IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lis/liswps/926.html

Inequality Among Women: Is There Variety?

Author

Listed:
  • Petra Sauer

  • Rosa Mulè

Abstract

The expansion of women’s education and employment has transformed labor markets across advanced democracies. Yet comparatively little is known about how educational wage inequality among women has evolved across countries and over time. This article examines wage gaps between college- and non-college-educated women in the United States, Germany, and Sweden between 1991 and 2020. We propose a framework of women’s inequality regimes that captures the interplay between labor market and family policies in shaping women’s economic opportunities and constraints. Drawing on data from the Luxembourg Income Study and using unconditional quantile regression, we analyze both the magnitude of educational wage inequality and the extent to which it is driven by women at the top or bottom of the wage distribution. We find that educational wage inequality is largest in the United States and smallest in Sweden, while Germany occupies an intermediate position but exhibits the most pronounced increase over time. This increase is driven by both rising wages among highly educated women at the top of the wage distribution and the growing concentration of low-educated women at the bottom. Our findings indicate that the institutions facilitating women’s labor market integration also shape women’s inequality regimes, with important implications for social stratification and household inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Petra Sauer & Rosa Mulè, 2026. "Inequality Among Women: Is There Variety?," LIS Working papers 926, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
  • Handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/liswps/926.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Piotr Paradowski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lisprlu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.