), pages 3253-3296, November.
    7. Hardardottir, Hjördis, 2019. "Many Balls in the Air Make Time Fly: The Effect of Multitasking on Time Perception and Time Preferences," Working Papers 2019:11, Lund University, Department of Economics, revised 17 Sep 2019.
    8. Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. & Dahmann, Sarah C. & Kamhöfer, Daniel A. & Schildberg-Hörisch, Hannah, 2022. "The Determinants of Population Self-Control," IZA Discussion Papers 15175, IZA Network @ LISER.
    9. Kopsacheilis, Orestis & Goerg, Sebastian J., 2023. "Order Effects in Eliciting Preferences," IZA Discussion Papers 16343, IZA Network @ LISER.
    10. S. Basiglio & A. Ricci & M. Rossi, 2025. "Entrepreneurs’ impatience and digital technologies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(4), pages 2035-2060, April.
    11. Preuss, Malte, 2021. "Intra-individual stability of two survey measures on forward-looking attitude," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 201-227.
    12. Sébastien Duchêne & Marlène Guillon & Ismaël Rafaï, 2024. "Association between mindfulness and risk and time preferences," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 10(2), pages 199-212, December.
    13. Cobb-Clark, Deborah & Silva Goncalves, Juliana & Tymula, Agnieszka & Wang, Xueting, 2026. "The Conceptual Foundations of Self-Control and its Link to Impulsivity and Attention," IZA Discussion Papers 18646, IZA Network @ LISER.
    14. Julia Ihli, Hanna & Chiputwa, Brian & Winter, Etti & Gassner, Anja, 2022. "Risk and time preferences for participating in forest landscape restoration: The case of coffee farmers in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    15. Werthschulte, Madeline & Löschel, Andreas, 2021. "On the role of present bias and biased price beliefs in household energy consumption," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    16. Cheng, Lingguo & Lu, Yunfeng, 2024. "Does retirement make people more risk averse?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 135-155.
    17. Zhang, Yanan & Li, Jianbiao & Cao, Qian & Niu, Xiaofei, 2024. "Institutional quarantine and economic preferences: Experimental evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    18. Edina Berlinger & Sára Khayouti & Hubert János Kiss, 2022. "Time discounting predicts loan forbearance takeup," KRTK-KTI WORKING PAPERS 2201, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    19. Joshua Tasoff & Wenjie Zhang, 2022. "The Performance of Time-Preference and Risk-Preference Measures in Surveys," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1149-1173, February.
    20. Cédric Gutierrez & Randolph Sloof & Donal Crilly, 2024. "Time Is Not Money! Temporal Preferences for Time Investments and Entry into Entrepreneurship," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 622-643, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:9epsy_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.