IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Structural Change, Economic Growth and Trade: Case for Regional Reallocation of Investment in India


  • Alokesh Barua

    () (Centre for International Trade and development)

  • Aparna Sawhney

    () (Centre for International Trade and development)


The economic structure and rates of growth across the states in India are markedly different, with significant disparities in income per capita growth as well as sector-specific performance. The high-income states have typically led the Indian growth story with their high growth rates, while regional inequality continues to increase. The recent policy focus in India has been to encourage inclusive growth across sectors and disparate regions within the country through development of core public services (water, education, transport, healthcare, etc), especially in the poor and special status states. To understand the structural challenges facing India, it is important to understand which economic sectors have been the most critical in driving regional inequality over the years and how these sectors impact economic growth. Given the new thrust in developmental capital expenditure in the special states (with special economic incentives to help enhance economic growth) and poorer states to boost economic well-being, it is pertinent to evaluate whether such public expenditure has helped alleviating inequality and triggered structural change. We use income and disaggregated sector-specific output data of 31 Indian states and union territories to examine the structural change experienced over the last three decades from 1980 through 2008. Considering the major regime shift implemented in India through economic reforms of deregulation and liberalization during the early-1990s, we also determine how this impacted the structural performance and regional disparity in the country. We examine these relationships in an augmented Chenery-Syrquin model, and test whether the state capital and development expenditure has had structural impact and whether it has lowered regional inequality. We find at the macro level, India experienced higher economic growth with increasing inequality in both the agricultural and the manufacturing sector during 1980-2008, however, as the disaggregated regional growth analysis reveals, at the micro-level, the states with higher agricultural and manufacturing orientation enjoyed higher average economic growth. The high growth states also gained in the post-reform period, indicating that laggard states have lost out even on the trade front due to their structural backwardness. Our estimated Chenery model indicates that liberalization has had significant positive impact on services share in state output, but no significant manufacturing orientation. Moreover, state capital/ development expenditure has also had no significant effect on the manufacturing –orientation of the states, and indeed inequality has further increased for the special states. The special states have increased their service-orientation even as their manufacturing share significantly declined in the last two decades. We conclude that although the state development expenditure can play a critical role in reducing regional disparity, the special status poorer states have failed to utilize state development investment to trigger structural economic change and reduce regional inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Alokesh Barua & Aparna Sawhney, "undated". "Structural Change, Economic Growth and Trade: Case for Regional Reallocation of Investment in India," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 10-06, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
  • Handle: RePEc:ind:citdwp:10-06

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. R. Nagaraj & A. Varoudakis & M.-A. Véganzonès, 2000. "Long-run growth trends and convergence across Indian States," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(1), pages 45-70.
    2. Robert Dorfman, 1963. "Regional Allocation of Investment: Comment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 77(1), pages 162-165.
    3. María Teresa Ramírez & Hadi Salehi Esfahani, 1999. "Infrastructure and Economic Growth," Borradores de Economia 123, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    4. F. H. Hahn, 1963. "A Comment," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 191-191.
    5. Anisur Rahman, 1966. "Regional Allocation of Investment: The Continuous Version," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 80(1), pages 159-160.
    6. M. L. Weitzman, 1970. "Optimal Growth with Scale Economies in the Creation of Overhead Capital," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(4), pages 555-570.
    7. Kaliappa Kalirajan & Shashanka Bhide & Kanhaiya Singh, 2009. "Development Performance Across Indian States and The Role of the Governments," ASARC Working Papers 2009-05, The Australian National University, Australia South Asia Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Naranpanawa, Athula & Arora, Rashmi, 2014. "Does Trade Liberalization Promote Regional Disparities? Evidence from a Multiregional CGE Model of India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 339-349.
    2. Devasmita Jena & Alokesh Barua, "undated". "Does Trade, Structural Transformation and Income Convergence: Empirical Evidence from the EU and the ASEAN," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 18-04, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ind:citdwp:10-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamprasad M. Pujar). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.