IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc143418.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Workplace Adoption of In-House GenAI Tools: The Case of GPT@JRC at the European Commission

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence is driving digital transformation, with Generative AI (GenAI) emerging as a transformative innovation. In mid-2023, the European Commission launched GPT@JRC, an in-house tool, enabling safe, privacy-compliant experimentation with GenAI across EU bodies. GPT@JRC is mainly used for text enhancement and learning, with users reporting gains in productivity and output quality. Time savings are strongly linked to the effectiveness of prompts, and regular use enhances both efficiency and quality. Older users may perceive fewer benefits compared to their younger counterparts. The main challenges for GPT@JRC include addressing content inconsistencies and improving its features. Employees also stress the need for training, which aligns with the European Commission’s ongoing efforts to develop AI skills among EU workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernandez Machado Roxana & Amaral-garcia Sofia & Duch Brown Nestor, 2025. "Workplace Adoption of In-House GenAI Tools: The Case of GPT@JRC at the European Commission," JRC Research Reports JRC143418, Joint Research Centre.
    • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc143418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC143418
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Brynjolfsson & Danielle Li & Lindsey Raymond, 2025. "Generative AI at Work," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(2), pages 889-942.
    2. Charles Hoffreumon & Chris Forman & Nicolas van Zeebroeck, 2024. "Make or buy your artificial intelligence? Complementarities in technology sourcing," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 452-479, March.
    3. Anton Korinek, 2023. "Generative AI for Economic Research: Use Cases and Implications for Economists," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 61(4), pages 1281-1317, December.
    4. David Kreitmeir & Paul A. Raschky, 2024. "The Heterogeneous Productivity Effects of Generative AI," Papers 2403.01964, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    5. Voraprapa Nakavachara & Tanapong Potipiti & Thanee Chaiwat, 2024. "Experimenting with Generative AI: Does ChatGPT Really Increase Everyone's Productivity?," Papers 2403.01770, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Venturini, 2025. "Generative AI and Income Growth: Early Evidence on Global Data," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 31-46.
    2. Samuel Chang & Andrew Kennedy & Aaron Leonard & John A. List, 2024. "12 Best Practices for Leveraging Generative AI in Experimental Research," NBER Working Papers 33025, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Buchanan, Joy & Hickman, William, 2024. "Do people trust humans more than ChatGPT?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Qiang Chen & Tianyang Han & Jin Li & Ye Luo & Yuxiao Wu & Xiaowei Zhang & Tuo Zhou, 2025. "Can AI Master Econometrics? Evidence from Econometrics AI Agent on Expert-Level Tasks," Papers 2506.00856, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    5. Lukas B. Freund & Lukas F. Mann, 2025. "Job Transformation, Specialization, and the Labor Market Effects of AI," CESifo Working Paper Series 12072, CESifo.
    6. Rosa-García, Alfonso, 2024. "Student Reactions to AI-Replicant Professor in an Econ101 Teaching Video," MPRA Paper 120135, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Abendroth Dias Kulani & Arias Patricia & Bacco F. Manlio & Bassani Elias & Bertoletti Alice & Bertolini Lorenzo & Bertrand Astrid & Bili Danai & Boucher Philip & Cachia Romina & Ceresa Mario & Chaslot, 2025. "Generative AI Outlook Report," JRC Research Reports JRC142598, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Zara Contractor & Germ'an Reyes, 2025. "Generative AI in Higher Education: Evidence from an Elite College," Papers 2508.00717, arXiv.org.
    9. Christoph Riedl & Eric Bogert, 2024. "Effects of AI Feedback on Learning, the Skill Gap, and Intellectual Diversity," Papers 2409.18660, arXiv.org.
    10. Carvajal, Daniel & Franco, Catalina & Isaksson, Siri, 2024. "Will Artificial Intelligence Get in the Way of Achieving Gender Equality?," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 3/2024, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics, revised 28 Apr 2025.
    11. Riccardo Zanardelli, 2025. "The human-machine paradox: how collaboration creates or destroys value, and why augmentation is key to resolving it," Papers 2509.14057, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    12. Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Adam B. Jaffe & Joel Waldfogel, 2025. "Intellectual Property and Creative Machines," Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(1), pages 47-79.
    13. Tatsuru Kikuchi, 2025. "Weather-Aware AI Systems versus Route-Optimization AI: A Comprehensive Analysis of AI Applications in Transportation Productivity," Papers 2507.17099, arXiv.org.
    14. Leonardo Banh & Gero Strobel, 2023. "Generative artificial intelligence," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Carlo Drago & Alberto Costantiello & Marco Savorgnan & Angelo Leogrande, 2025. "Macroeconomic and Labor Market Drivers of AI Adoption in Europe: A Machine Learning and Panel Data Approach," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-62, August.
    16. Alexander Cuntz & Carsten Fink & Hansueli Stamm, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property : An Economic Perspective," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 77, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    17. Dragan Filimonovic & Christian Rutzer & Conny Wunsch, 2025. "Can GenAI Improve Academic Performance? Evidence from the Social and Behavioral Sciences," Papers 2510.02408, arXiv.org.
    18. Lilia Patrignani, 2024. "Understanding digital trade," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 841, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    19. Kiran Tomlinson & Sonia Jaffe & Will Wang & Scott Counts & Siddharth Suri, 2025. "Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupations," Papers 2507.07935, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    20. Frank M. Fossen & Trevor McLemore & Alina Sorgner, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and Entrepreneurship," Foundations and Trends(R) in Entrepreneurship, now publishers, vol. 20(8), pages 781-904, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc143418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.