IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mib/wpaper/536.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Common factors behind companies' Environmental ratings

Author

Listed:
  • Gianluca Gucciardi
  • Elisa Ossola
  • Lucia Parisio
  • Matteo Pelagatti

Abstract

The increasing interest in sustainability within economics and finance has led to the widespread adoption of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics, expressed as ratings or indices, for assessing firms’ sustainable performance. However, inconsistencies among data providers stem not only from definitional differences but also from disagreements in measuring ESG factors. This paper proposes a novel approach by conversely focusing on ESG factors common to data providers. Through three empirical approaches—correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and panel data regressions—we aim to understand the structural components shaping ESG metrics, particularly in the Environmental Pillar. Our findings emphasize a limited number of indicators that act as common factors across three providers, primarily concerning the management of natural resources. Despite their shared thematic focus, depending on the provider, these indicators are approached with different perspectives—such as risk management, corporate impact management, and integration into corporate strategy. This analysis offers valuable insights for companies, financial institutions, practitioners, scholars, and policymakers, enabling more concise information for analyses and decision-making in their respective fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianluca Gucciardi & Elisa Ossola & Lucia Parisio & Matteo Pelagatti, 2024. "Common factors behind companies' Environmental ratings," Working Papers 536, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:mib:wpaper:536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.dems.unimib.it/repec/pdf/mibwpaper536.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Botsari, Antonia & Lang, Frank, 2020. "ESG considerations in venture capital and business angel investment decisions: Evidence from two pan-European surveys," EIF Working Paper Series 2020/63, European Investment Fund (EIF).
    2. Samuel M. Hartzmark & Abigail B. Sussman, 2019. "Do Investors Value Sustainability? A Natural Experiment Examining Ranking and Fund Flows," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 74(6), pages 2789-2837, December.
    3. Vincenzo Capizzi & Eleonora Gioia & Giancarlo Giudici & Francesca Tenca, 2021. "The Divergence Of Esg Ratings: An Analysis Of Italian Listed Companies," Journal of Financial Management, Markets and Institutions (JFMMI), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(02), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Florian Berg & Julian F. Koelbel & Anna Pavlova & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "ESG Confusion and Stock Returns: Tackling the Problem of Noise," NBER Working Papers 30562, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Singh, Amanjot, 2020. "COVID-19 and safer investment bets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    6. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    7. Jin Wook Kim & Cheong Kyu Park, 2023. "Can ESG Performance Mitigate Information Asymmetry? Moderating Effect of Assurance Services," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(26), pages 2993-3007, June.
    8. Jinhua Cui & Hoje Jo & Haejung Na, 2018. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Information Asymmetry?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 549-572, March.
    9. I. T. Jolliffe, 1973. "Discarding Variables in a Principal Component Analysis. Ii: Real Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 22(1), pages 21-31, March.
    10. Lioui, Abraham & Tarelli, Andrea, 2022. "Chasing the ESG factor," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    11. Aaron K. Chatterji & Rodolphe Durand & David I. Levine & Samuel Touboul, 2016. "Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1597-1614, August.
    12. Elizabeth Demers & Jurian Hendrikse & Philip Joos & Baruch Lev, 2021. "ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3-4), pages 433-462, March.
    13. Gerhard Halbritter & Gregor Dorfleitner, 2015. "The wages of social responsibility — where are they? A critical review of ESG investing," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 25-35, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Staněk Gyönyör, Lucie & Horváth, Matúš, 2024. "Does ESG affect stock market dependence? An empirical exploration of S&P 1200 companies shows the divergent nature of E–S–G pillars," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Caterina Lucarelli & Sabrina Severini, 2024. "Anatomy of the chimera: Environmental, Social, and Governance ratings beyond the myth," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4198-4217, July.
    3. Jian Zhou & Xiaodong Lei & Jianglong Yu, 2024. "ESG rating divergence and corporate green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2911-2930, May.
    4. Zou, Jin & Yan, Jingzhou & Deng, Guoying, 2023. "ESG rating confusion and bond spreads," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    5. Luo, Deqing & Shan, Xun & Yan, Jingzhou & Yan, Qianhui, 2023. "Sustainable investment under ESG volatility and ambiguity," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    6. Darendeli, Alper & Fiechter, Peter & Hitz, Jörg-Markus & Lehmann, Nico, 2022. "The role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) information in supply-chain contracting: Evidence from the expansion of CSR rating coverage," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(2).
    7. Wong, Jin Boon & Zhang, Qin, 2024. "ESG reputation risks, cash holdings, and payout policies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Lestari, Jenjang Sri & Frömmel, Michael, 2024. "Socially responsible investments: doing good while doing well in developed versus emerging markets?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Michele Rubino & Ilaria Mastrorocco & Giovanni Maria Garegnani, 2024. "The influence of market and institutional factors on ESG rating disagreement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3916-3926, September.
    10. Jun Xie & Yoshitaka Tanaka & Alexander Ryota Keeley & Hidemichi Fujii & Shunsuke Managi, 2023. "Do investors incorporate financial materiality? Remapping the environmental information in corporate sustainability reporting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2924-2952, November.
    11. Lei, Heng & Xue, Minggao & Liu, Huiling & Ye, Jing, 2023. "Precious metal as a safe haven for global ESG stocks: Portfolio implications for socially responsible investing," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Wang, Xue & Liu, Qingyuan, 2024. "Information disclosure and ESG rating disagreement: Evidence from green bond issuance in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    13. Yang, Junhua & Agyei, Samuel Kwaku & Bossman, Ahmed & Gubareva, Mariya & Marfo-Yiadom, Edward, 2024. "Energy, metals, market uncertainties, and ESG stocks: Analysing predictability and safe havens," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).
    14. Luo, Di & Farag, Hisham, 2024. "ESG and aggregate disagreement," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    15. Wang, Linyu & Ji, Yifan & Ni, Zhongxin, 2023. "Spillover of stock price crash risk: Do environmental, social and governance (ESG) matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Kleffel, Philipp & Muck, Matthias, 2023. "Aggregate confusion or inner conflict? An experimental analysis of investors’ reaction to greenwashing," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    17. Ann Susan Thomas & Ambili Jayachandran & Ajithakumari Vijayappan Nair Biju, 2024. "Strategic mapping of the environmental social governance landscape in finance – A bibliometric exploration through concepts and themes," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4428-4453, September.
    18. Jin, Yurong & Yan, Jingzhou & Yan, Qianhui, 2024. "Unraveling ESG Ambiguity, Price Reaction, and Trading Volume," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    19. Wenya Sun & Yichen Luo & Siu-Ming Yiu & Luping Yu & Wenzhi Ding, 2024. "ESG scores, scandal probability, and event returns," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Long, Huaigang & Chiah, Mardy & Cakici, Nusret & Zaremba, Adam & Bilgin, Mehmet Huseyin, 2024. "ESG investing in good and bad times: An international study," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ESG; ESG ratings; Common Factors; Rating Disagreement;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mib:wpaper:536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Matteo Pelagatti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dpmibit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.