IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/amwy4.html

Algorithms and Professionals May Disagree On Companies’ Reputations

Author

Listed:
  • Lees, Jeffrey Martin

    (Clemson University)

Abstract

This work examines (dis)agreement between an algorithm and experienced professionals in their determinations of prominent companies’ reputations. 17 experienced professionals in the fields of reputation management, public relations, and CSR/ESG investing were asked to rate 25 companies across industries on eight dimensions of reputation (e.g., trust, social responsibility, exchange of benefits), yielding a total of 2,986 discrete reputational judgments. These ratings were on the same scale as an algorithm developed by a tech startup which uses real-time social media data to quantify the public reputation of companies, allowing for a direct examination of agreement between professionals and the algorithm. I found that professionals and the algorithm significantly disagreed on the reputation of the companies. When examined in tandem, the algorithm’s reputation ratings positively predicted market performance, while professionals’ reputation judgments negatively predicted market performance. The results contribute a detailed account of human-algorithm disagreement and the ways in which professionals’ subject reputational judgments may be at odds with algorithmic tools designed to quantify reputational information.

Suggested Citation

  • Lees, Jeffrey Martin, 2022. "Algorithms and Professionals May Disagree On Companies’ Reputations," OSF Preprints amwy4, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:amwy4
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/amwy4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/62b5dcd5ca817402c4ba2df1/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/amwy4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa M. Scheele & Ulrich W. Thonemann & Marco Slikker, 2018. "Designing Incentive Systems for Truthful Forecast Information Sharing Within a Firm," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3690-3713, August.
    2. Emiel Duuren & Auke Plantinga & Bert Scholtens, 2016. "ESG Integration and the Investment Management Process: Fundamental Investing Reinvented," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 525-533, October.
    3. Newman, David T. & Fast, Nathanael J. & Harmon, Derek J., 2020. "When eliminating bias isn’t fair: Algorithmic reductionism and procedural justice in human resource decisions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 149-167.
    4. Nofer, Michael & Hinz, Oliver, 2014. "Are Crowds on the Internet Wiser than Experts? The Case of a Stock Prediction Community," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 69935, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    5. Yuri Mishina & Emily S. Block & Michael J. Mannor, 2012. "The path dependence of organizational reputation: how social judgment influences assessments of capability and character," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 459-477, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:osfxxx:amwy4_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Rodrigo Zeidan, 2022. "Why don't asset managers accelerate ESG investing? A sentiment analysis based on 13,000 messages from finance professionals," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3028-3039, November.
    3. Ilze Zumente & Jūlija Bistrova, 2021. "Do Baltic investors care about environmental, social and governance (ESG)?," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(4), pages 349-362, June.
    4. Leon Zolotoy & Don O’Sullivan & Keke Song, 2021. "The Role of Ethical Standards in the Relationship Between Religious Social Norms and M&A Announcement Returns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 721-742, May.
    5. Michael Nippa & Sanjay Patnaik & Markus Taussig, 2021. "MNE responses to carbon pricing regulations: Theory and evidence," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(5), pages 904-929, July.
    6. Robert P. Ormrod & Annika C. Müller, 2022. "The Impact of Corporate Political Activity on Corporate Reputation Amongst Industry Stakeholders," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(3), pages 226-238, August.
    7. Kevin Money & Anastasiya Saraeva & Irene Garnelo-Gomez & Stephen Pain & Carola Hillenbrand, 2017. "Corporate Reputation Past and Future: A Review and Integration of Existing Literature and a Framework for Future Research," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 193-211, November.
    8. Bin Wang & Chenchen Wei & Longmei Shi & Xiaoqiang Cheng & Xueqin Shi, 2025. "ESG and firm operational efficiency: evidence from Chinese listed companies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 681-714, January.
    9. Basse, Tobias & Karmani, Majdi & Rjiba, Hatem & Wegener, Christoph, 2023. "Does adhering to the principles of green finance matter for stock valuation? Evidence from testing for (co-)explosiveness," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    10. Siliang Tong & Nan Jia & Xueming Luo & Zheng Fang, 2021. "The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(9), pages 1600-1631, September.
    11. Lorko, Matej & Servátka, Maroš & Zhang, Le, 2023. "Hidden inefficiency: Strategic inflation of project schedules," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 313-326.
    12. Pruthiranjan Dwibedi & Debasis Pahi & Antarjyami Sahu, 2024. "Mapping the landscape of environmental, social and governance research: A bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3745-3767, September.
    13. Mariconda, Simone & Lurati, Francesco, 2015. "Does familiarity breed stability? The role of familiarity in moderating the effects of new information on reputation judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 957-964.
    14. Šontaitė-Petkevičienė Miglė & Grigaliūnaitė Rūta, 2020. "The Use of Cause-Related Marketing to Build Good Corporate Reputation," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 83(1), pages 127-141, June.
    15. Maximilian Klöckner & Christoph G. Schmidt & Stephan M. Wagner, 2022. "When Blockchain Creates Shareholder Value: Empirical Evidence from International Firm Announcements," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 46-64, January.
    16. Vincenzo Pacelli & Francesca Pampurini & Anna Grazia Quaranta, 2023. "Environmental, Social and Governance investing: Does rating matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 30-41, January.
    17. Choi, Sunhwa & Yi, Youjae & Zhao, Xiaohong, 2024. "The human touch vs. AI efficiency: How perceived status, effort, and loyalty shape consumer satisfaction with preferential treatment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Emil Andersson & Mahim Hoque & Md Lutfur Rahman & Gazi Salah Uddin & Ranadeva Jayasekera, 2022. "ESG investment: What do we learn from its interaction with stock, currency and commodity markets?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3623-3639, July.
    19. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Ahmed, Syed Ishtiaque & Smolander, Kari, 2022. "What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    20. Tiago Cruz Gonçalves & Victor Barros & José Vicente Avelar, 2023. "Environmental, social and governance scores in Europe: what drives financial performance for larger firms?," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 121-131.
    21. Gök, Osman & Peker, Sinem & Hacioglu, Gungor, 2015. "The marketing department’s reputation in the firm," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 366-380.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:amwy4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.