IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/33722.html

Screening Through Soft Spending Limits: Evidence from the Medicare Therapy Cap

Author

Listed:
  • Ashvin Gandhi
  • Maggie Shi

Abstract

Governments and firms often use soft spending limits to curb overspending while allowing exceptions. We study a Medicare policy that capped per-patient physical therapy spending with exceptions for documented medical need. By screening out low-value care, the cap reduced spending by 8 percent without harming patient health. This screening was driven by Medicare’s exception decisions, whereas patients and providers scaled back care indiscriminately. However, the cap also generated horizontal inequities: conditional on need, lower-income and minority patients were more likely to be screened out because they were treated by smaller providers who were slower to adapt to new documentation requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashvin Gandhi & Maggie Shi, 2025. "Screening Through Soft Spending Limits: Evidence from the Medicare Therapy Cap," NBER Working Papers 33722, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:33722
    Note: AG EH
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w33722.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manasi Deshpande & Yue Li, 2019. "Who Is Screened Out? Application Costs and the Targeting of Disability Programs," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 213-248, November.
    2. Sendhil Mullainathan & Ziad Obermeyer, 2017. "Does Machine Learning Automate Moral Hazard and Error?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(5), pages 476-480, May.
    3. Amy Finkelstein & Matthew J Notowidigdo, 2019. "Take-Up and Targeting: Experimental Evidence from SNAP," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(3), pages 1505-1556.
    4. Susan E. Woodward & Robert E. Hall, 2012. "Diagnosing Consumer Confusion and Sub-optimal Shopping Effort: Theory and Mortgage-Market Evidence," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(7), pages 3249-3276, December.
    5. Maggie Shi, 2024. "Monitoring for Waste: Evidence from Medicare Audits," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 139(2), pages 993-1049.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Castell & Marc Gurgand & Clément Imbert & Todor Tochev, 2024. "Take-up of Social Benefits: Experimental Evidence from France," PSE Working Papers halshs-04720989, HAL.
    2. Tatiana Homonoff & Jason Somerville, 2021. "Program Recertification Costs: Evidence from SNAP," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 271-298, November.
    3. Horrigan, John B. & Whitacre, Brian E. & Galperin, Hernan, 2024. "Understanding uptake in demand-side broadband subsidy programs: The affordable connectivity program case," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8).
    4. Christopher J. O'Leary & Dallas Oberlee & Gabrielle Pepin, 2020. "Nudges to Increase Completion of Welfare Applications: Experimental Evidence from Michigan," Upjohn Working Papers 20-336, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    5. Plous Kresch, Evan & Lorán López, Carlota, 2025. "HKC03 - Leading a horse to water: Understanding the potential consequences of ordeals in subsidized tariff pricing," Oberlin College Kasper Economics and Business Working Papers Series 2503, Oberlin College, Department of Economics.
    6. Robert W. Hahn & Robert D. Metcalfe, 2021. "Efficiency and Equity Impacts of Energy Subsidies," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(5), pages 1658-1688, May.
    7. Keith Marzilli Ericson & Timothy J. Layton & Adrianna McIntyre & Adam Sacarny, 2023. "Reducing Administrative Barriers Increases Take-up of Subsidized Health Insurance Coverage: Evidence from a Field Experiment," NBER Working Papers 30885, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Jacob Arendt & Iben Bolvig, 2026. "Stepping stone or Exit Path: Experimental Evidence on Training the Long-Term Unemployed," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 26131, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).
    9. Abe Dunn & Joshua D Gottlieb & Adam Hale Shapiro & Daniel J Sonnenstuhl & Pietro Tebaldi, 2024. "A Denial a Day Keeps the Doctor Away," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 139(1), pages 187-233.
    10. Philip Armour & Melanie A. Zaber, 2020. "Does Student Loan Forgiveness Drive Disability Application?," NBER Working Papers 26787, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Elira Kuka & Bryan A. Stuart, 2021. "Racial Inequality in Unemployment Insurance Receipt and Take-Up," NBER Working Papers 29595, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Heather Klemick & Ann Wolverton & Bryan Parthum & Kristin Epstein & Sandra Kutzing & Sarah Armstrong, 2024. "Factors Influencing Customer Participation in a Program to Replace Lead Pipes for Drinking Water," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(3), pages 791-832, March.
    13. Hailey Heinz & Rebecca Fowler & Darlene Castillo & Andrew L. Breidenbach & Ruth Juarez & Bibek Acharya, 2025. "Family Perspectives on Childcare Subsidy Recertification in New Mexico: Barriers, Facilitators, and Implications for Family Stability," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 935-953, September.
    14. Koning, Pierre & Prudon, Roger, 2025. "Sick or Unemployed? Examining Transitions into Sickness Insurance at Unemployment Benefit Exhaustion," IZA Discussion Papers 18264, IZA Network @ LISER.
    15. Ha Trong Nguyen & Huong Thu Le & Luke B Connelly, 2021. "Who's declining the “free lunch”? New evidence from the uptake of public child dental benefits," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 270-288, February.
    16. Marianne Bitler & Jason Cook & Chloe N. East & Sonya R. Porter & Laura Tiehen, 2026. "The Intersection of Place and Need: How Lack of Enrollment Offices Deters Participation in the Safety Net," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(1), pages 239-271.
    17. Narayan, Ayushi, 2020. "Does simplifying the college financial aid process matter?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    18. Guan, Hongyu & Yang, Tianli & Zhang, Yunyun & Shi, Yaojiang, 2023. "Time's ticking! Effects of deadline on the utilization of health services: Evidence from a cluster-randomized controlled trial," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    19. Takanori Ida & Takunori Ishihara & Koichiro Ito & Daido Kido & Toru Kitagawa & Shosei Sakaguchi & Shusaku Sasaki, 2021. "Paternalism, Autonomy, or Both? Experimental Evidence from Energy Saving Programs," Papers 2112.09850, arXiv.org.
    20. Levere, Michael & Wittenburg, David & Jones, John T., 2025. "Can changes in disability insurance work incentives influence beneficiary employment? Evidence from the promoting opportunity demonstration," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H30 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - General
    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:33722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.