IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Why is 100% Reserve Banking Inefficient?

Listed author(s):
  • Gurbachan Singh


    (Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi)

Registered author(s):

    Financial crises are an important concern today. One part of the problem is banking crises, at the root of which is the bank run problem. One solution is 100% reserve banking. But this is inefficient. The reasons are, however, not obvious. The literature on bank runs following Diamond and Dybvig (1983) is based on banks? role in consumption smoothing. However, the earlier (rich) literature is based on banks? role in issuing deposits, which are a component of money and are a source of credit. In this context, a high reserve ratio for commercial banks obviously decreases commercial bank credit. However, in general, it does not decrease total credit. Despite this, 100% reserve banking is inefficient if competitive banks have a comparative advantage over the central bank in providing credit. The paper ends by examining the implications of a decrease in gold reserves held by the central banks.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India in its series Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers with number 09-07.

    in new window

    Length: 25 pages
    Date of creation:
    Handle: RePEc:ind:citdwp:09-07
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Peter E. Kennedy, 2000. "Eight Reasons Why Real versus Nominal Interest Rates Is the Most Important Concept in Macroeconomics Principles Courses," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(2), pages 81-84, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ind:citdwp:09-07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamprasad M. Pujar)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.