IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Polarization, growth and social policy. The case of Israel, 1997 to 2008

Listed author(s):
  • Rosa García-Fernández


    (University of Granada)

  • Daniel Gottlieb


    (National Insurance Institute and Ben-Gurion University, Israel)

  • Federico Palacios-González


    (University of Granada)

In this paper we apply the methodology developed by García-Fernández and Palacios-González (2008,2009) based on multiresolution analysis, to the measurement of polarization to Israeli income data over the past decade. This methodology allows us, in contrast to other polarization measures, to detect sub-populations empirically as incomes concentrated around an optimal number of micropoles. Based on this procedure a polarization measure is developed, consisting of three components: an indicator of alienation and identification; the number of income classes and the distribution of the sizes of the groups. The proposed approach allows us to study polarization beyond mere income class membership, by including ethnic-cultural, individual, family and other demographic characteristics by means of a Probit analysis. The identification-alienation index fluctuated around two sub-periods - the first, showing an increase in identification-alienation from 2001 to 2004, coinciding with the harsh socio-economic policy during that period, and the second, showing a sharp decline, during the period of rapid economic growth (2005 to 2008). The increase in the size of the middle class - reducing polarization - and the decreasing number of classes - raising it - had offsetting effects on the overall index which has been relatively stable over the observation period. The Probit analysis reveals that belonging to the Haredi (Jewish Ultra-orthodox) community sharply raises their probability of belonging to the low income group. Being Arab yields a similar though less pronounced result. Furthermore, group-related characteristics of labor-force participation and small family size increase the chances of belonging to a higher income group.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality in its series Working Papers with number 191.

in new window

Length: 32 pages
Date of creation: 2011
Handle: RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2011-191
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2011-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Maria Ana Lugo)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.