IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iuj/wpaper/ems_2000_03.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Extended Growth-Factor Decomposition Analysis Based on Three-Region Interregional I-O Tables: the Case of Kyushu Region

Author

Abstract

This paper applies the extended growth-factor decomposition method, which was developed by Akita (1999), to a three-region interregional I-O system consisting of the Kyushu region, the Kanto region, and all other regions in Japan to analyze the effects of regional characteristics and government policies on the growth patterns of the Kyushu region from 1965 to 1990. The Kyushu region, accounting for about 10 percent of the national economy, is regarded as an interesting case in regional economic development in Japan since its economy experienced a drastic structural change corresponding to changes in economic environment and government policies. The use of the three-region I-O system including the Kanto region also allows for an examination of the role of the Kanto region, which generates more than 40 percent of total gross domestic product and has exerted significant effects upon the rest of the nation, in the growth of Japan's regional economies. The extended growth-factor decomposition analysis based on the three-region interregional I-O system thus provides a better picture of the roles of interregional industrial linkages in the growth of Japan's regional economies. This paper analyzes changes in the pattern of regional economic growth over the period 1965-1990.

Suggested Citation

  • Takahiro Akita, 2000. "An Extended Growth-Factor Decomposition Analysis Based on Three-Region Interregional I-O Tables: the Case of Kyushu Region," Working Papers EMS_2000_03, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
    • Handle: RePEc:iuj:wpaper:ems_2000_03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iuj.ac.jp/workingpapers/index.cfm?File=EMS_2000_03.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2000
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonis, Michael & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D., 1993. "Hierarchies of Regional Sub-Structures and Their Multipliers within Input-output Systems Miyazawa Revisited," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 34(1), pages 33-44, June.
    2. Skolka, Jiri, 1989. "Input-output structural decomposition analysis for Austria," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 45-66.
    3. Chinkook Lee & Gerald Schluter, 1993. "Growth and Structural Change in U.S. Food and Fiber Industries: An Input-Output Perspective," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(3), pages 666-673.
    4. Holland, D & Cooke, S C, 1992. "Sources of Structural Change in the Washington Economy: An Input-Output Perspective," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 26(2), pages 155-170, June.
    5. Round, Jeffrey I, 1985. "Decomposing Multipliers for Economic Systems Involving Regional and World Trade," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 95(378), pages 383-399, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hong, Jae Pyo & Byun, Jeong Eun & Kim, Pang Ryong, 2016. "Structural changes and growth factors of the ICT industry in Korea: 1995–2009," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 502-513.
    2. Piaggio, Matías & Alcántara, Vicent & Padilla, Emilio, 2015. "The materiality of the immaterial," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Schluter, Gerald E. & Lee, Chinkook, 1996. "Changing Food Consumption Patterns, Their Effect On The U.S. Food System, 1972-1987: An Input-Output Perspective," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 27(2), pages 1-8, July.
    4. Matías Piaggio & Vicent Alcántara Escolano & Emilio Padilla Rosa, 2013. "The materiality of the immaterial. Services sectors and CO2 emissions in Uruguay," Working Papers wpdea1306, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    5. Guilhoto, Joaquim J.M. & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D. & Sonis, Michael & Jiemin, Guo, 2001. "Research Note: Economic Structural Change Over Time: Brazil and the United States Compared," MPRA Paper 42539, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Skuras, Dimitris & Psaltopoulos, Demetrios, 2016. "Estimating Spatial Employment Impacts of the CAP through Social Accounting Analysis," 160th Seminar, December 1-2, 2016, Warsaw, Poland 249760, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Irfan Ahmed & Claudio Socci & Francesca Severini & Qaiser Rafique Yasser & Rosita Pretaroli, 2018. "The structures of production, final demand and agricultural output: a Macro Multipliers analysis of the Nigerian economy," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 35(3), pages 691-739, December.
    8. Michael Sonis & J. D. Hewings & Jiemin Guo, 2000. "A New Image of Classical Key Sector Analysis: Minimum Information Decomposition of the Leontief Inverse," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 401-423.
    9. Linden, J.A. van der & Oosterhaven, J., 1996. "EC intercountry input-output relations : an income growth decomposition for 1970-1980," Research Report 96C23, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    10. Paul B. Siegel & Jeffrey Alwang & Thomas G. Johnson, 1995. "Decomposing Sources of Regional Growth with an Input-output Model: A Framework for Policy Analysis," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 18(3), pages 331-353, July.
    11. Shigemi Kagawa & Hajime Inamura, 2001. "A Structural Decomposition of Energy Consumption Based on a Hybrid Rectangular Input-Output Framework: Japan's Case," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 339-363.
    12. repec:dgr:rugsom:96c23 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Lechón, Y. & de la Rúa, C. & Rodríguez, I. & Caldés, N., 2019. "Socioeconomic implications of biofuels deployment through an Input-Output approach. A case study in Uruguay," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 178-191.
    14. Nguyen Quang Thai & Bui Trinh & Nguyen Hong Nhung, 2019. "The Discussion on Input – Output Framework Extended for Analyzing on Relationship between Demographic and Economic," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(6), pages 52-57, June.
    15. Alexandre Messa, 2012. "Structural Change in The Brazilian Economy in The 2000s," Discussion Papers 1770, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
    16. Xiuli Liu & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings, 2019. "Identification of changes in the economic interactions among sectors from 1995 to 2010 for Chicago economy using hierarchical feedback loop analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 62(3), pages 637-655, June.
    17. Seung, Chang K., 2017. "A Multi-regional Economic Impact Analysis of Alaska Salmon Fishery Failures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 22-30.
    18. Yasuhide Okuyama & Michael Sonis & Geoffrey Hewings, 2006. "Typology of structural change in a regional economy: a temporal inverse analysis," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 133-153.
    19. Arne J. Nagengast & Robert Stehrer, 2016. "The Great Collapse in Value Added Trade," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 392-421, May.
    20. Vogel, Stephen & Miller, Cristina & Ralston, Katherine, 2021. "Impact of USDA's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) on Rural and Urban Economies in the Aftermath of the Great Recession," Economic Research Report 327185, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    21. Huanjia Ma & Raquel Ortega-Argiles & Matthew Lyons, 2024. "UK Levelling Up R&D mission effects: A multi-region input-output approach," MIOIR Working Paper Series 2024-03, The Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR), The University of Manchester.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iuj:wpaper:ems_2000_03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kazumi Imai, Office of Academic Affairs (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsiujjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.