IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2510.02408.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Can GenAI Improve Academic Performance? Evidence from the Social and Behavioral Sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Dragan Filimonovic
  • Christian Rutzer
  • Conny Wunsch

Abstract

This paper estimates the effect of Generative AI (GenAI) adoption on scientific productivity and quality in the social and behavioral sciences. Using matched author-level panel data and a difference-in-differences design, we find that GenAI adoption is associated with sizable increases in research productivity, measured by the number of published papers. It also leads to moderate gains in publication quality, based on journal impact factors. These effects are most pronounced among early-career researchers, authors working in technically complex subfields, and those from non-English-speaking countries. The results suggest that GenAI tools may help lower some structural barriers in academic publishing and promote more inclusive participation in research.

Suggested Citation

  • Dragan Filimonovic & Christian Rutzer & Conny Wunsch, 2025. "Can GenAI Improve Academic Performance? Evidence from the Social and Behavioral Sciences," Papers 2510.02408, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.02408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.02408
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.02408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.