IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La rupture conventionnelle : objectifs officiels versus enjeux implicites




The ‘conventional cancelation’ is a way for employer and employee to mutually agree for ending the labor contract. Officially, it will permit to raise mutually beneficial agreements and to reduce the judge role. First, what is at stake here is the bargaining capacity of the employee and the nature of his agreement since he is in a relation of subordination. Second, the meaning of the eviction of the judge will be also questioned

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Berta & Camille Signoretto & Julie Valentin, 2010. "La rupture conventionnelle : objectifs officiels versus enjeux implicites," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10101, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
  • Handle: RePEc:mse:cesdoc:10101

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Évelyne Serverin & Julie Valentin & Thierry Kirat & Damien Sauze & Raphaël Dalmasso, 2008. "Évaluer le droit du licenciement. Comparaison des droits et des procédures, mesure des actions," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(4), pages 29-64.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Conventional cancelation; layoff; labor economy; labor contract; law and economics;

    JEL classification:

    • J83 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Workers' Rights
    • J88 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Public Policy
    • K31 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Labor Law

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mse:cesdoc:10101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lucie Label) or (Joanne Lustig). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.