IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/tc5f3_v1.html

Quantile Structural Equation Modeling: Testing a Novel Spatially-Weighted Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shero, Jeffrey
  • Zhu, Zhixin
  • Thompson, Lee
  • Logan, Jessica A. R.

    (Vanderbilt University)

Abstract

Quantile-sensitive methodologies have gained traction in recent years, with researchers leveraging these approaches to conduct more in-depth analyses than are capable with traditional mean-centered approaches. These approaches have been used widely for regression and correlational-based approaches, finding evidence of heterogeneous effects based on the portion of the distribution analyzed. However, the methodologies for conducting quantile-sensitive work using more complex designs are limited, and extending this work into structural equation modeling (SEM) approaches was our primary aim. We conducted our study using a series of Monte-Carlo simulations, each representing data where SEM models with varying structures and values fit best depending on the portion of the distributions analyzed. A novel distance-based method (DSW), was developed and applied to the simulated datasets, observing its average and range of effectiveness to detect the heterogeneous SEM models and effects that underlie the datasets throughout their distributions. Two other methods were also tested, but have known limitations and instead were meant to serve as references for this approach, highlighting the advantages of the DSW method and the ways it addressed their limitations. Results found that the DSW approach was highly effective in detecting heterogeneous findings in regression models, latent growth curves, and factor-analytic models (both nested and non-nested models), accurately detecting the modeled differences in varying latent factor structures and other effect sizes and significantly outperforming the other approaches. Limitations and future directions for this work are discussed, highlighting the new areas of work this method opens up and its potential areas of extension.

Suggested Citation

  • Shero, Jeffrey & Zhu, Zhixin & Thompson, Lee & Logan, Jessica A. R., 2024. "Quantile Structural Equation Modeling: Testing a Novel Spatially-Weighted Approach," OSF Preprints tc5f3_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:tc5f3_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/tc5f3_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/66fb2cee3ad8ddad6b3cbcd9/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/tc5f3_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sergio Firpo & Nicole M. Fortin & Thomas Lemieux, 2009. "Unconditional Quantile Regressions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 953-973, May.
    2. Andreas Beyerlein & Rüdiger von Kries & Andrew R Ness & Ken K Ong, 2011. "Genetic Markers of Obesity Risk: Stronger Associations with Body Composition in Overweight Compared to Normal-Weight Children," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-4, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ying Liang, 2024. "Firms' Risk Adjustments to Minimum Wage: Financial Leverage and Labor Share Trade-off," Papers 2408.03659, arXiv.org.
    2. Korom, Philipp, 2016. "Inherited advantage: The importance of inheritance for private wealth accumulation in Europe," MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/11, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Joanna Tyrowicz & Lucas van der Velde, 2017. "When the opportunity knocks: large structural shocks and gender wage gaps," GRAPE Working Papers 2, GRAPE Group for Research in Applied Economics.
    4. Javier Alejo & Nicolás Badaracco, 2015. "Counterfactual Distributions in Bivariate Models—A Conditional Quantile Approach," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Michele Raitano & Francesco Vona & Claudia Vittori, 2015. "The effect of parental background along the son's earnings distribution : does one model fit for all?," Working Papers hal-03459749, HAL.
    6. Sanz-de-Galdeano, Anna & Terskaya, Anastasia, 2019. "Sibling Differences in Educational Polygenic Scores: How Do Parents React?," IZA Discussion Papers 12375, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Tiago Cavalcanti & Kamiar Mohaddes & Hongyu Nian & Haitao Yin, 2023. "Air pollution and firm-level human capital, knowledge and innovation," Working Papers EPRG2301, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    8. Corrado Andini, 2022. "Tertiary education for all and wage inequality: policy insights from quantile regression," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 50(6), pages 1281-1296, November.
    9. Wang, Zheng-Xin & Jv, Yue-Qi, 2023. "Revisiting income inequality among households: New evidence from the Chinese Household Income Project," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    10. Valentine Fays & Benoît Mahy & François Rycx, 2023. "Wage differences according to workers' origin: The role of working more upstream in GVCs," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 37(2), pages 319-342, June.
    11. Huong Thu Le & Ha Trong Nguyen, 2018. "The evolution of the gender test score gap through seventh grade: new insights from Australia using unconditional quantile regression and decomposition," IZA Journal of Labor Economics, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-42, December.
    12. Mario Reinhold, 2016. "On the Link between Job Polarisation and Wage Inequality - A regional approach for Germany," ERSA conference papers ersa16p361, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Holmes, Craig & Mayhew, Ken, 2015. "Have UK Earnings Distributions Polarised?," INET Oxford Working Papers 2015-02, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    14. Peter Fredriksson & Björn Öckert & Hessel Oosterbeek, 2013. "Long-Term Effects of Class Size," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 128(1), pages 249-285.
    15. Francis,David C. & Kubinec ,Robert, 2022. "Beyond Political Connections : A Measurement Model Approach to Estimating Firm-levelPolitical Influence in 41 Economies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10119, The World Bank.
    16. Sieds, 2017. "Complete Volume LXXI n. 3 2017," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 71(3), pages 1-150, July-Sept.
    17. Aprea, Massimo & Raitano, Michele, 2025. "Income inequality in times of high inflation in Europe," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 449-459.
    18. Xiaoying Liu & Jere R. Behrman & Emily Hannum & Fan Wang & Qingguo Zhao, 2022. "Same environment, stratified impacts? Air pollution, extreme temperatures, and birth weight in south China," Papers 2204.00219, arXiv.org.
    19. Juan Cruz Varvello & Jorge Camusso & Ana Inés Navarro, 2022. "Teletrabajo y distribución de ingresos laborales en Argentina," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4605, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    20. Hayden Stewart & Jeffrey Hyman & Diansheng Dong, 2015. "Menu Labeling Fills the Gaps in Consumers’ Knowledge of the Calorie Content of Restaurant Foods," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 491-506, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:tc5f3_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.