IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/xrhdy_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Growth in the Worldwide Stock of E-Mobility Vehicles (by Technology and by Transport Mode) and the Worldwide Stock of Hydrogen Refueling Stations and Electric Charging Points between 2020 and 2022

Author

Listed:
  • Marzouk, Osama A.

Abstract

This study discusses the portion of fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) in the worldwide stock of vehicles on roads, particularly when compared to plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs), which comprise battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs). The study considers the overall number of these e-mobility (electric mobility) vehicles, as well as within each of 4 transport modes, namely: (1) passenger light-duty vehicles (PLDVs or simply “cars”), (2) light commercial vehicles (LCVs or simply “vans”), (3) buses, and (4) trucks. The study also investigates the progress in the number of hydrogen refueling stations (HRSs) for FCEVs, and contrasts that with electric charging points (ECPs) for PEVs; during the years 2020, 2021, and 2022. While the number of worldwide FCEVs nearly doubled in 2022 compared to 2020, the ratio of FCEVs to PEVs declined from 0.3348% in 2020 to 0.2738% (less than 0.3%) in 2022. In 2022 also, the number of FCEVs was 0.3914% (less than 0.4%) of the number of BEVs, and 0.9113% (less than 1%) of the number of PHEVs. The worldwide fraction of PEVs with respect to the total vehicles (both electric and non-electric) in 2022 was approximately 1.816% (split into 1.2704% for BEVs and 0.5456% for PHEVs), while the fraction of FCEVs was approximately 0.0050% (only 5 FCEVs per 100,000 vehicles). In terms of the convenience to supply the vehicles with energy, the number of worldwide hydrogen refueling stations nearly doubled in 2022 compared to 2020. Similarly, the worldwide number of electric charging points for use with PEVs nearly doubled in 2022 compared to 2020. However, the ratio of HRSs to ECPs declined from 0.0415% in 2020 to 0.0378% in 2022. The worldwide average FCEVs per HRS in 2022 was 70.69, while the worldwide average PEVs per ECP in 2022 was 9.75. Thus, PEVs are much more attractive than FCEVs for a driver concerned about the network of hydrogen stations. Furthermore, owners of PEVs have an additional option of recharging their vehicles at home (which is not applicable for FCEVs). Between 2020 and 2022, PEVs were dominated by BEVs, with 69.95% of PEVs being BEVs in 2022. This 2022 fraction of BEVs in PEVs reflects a consistent increase from the 2021 fraction (68.34%) and from the 2020 fraction (67.23%). Considering the worldwide increase in these e-mobility vehicles from 2020 to 2022, the number of FCEVs increased by a factor of 2.072, PHEVs increased by a factor of 2.322, and BEVs increased by a factor of 2.636, PEVs increased by a factor of 2.533. Thus, out of the 3 e-mobility vehicle technologies (FCEVs, PHEVs, and BEVs), BEVs had the strongest presence as well as the fastest growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Marzouk, Osama A., 2023. "Growth in the Worldwide Stock of E-Mobility Vehicles (by Technology and by Transport Mode) and the Worldwide Stock of Hydrogen Refueling Stations and Electric Charging Points between 2020 and 2022," OSF Preprints xrhdy_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:xrhdy_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/xrhdy_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/67e17ab66b2c3f2cf7496e3e/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/xrhdy_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Anni & Liu, Chenhui & Yang, Di & Lu, Chaoru, 2023. "Electric vehicle adoption in a mature market: A case study of Norway," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    2. Lin, Zhenhong & Ou, Shiqi & Elgowainy, Amgad & Reddi, Krishna & Veenstra, Mike & Verduzco, Laura, 2018. "A method for determining the optimal delivered hydrogen pressure for fuel cell electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 183-194.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Chao & Liao, Mingzheng & Liang, Bo & Jiang, Zhiqiang & Zhong, Weilin & Chen, Ying & Luo, Xianglong & Shu, Riyang & Tian, Zhipeng & Lei, Libin, 2021. "Enhancement effect of catalyst support on indirect hydrogen production from propane partial oxidation towards commercial solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    2. Peng, Ruoqing & Tang, Justin Hayse Chiwing G. & Yang, Xiong & Meng, Meng & Zhang, Jie & Zhuge, Chengxiang, 2024. "Investigating the factors influencing the electric vehicle market share: A comparative study of the European Union and United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    3. Rosa, Carmen Brum & Francescatto, Matheus Binotto & Neuenfeldt Júnior, Alvaro Luiz & Bernardon, Daniel Pinheiro & dos Santos, Laura Lisiane Callai, 2023. "Regulatory analysis of E-mobility for Brazil: A comparative review and outlook," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. David W. Eby & Renée M. St. Louis & Jennifer S. Zakrajsek & Nicole Zanier, 2025. "Adoption and Use of Battery Electric Vehicles Among Older Drivers: A Review and Research Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Li, Jigang & Guo, Yanru & Jiang, Xiaojing & Li, Shuan & Li, Xingguo, 2020. "Hydrogen storage performances, kinetics and microstructure of Ti1.02Cr1.0Fe0.7-xMn0.3Alx alloy by Al substituting for Fe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1140-1154.
    6. Jiang, Zhiqiang & Liao, Mingzheng & Qi, Ji & Wang, Chao & Chen, Ying & Luo, Xianglong & Liang, Bo & Shu, Riyang & Song, Qingbin, 2020. "Enhancing hydrogen production from propane partial oxidation via CO preferential oxidation and CO2 sorption towards solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 303-313.
    7. Adrian Chmielewski & Piotr Piórkowski & Jakub Możaryn & Stepan Ozana, 2023. "Sustainable Development of Operational Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles: A Case Study for Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-43, June.
    8. Liao, Mingzheng & Chen, Ying & Cheng, Zhengdong & Wang, Chao & Luo, Xianglong & Bu, Enqi & Jiang, Zhiqiang & Liang, Bo & Shu, Riyang & Song, Qingbin, 2019. "Hydrogen production from partial oxidation of propane: Effect of SiC addition on Ni/Al2O3 catalyst," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Xiao, Runfeng & Tian, Gui & Hou, Yu & Chen, Shuangtao & Cheng, Cheng & Chen, Liang, 2020. "Effects of cooling-recovery venting on the performance of cryo-compressed hydrogen storage for automotive applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    10. Sun, Jie & Sun, Siying & Chen, Boli & Hu, Yukun, 2024. "Charging change: Analysing the UK's electric vehicle infrastructure policies and market dynamics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    11. Sagar Hossain & Md. Rokonuzzaman & Kazi Sajedur Rahman & A. K. M. Ahasan Habib & Wen-Shan Tan & Md Mahmud & Shahariar Chowdhury & Sittiporn Channumsin, 2023. "Grid-Vehicle-Grid (G2V2G) Efficient Power Transmission: An Overview of Concept, Operations, Benefits, Concerns, and Future Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, March.
    12. Nawei Liu & Fei Xie & Zhenhong Lin & Mingzhou Jin, 2020. "Evaluating national hydrogen refueling infrastructure requirement and economic competitiveness of fuel cell electric long-haul trucks," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 477-493, March.
    13. Pavlo Saik & Oleksii Cherniaiev & Oleh Anisimov & Kanay Rysbekov, 2023. "Substantiation of the Direction for Mining Operations That Develop under Conditions of Shear Processes Caused by Hydrostatic Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Qian, Jin-yuan & Chen, Min-rui & Gao, Zhi-xin & Jin, Zhi-jiang, 2019. "Mach number and energy loss analysis inside multi-stage Tesla valves for hydrogen decompression," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 647-654.
    15. Wen, Chuang & Rogie, Brice & Kærn, Martin Ryhl & Rothuizen, Erasmus, 2020. "A first study of the potential of integrating an ejector in hydrogen fuelling stations for fuelling high pressure hydrogen vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    16. Lahnaoui, Amin & Wulf, Christina & Heinrichs, Heidi & Dalmazzone, Didier, 2018. "Optimizing hydrogen transportation system for mobility by minimizing the cost of transportation via compressed gas truck in North Rhine-Westphalia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 317-328.
    17. Hao, Xu & Lin, Zhenhong & Wang, Hewu & Ou, Shiqi & Ouyang, Minggao, 2020. "Range cost-effectiveness of plug-in electric vehicle for heterogeneous consumers: An expanded total ownership cost approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    18. Osama A. Marzouk, 2024. "Portrait of the Decarbonization and Renewables Penetration in Oman’s Energy Mix, Motivated by Oman’s National Green Hydrogen Plan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-31, September.
    19. Tuydes-Yaman, Hediye & Dalkic-Melek, Gulcin & Chakarova, Kristiana & Ozcelik, Asli Sezer, 2024. "Barriers and opportunities (B&O) for developing low carbon transportation (LCT) policies in Turkey," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:xrhdy_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.