IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lat/gstion/2005-03.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La diversité des émotions ressenties dans un point de vente

Author

Listed:
  • LICHTLE, Marie-Christine

    (LEG-CERMAB - CNRS - IAE - Université de Bourgogne)

  • PLICHON, Véronique

    (IUT de Tours - CERMAT)

Abstract

De nombreuses recherches ont montré que les simuli sensoriels de l'atmosphère du point de vente pouvaient affecter le comportement du consommateur. Certaines pratiques des distributeurs cherchent, en effet, à valoriser l'expérience vécue par le chaland, en lui faisant éprouver certaines sensations. Toutefois, la diversité des réactions affectives pouvant être suscitées dans un environnement commercial n'a pas encore été mise en évidence. C'est l'objet de la présente étude. Les résultats montrent, d'une part, que les états affectifs peuvent être décrits par 6 dimensions et sont d'intensité variable. D'autre part, certaines enseignes de la distribution peuvent être caractérisées par le type et l'intensité des émotions ressenties. Sensory stimuli of a retail environment are supposed to influence consumer behavior. In fact, the aim of retailers may be to improve the shopping experience, by creating specific feelings. But the diversity of affects generated in a point of sale environment has not been underlined. On the one hand, results show that affects can be represented by 6 dimensions and that their intensity is variable. On the other hand, retail organizations may be described by the type and the intensity of the emotions felt by customers.

Suggested Citation

  • LICHTLE, Marie-Christine & PLICHON, Véronique, 2005. "La diversité des émotions ressenties dans un point de vente," LEG - CERMAB / Centre de Recherche en Marketing de Bourgogne - Cahier de recherche 2005-03, LEG - CERMAB, CNRS UMR 5118, Université de Bourgogne.
  • Handle: RePEc:lat:gstion:2005-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Russell, James A & Mehrabian, Albert, 1976. "Environmental Variables in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 3(1), pages 62-63, June.
    2. Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne, 1985. "Measuring the Involvement Construct," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(3), pages 341-352, December.
    3. Richins, Marsha L, 1997. "Measuring Emotions in the Consumption Experience," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(2), pages 127-146, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lionel Nicod & Sylvie Llosa, 2018. "How should customers be trained in their role as coproducers? The influence of training and its characteristics on the benefits of coproduction," Post-Print hal-03513344, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanhamme, J., 2003. "Surprise... Surprise..., An Empirical Investigation on How Surprise is Connected to Customer Satisfaction," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-005-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    2. Honea, Heather & Dahl, Darren W., 2005. "The Promotion Affect Scale: Defining the Affective Dimensions of Promotion," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 543-551, April.
    3. Andrée Marie López-Fernández, 2020. "Price sensitivity versus ethical consumption: a study of Millennial utilitarian consumer behavior," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(2), pages 57-68, June.
    4. Hansen, Flemming, 2005. "Distinguishing between feelings and emotions in understanding communication effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(10), pages 1426-1436, October.
    5. Andrée Marie López-Fernández, 0. "Price sensitivity versus ethical consumption: a study of Millennial utilitarian consumer behavior," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-12.
    6. Ligas, Mark & Chaudhuri, Arjun, 2012. "The moderating roles of shopper experience and store type on the relationship between perceived merchandise value and willingness to pay a higher price," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 249-258.
    7. Zha, Dongmei & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea, 2023. "Synthesizing the customer experience concept: A multimodularity approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    8. Wakefield, Lane T. & Wakefield, Robin L., 2018. "Anxiety and Ephemeral Social Media Use in Negative eWOM Creation," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 44-59.
    9. repec:jtr:journl:v:9:y:2014:i:1:p:28-64 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Anita Pansari & V. Kumar, 2017. "Customer engagement: the construct, antecedents, and consequences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 294-311, May.
    11. Zeinab Rezvani & Johan Jansson & Maria Bengtsson, 2018. "Consumer motivations for sustainable consumption: The interaction of gain, normative and hedonic motivations on electric vehicle adoption," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1272-1283, December.
    12. Inwon Kang & Deokhee Cheon & Matthew Shin, 2011. "Advertising strategy for outbound travel services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 5(4), pages 361-380, December.
    13. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    14. Malin Jonell & Beatrice Crona & Kelsey Brown & Patrik Rönnbäck & Max Troell, 2016. "Eco-Labeled Seafood: Determinants for (Blue) Green Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Merja Halme & Kari Linden & Kimmo Kääriä, 2009. "Patients’ Preferences for Generic and Branded Over-the-Counter Medicines," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 2(4), pages 243-255, December.
    16. Mahan, Joseph E. & Seo, Won Jae & Jordan, Jeremy S. & Funk, Daniel, 2015. "Exploring the impact of social networking sites on running involvement, running behavior, and social life satisfaction," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 182-192.
    17. Garaus, Marion & Wagner, Udo, 2016. "Retail shopper confusion: Conceptualization, scale development, and consequences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3459-3467.
    18. O'Cass, A., 2000. "An assessment of consumers product, purchase decision, advertising and consumption involvement in fashion clothing," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 545-576, October.
    19. Eunae Jung & Hyungun Sung, 2017. "The Influence of the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Outbreak on Online and Offline Markets for Retail Sales," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, March.
    20. Kautish, Pradeep & Paço, Arminda & Thaichon, Park, 2022. "Sustainable consumption and plastic packaging: Relationships among product involvement, perceived marketplace influence and choice behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    21. Nitin Walia & Mark Srite & Wendy Huddleston, 2016. "Eyeing the web interface: the influence of price, product, and personal involvement," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 297-333, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lat:gstion:2005-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/latecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.