IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc143181.html

Bridging the Living Income Gap for Cocoa Producers in Cameroon [Réduire l'écart de revenu vital des producteurs de cacao au Cameroun]

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This report examines the Living Income Gap for cocoa-producing households in Cameroon, where 68% of farmers earn an income below the Living Income Benchmark (LIB) of 277,136 FCFA per month for a family of 5.2 persons and therefore cannot afford a decent standard of living. Key factors contributing to this gap include low productivity and low farm gate prices. The report identifies a minimum reference price of 3,567 FCFA per kilogram as necessary to close this gap. The study assesses several short and longer-term strategies to address these challenges, including increasing farm gate prices, enhancing productivity through better farming practices and input use, and developing off-farm income opportunities to diversify income sources. Ensuring a remunerative farm gate price can substantially increase cocoa producers’ incomes, particularly for those specialized in cocoa production. Market access and diversification strategies are particularly supportive of cocoa producers where cocoa represents a small share of their productive land. Through these efforts, the report aims to provide actionable insights for policymakers and stakeholders to improve the livelihoods of cocoa farmers and ensure the long-term sustainability and economic viability of the cocoa sector in Cameroon. [Le présent rapport examine l’écart de revenu vital pour les ménages producteurs de cacao au Cameroun, où 68 % des agriculteurs perçoivent un revenu inférieur au revenu vital de référence (LIB – Living Income Benchmark en anglais) de 277 136 FCFA par mois pour une famille de 5,2 personnes et ne peuvent donc pas bénéficier d’un niveau de vie décent. Parmi les principaux facteurs contribuant à cet écart figurent le faible niveau des prix au producteur et la faible productivité. La présente étude définit un prix de référence minimal de 3 567 FCFA par kilogramme comme étant nécessaire pour combler cet écart. L’étude évalue également plusieurs stratégies à court et à long terme pour relever ces défis, notamment l’augmentation des prix au producteur, l’amélioration de la productivité grâce à de meilleures pratiques agricoles et à l’utilisation des intrants, et le développement de possibilités de revenus hors exploitation afin de diversifier les sources de revenus. Garantir un prix aux producteurs bord-champs rémunérateur pourrait augmenter considérablement les revenus des producteurs de cacao, en particulier ceux qui sont les plus spécialisés dans la production de fève de cacao. Les stratégies d’accès au marché et de diversification sont également particulièrement favorables aux producteurs de cacao, dans les cas où cette production représente une faible part de leur exploitation agricole. Sur la base des résultats de l’étude, le rapport vise à fournir des informations exploitables aux décideurs politiques et aux parties prenantes afin d’améliorer les moyens de subsistance des producteurs de cacao et de garantir la durabilité et la viabilité économique à long terme du secteur du cacao au Cameroun.]

Suggested Citation

  • Krumbiegel Katharina & Covarrubias Katia Alejandra & De La O Campos Ana Paula & Akamin Ajap & Tillie Pascal, 2026. "Bridging the Living Income Gap for Cocoa Producers in Cameroon [Réduire l'écart de revenu vital des producteurs de cacao au Cameroun]," JRC Research Reports JRC143181, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc143181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC143181
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Anker & Martha Anker, 2017. "Living Wages Around the World," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 17350.
    2. Sheahan, Megan & Barrett, Christopher B., 2017. "Ten striking facts about agricultural input use in Sub-Saharan Africa," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 12-25.
    3. Wätzold, Marlene Yu Lilin & Abdulai, Issaka & Cooke, Amanda & Krumbiegel, Katharina & Ocampo-Ariza, Carolina & Wenzel, Arne & Wollni, Meike, 2025. "Do voluntary sustainability standards improve socioeconomic and ecological outcomes? Evidence from Ghana's cocoa sector," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    4. Sarah Alobo Loison, 2015. "Rural Livelihood Diversification in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Literature Review," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(9), pages 1125-1138, September.
    5. Charry, Andrés & Perea, Carolay & Ramírez, Karen & Zambrano, Guillermo & Yovera, Fredy & Santos, Adriana & Jiménez, Tito & Romero, Miguel & Lundy, Mark & Quintero, Marcela & Pulleman, Mirjam, 2025. "The bittersweet economics of different cacao production systems in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Call, Maia & Gray, Clark & Jagger, Pamela, 2019. "Smallholder responses to climate anomalies in rural Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 132-144.
    2. Makate, Clifton & Angelsen, Arild & Holden, Stein Terje & Westengen, Ola Tveitereid, 2022. "Crops in crises: Shocks shape smallholders' diversification in rural Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Kamaldeen Mohammed & Evans Batung & Moses Kansanga & Hanson Nyantakyi-Frimpong & Isaac Luginaah, 2021. "Livelihood diversification strategies and resilience to climate change in semi-arid northern Ghana," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Tesfaye, Wondimagegn & Tirivayi, Nyasha, 2020. "Crop diversity, household welfare and consumption smoothing under risk: Evidence from rural Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Fredrick Bagamba & Proscovia R. Ntakyo & Geoffrey Otim & David J. Spielman & Bjorn Van Campenhout, 2023. "Policy and performance in Uganda's seed sector: Opportunities and challenges," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(3), May.
    6. Edward John Nyamamu & Credo Simbert Nchimbi & Shakila Halifan Mteti & Gabriel Kanuti Ndimbo, 2025. "Potentials and Challenges for Rural Livelihood Diversification and Poverty Alleviation in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, October.
    7. Ahmad, Babor & Rabbani, M. Golam & Shilpa, Nusrat Afrin & Haque, Mohammad Samiul & Rahman, M. Naimur, . "Diversification of livelihoods and its impact on the welfare of tribal households in Dinajpur district of Bangladesh," Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 43(01).
    8. Azfar Khan & Faisal Buyinza, 2020. "Living Wage Benchmark Report: Rural Uganda, Lake Victoria Basin (September 2020)," Global Living Wage Coalition (GLWC) 20-01-02, Universidad Privada Boliviana.
    9. Amankwah,Akuffo & Ambel,Alemayehu A. & Gourlay,Sydney & Kilic,Talip & Markhof,Yannick Valentin & Wollburg,Philip Randolph, 2024. "Fertilizer Price Shocks in Smallholder Agriculture : Cross-Country Evidence from High-Frequency Phone Surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10842, The World Bank.
    10. Alobo Loison, Sarah & Hillbom, Ellen, 2020. "Regional evidence of smallholder-based growth in Zambia’s livestock sector," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    11. Walelign,Solomon Zena & Wang Sonne,Soazic Elise & Seshan,Ganesh Kumar, 2022. "Livelihood Impacts of Refugees on Host Communities : Evidence from Ethiopia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10044, The World Bank.
    12. Khushbu Mishra & Abdoul G. Sam & Gracious M. Diiro & Mario J. Miranda, 2020. "Gender and the dynamics of technology adoption: Empirical evidence from a household‐level panel data," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(6), pages 857-870, November.
    13. Takeshima, Hiroyuki & Hatzenbuehler, Patrick L. & Edeh, Hyacinth O., 2020. "Effects of agricultural mechanization on economies of scope in crop production in Nigeria," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    14. Raymond Boadi Frempong, 2023. "Do subsidies on seed and fertilizer lead to child labour? Evidence from Malawi," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(2), March.
    15. Jithitikulchai, Theepakorn, 2023. "The effect of climate change and agricultural diversification on the total value of agricultural output of farm households in Sub-Saharan Africa," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 18(02), October.
    16. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:7430-7437 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Berazneva, Julia & McBride, Linden & Sheahan, Megan & Güereña, David, 2018. "Empirical assessment of subjective and objective soil fertility metrics in east Africa: Implications for researchers and policy makers," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 367-382.
    18. Richard Anker & Martha Anker, 2016. "Living Wage Benchmark Report: Urban Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh City (March 2016)," Global Living Wage Coalition (GLWC) 16-01-02, Universidad Privada Boliviana.
    19. Lykke E. Andersen & Richard Anker & Martha Anker, 2018. "Living Wage Benchmark Report: Caribbean coast of Colombia (May 2018)," Global Living Wage Coalition (GLWC) 18-01-01, Universidad Privada Boliviana.
    20. Isabel Lambrecht & Monica Schuster & Sarah Asare Samwini & Laura Pelleriaux, 2018. "Changing gender roles in agriculture? Evidence from 20 years of data in Ghana," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(6), pages 691-710, November.
    21. Fujimoto, Takefumi & Suzuki, Aya, 2021. "Do Fertilizer and Seed Subsidies Strengthen Farmers' Market Participation? the Impact of Tanzania NAIVS on Farmers' Purchase of Agricultural Inputs and Their Maize-Selling Activities," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315044, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc143181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.