IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kyo/wpaper/787.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Goodness Of Fit Test For Ergodic Markov Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Vance Martin

    (Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne)

  • Yoshihiko Nishiyama

    (Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University)

  • John Stachurski

    (Research School of Economics, Australian National University)

Abstract

We introduce a goodness of fit test for ergodic Markov processes. Our test compares the data against the set of stationary densities implied by the class of models specified in the null hypothesis, and rejects if no model in the class yields a stationary density that matches with the data. No alternative needs to be specified in order to implement the test. Although our test compares densities it involves no smoothing parameters, and is powerful against 1√n local alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Vance Martin & Yoshihiko Nishiyama & John Stachurski, 2011. "A Goodness Of Fit Test For Ergodic Markov Processes," KIER Working Papers 787, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:kyo:wpaper:787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kier.kyoto-u.ac.jp/DP/DP787.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Stachurski & Vance Martin, 2008. "Computing the Distributions of Economic Models via Simulation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 443-450, March.
    2. Chen, Song Xi & Gao, Jiti & Tang, Chenghong, 2005. "A test for model specification of diffusion processes," MPRA Paper 11976, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Feb 2007.
    3. Nishimura, Kazuo & Stachurski, John, 2005. "Stability of stochastic optimal growth models: a new approach," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 100-118, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. R. Anton Braun & Huiyu Li & John Stachurski, 2012. "Generalized Look-Ahead Methods for Computing Stationary Densities," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 489-500, August.
    2. John Stachurski, 2009. "Economic Dynamics: Theory and Computation," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262012774, September.
    3. Azariadis, Costas & Stachurski, John, 2005. "Poverty Traps," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 5, Elsevier.
    4. Takashi Kamihigashi & John Stachurski, 2011. "Existence, Stability and Computation of Stationary Distributions: An Extension of the Hopenhayn-Prescott Theorem," Discussion Paper Series DP2011-32, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    5. Zhang, Yuzhe, 2007. "Stochastic optimal growth with a non-compact state space," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 115-129, February.
    6. Zhu, Mei & Wang, Duo & Guo, Maozheng, 2011. "Stochastic equilibria of an asset pricing model with heterogeneous beliefs and random dividends," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 131-147, January.
    7. Mirman, Leonard J. & Morand, Olivier F. & Reffett, Kevin L., 2008. "A qualitative approach to Markovian equilibrium in infinite horizon economies with capital," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 75-98, March.
    8. Antunes, António & Cavalcanti, Tiago & Villamil, Anne, 2008. "Computing general equilibrium models with occupational choice and financial frictions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(7-8), pages 553-568, July.
    9. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-086 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Mitra, Tapan & Roy, Santanu, 2017. "Optimality of Ramsey–Euler policy in the stochastic growth model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1-25.
    11. Kamihigashi, Takashi & Stachurski, John, 2014. "Stochastic stability in monotone economies," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 9(2), May.
    12. Nishimura, Kazuo & Rudnicki, Ryszard & Stachurski, John, 2006. "Stochastic optimal growth with nonconvexities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 74-96, February.
    13. Stephane Verani, 2018. "Aggregate Consequences of Dynamic Credit Relationships," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 29, pages 44-67, July.
    14. Tao Zou & Song Xi Chen, 2017. "Enhancing Estimation for Interest Rate Diffusion Models With Bond Prices," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 486-498, July.
    15. Cai, Yiyong & Kamihigashi, Takashi & Stachurski, John, 2014. "Stochastic optimal growth with risky labor supply," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 167-176.
    16. Song Xi Chen & Jiti Gao, 2010. "Simultaneous Testing of Mean and Variance Structures in Nonlinear Time Series Models," School of Economics Working Papers 2010-28, University of Adelaide, School of Economics.
    17. Nicole Bauerle & Anna Ja'skiewicz, 2015. "Stochastic Optimal Growth Model with Risk Sensitive Preferences," Papers 1509.05638, arXiv.org.
    18. Kazuo Nishimura & John Stachurski, 2004. "Stochastic Optimal Growth when the Discount Rate Vanishes," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 908, The University of Melbourne.
    19. Gong, Liutang & Zhao, Xiaojun & Yang, Yunhong & Hengfu, Zou, 2010. "Stochastic growth with social-status concern: The existence of a unique stable distribution," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 505-518, July.
    20. Chatterjee, Partha & Shukayev, Malik, 2008. "Note on positive lower bound of capital in the stochastic growth model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 2137-2147, July.
    21. Juan Pablo Rincón-Zapatero, 2020. "Differentiability of the value function and Euler equation in non-concave discrete-time stochastic dynamic programming," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 8(1), pages 79-88, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Specification test; goodness of fit; Markov processes.;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kyo:wpaper:787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ryo Okui) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ryo Okui to update the entry or send us the correct email address. General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iekyojp.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.