IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/200801010800001479.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Feed Grains and Livestock: Impacts on Meat Supplies and Prices

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence, John
  • Mintert, James
  • Anderson, John D.
  • Anderson, David P.

Abstract

Agriculture in the United States is undergoing a significant change. Grain, oilseed, and land prices have increased significantly, creating a subsequent increase in the income and wealth of many rural Americans—unless you are in animal agriculture. Feed is the largest single cost item for livestock and poultry production, accounting for 60%– 70% of the total cost in most years. Although energy, labor, and other inputs have increased, feed costs have increased anywhere from 40%–60% (depending on the species) in the last two years. As price takers in competitive markets, animal producers cannot simply pass their higher costs on to consumers. To date, rising costs have largely been absorbed by livestock and poultry producers, often with significant financial loss. However, higher costs of production will ultimately have to be reflected in higher prices for meat, milk, and eggs at retail counters in the United States and elsewhere. This adjustment process is complex, lengthy, painful, and not without unintended consequences. In this article we attempt to explain what is happening to feed costs, including the likely consequences of the recent ethanol boom on these costs and how the different sectors—beef, dairy, pork, and poultry—are adjusting to higher costs. Importantly, speed of adjustment will vary significantly as industries with shorter production cycles, such as poultry, are able to respond in a matter of months whereas adjustments in industries with longer production cycles, such as beef, can take a period of several years.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence, John & Mintert, James & Anderson, John D. & Anderson, David P., 2008. "Feed Grains and Livestock: Impacts on Meat Supplies and Prices," ISU General Staff Papers 200801010800001479, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:200801010800001479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/6648ce5c-2b8e-47b3-85a7-a535ec0bb9ae/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Andersone & Sarmite Janceva & Liga Lauberte & Natalija Zaharova & Mihail Chervenkov & Vilhelmine Jurkjane & Lilija Jashina & Gints Rieksts & Galina Telysheva, 2023. "Granulated Animal Feed and Fuel Based on Sea Buckthorn Agro-Waste Biomass for Sustainable Berry Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Jin Guo & Tetsuji Tanaka, 2020. "The Effectiveness of Self-Sufficiency Policy: International Price Transmissions in Beef Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Octavio Carrillo-Muro & Alejandro Rivera-Villegas & Pedro Hernandez-Briano & Marco Antonio Lopez-Carlos & Beatriz Isabel Castro-Perez, 2023. "Effect of Dietary Calcium Propionate Inclusion Period on the Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, and Meat Quality of Feedlot Ram Lambs," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Luong, Phat V. & Xu, Xiaowei, 2020. "Pass-through of commodity price shocks in distribution channels with risk-averse agents," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Markus Arlindo Monteiro & Brent Damian Jammer, 2024. "Price Dynamics in South African Agriculture: A Study of Cross-Commodity Spillovers between Grain and Livestock Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Hitaj, Claudia & Suttles, Shellye, 2016. "Trends in U.S. Agriculture's Consumption and Production of Energy: Renewable Power, Shale Energy, and Cellulosic Biomass," Economic Information Bulletin 262140, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Tejeda, Hernan A. & Goodwin, Barry K., 2009. "Price Volatility, Nonlinearity, and Asymmetric Adjustments in Corn, Soybean, and Cattle Markets: Implications of Ethanol-Driven (Market) Shocks," 2009 Conference, April 20-21, 2009, St. Louis, Missouri 53039, NCCC-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
    8. Buddhika Patalee & Glynn T. Tonsor, 2021. "Weather effects on U.S. cow‐calf production: A long‐term panel analysis," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(4), pages 838-857, October.
    9. Obed Quaicoe & Fafanyo Asiseh & Atta Selorm Aloka, 2024. "Enhancing Year-Round Profitability for Small-Scale Ranchers: An Economic Analysis of Integrated Cattle and Mushroom Production System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Ji Yong Lee & Allen Featherstone & Rodolfo M. Nayga & Doo Bong Han, 2019. "The Long-Run and Short-Run Effects of Ethanol Production on U.S. Beef Producers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Faruk Urak & Abdulbaki Bilgic & Gürkan Bozma & Wojciech J. Florkowski & Erkan Efekan, 2022. "Volatility in Live Calf, Live Sheep, and Feed Wheat Return Markets: A Threat to Food Price Stability in Turkey," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-24, April.
    12. P. Martyshev, 2018. "Development of Ukrainian livestock sector and its support in conditions of growing global grain prices," Economy and Forecasting, Valeriy Heyets, issue 4, pages 93-105.
    13. Hao, Na & Colson, Gregory & Seong, Byeongchan & Park, Cheolwoo & Wetzstein, Michael, 2015. "Drought, ethanol, and livestock," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 301-307.
    14. Malcolm, Scott A. & Aillery, Marcel P. & Weinberg, Marca, 2009. "Ethanol and a Changing Agricultural Landscape," Economic Research Report 55671, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. Lydia K. Olagunju & Omoanghe S. Isikhuemhen & Peter A. Dele & Felicia N. Anike & Brandon G. Essick & Nathan Holt & Nkese S. Udombang & Kelechi A. Ike & Yasmine Shaw & Rosetta M. Brice & Oluteru E. Ori, 2023. "Pleurotus ostreatus Can Significantly Improve the Nutritive Value of Lignocellulosic Crop Residues," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • A10 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:200801010800001479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.