IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The theory of public enterprise, social welfare and planning: a note

Listed author(s):
  • Elisa BORGHI


  • Chiara DEL BO


  • Massimo FLORIO


After reviewing the theory of social cost-benefit analysis, the paper uses it to illustrate necessary and sufficient conditions for public provision. (A)Under symmetric information and benevolent government, public provision is socially beneficial when there is a well defined public production plan for some goods, when policy and projects, i. e. changes in the production plan, are selected in such a way as to pass a social cost-benefit test at shadow prices, and production cannot be shut down for some goods. (B) Under not (fully) benevolent government, and asymmetric information, while shadow pricing rules do not change if the production plan is further distorted from the optimal one, sub-optimal policy adoption leads to inconsistency in project selection. The allocation of property rights will also be distorted, as privatization or nationalization are signals fixed by the government. Public provision and public procurement will be not equivalent, in general, while public provision can be seen as a form of public procurement. (C) If the social planner is not fully benevolent but cannot profit from policy design, still shadow prices are sufficient statistics for changes of the public plan. State-owned enterprises will be welfare superior to privately-owned enterprises if the rents of the planner are less than the rents of the POEs under procurement, and shadow prices must be used to compare the outcomes. The implication of the paper is that the rationale of public enterprises is destroyed by lack of planning and errors in corruption in policy adoption, but not by errors or corruption in production plans. This points to the overall quality of institutions as a pre-condition for socially desirable public enterprises

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano in its series Departmental Working Papers with number 2010-20.

in new window

Date of creation: 22 Jun 2010
Handle: RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2010-20
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Via Conservatorio 7, I-20122 Milan - Italy

Phone: +39 02 50321522
Fax: +39 02 50321505
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2010-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (DEMM Working Papers)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.