IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/wp01747.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of Claims and Reimbursements made under Mediclaim Policy of the General Insurance Corporation of India

Author

Listed:
  • Reuben Elan
  • Bhat Ramesh

Abstract

Mediclaim insurance run by government owned insurance company General Insurance Corporation of India (GIC) is the only private voluntary health insurance scheme available in India currently. This scheme has been in operation since 1986 and from time to time a number of revisions have been carried out to address the needs of their clients. The documentation on claims and reimbursement of this scheme is scanty. This paper analyses 621 claims and reimbursements data pertaining to policy initiation years 1997-98 and 1998-99 of Ahmedabad branch of one of the subsidiary companies of the General Insurance Corporation of India. The analysis suggests that the number of policies and premiums collected have grown at significant rates, more than 30 per cent during 1998-99 and 50 per cent during the year 1999-00. The growth had implications for the management of scheme in terms of problems of adverse selection or provider induced demand and falling premiums per insured person. It was found that the number of claims increased by about 93 per cent during the year 1998-99 when polices sold grew at 32 per cent. The study estimates that about 1/3rd of claim amount increase is because of the problems of adverse selection or provider induced demand. The analysis of break-up of reimbursements suggests that about 40 per cent of reimbursements are made towards doctors fees. This is followed by diagnostic charges, which accounts for about 30 per cent. This makes the insurance claims highly vulnerable to provider-induced use of resources. The findings also suggest that the insurance company took on an average 121 days to settle the claim. It is pointed out given the demand side and supply side imperfections in the healthcare markets and absence of appropriate regulatory mechanisms in place, the Insurance and Development Regulatory Authoritys proposal to ensure payment settlement within 7 days is highly ambitious. The study also analyses reasons for the delay and cases where reimbursements have been less than claims submitted.

Suggested Citation

  • Reuben Elan & Bhat Ramesh, 2001. "Analysis of Claims and Reimbursements made under Mediclaim Policy of the General Insurance Corporation of India," IIMA Working Papers WP2001-08-02, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp01747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iima.ac.in/sites/default/files/rnpfiles/2001-08-02RameshBhat.pdf
    File Function: English Version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ellis, Randall P. & McGuire, Thomas G., 1996. "Hospital response to prospective payment: Moral hazard, selection, and practice-style effects," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 257-277, June.
    2. Joseph P. Newhouse, 1996. "Reimbursing Health Plans and Health Providers: Efficiency in Production versus Selection," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 1236-1263, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cots, Francesc & Elvira, David & Castells, Xavier & Dalmau, Eulalia, 2000. "Medicare's DRG-weights in a European environment: the Spanish experience," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 31-47, February.
    2. Sonja Ossig & Eberhard Feess, 2004. "The impact of liability for malpractice on the optimal reimbursement schemes for health services," Econometric Society 2004 Far Eastern Meetings 396, Econometric Society.
    3. Cutler, David M. & Zeckhauser, Richard J., 2000. "The anatomy of health insurance," Handbook of Health Economics, in: A. J. Culyer & J. P. Newhouse (ed.), Handbook of Health Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 11, pages 563-643, Elsevier.
    4. Garcia-Lacalle, Javier & Martin, Emilio, 2010. "Rural vs urban hospital performance in a 'competitive' public health service," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(6), pages 1131-1140, September.
    5. Mingshan Lu & Ching‐to Albert Ma & Lasheng Yuan, 2003. "Risk selection and matching in performance‐based contracting," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(5), pages 339-354, May.
    6. Boyd H. Gilman, 2000. "Hospital response to DRG refinements: the impact of multiple reimbursement incentives on inpatient length of stay," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(4), pages 277-294, June.
    7. Feess, Eberhard & Ossig, Sonja, 2007. "Reimbursement schemes for hospitals, malpractice liability, and intrinsic motivation," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 423-441, December.
    8. Tsuyoshi Takahara, 2016. "Patient dumping, outlier payments, and optimal healthcare payment policy under asymmetric information," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Waitzberg, Ruth & Gerkens, Sophie & Dimova, Antoniya & Bryndová, Lucie & Vrangbæk, Karsten & Jervelund, Signe Smith & Birk, Hans Okkels & Rajan, Selina & Habicht, Triin & Tynkkynen, Liina-Kaisa & Kesk, 2022. "Balancing financial incentives during COVID-19: A comparison of provider payment adjustments across 20 countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(5), pages 398-407.
    10. Aoife Brick & Anne Nolan & Jacqueline O’Reilly & Samantha Smith, 2012. "Conflicting Financial Incentives in the Irish Health-Care System," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 43(2), pages 273-301.
    11. Nazmi Sari, 2002. "Do competition and managed care improve quality?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(7), pages 571-584, October.
    12. Bowblis John R. & Brunt Christopher S. & Grabowski David C., 2016. "Competitive Spillovers and Regulatory Exploitation by Skilled Nursing Facilities," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 45-70, June.
    13. Lise Rochaix, 2004. "Les modes de rémunération des médecins," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 76(3), pages 223-239.
    14. Allen C. Goodman & Miron Stano, 2000. "Hmos and Health Externalities: A Local Public Good Perspective," Public Finance Review, , vol. 28(3), pages 247-269, May.
    15. Barros, Pedro Pita, 2003. "Cream-skimming, incentives for efficiency and payment system," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 419-443, May.
    16. Schmid, Christian P.R. & Beck, Konstantin, 2016. "Re-insurance in the Swiss health insurance market: Fit, power, and balance," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(7), pages 848-855.
    17. Ching‐To Albert Ma & Michael H. Riordan, 2002. "Health Insurance, Moral Hazard, and Managed Care," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(1), pages 81-107, March.
    18. Howell, Bronwyn, 2006. "Unveiling 'Invisible Hands': Two-Sided Platforms in Health Care Markets," Working Paper Series 18936, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    19. James M. Malcomson, 2005. "Supplier Discretion Over Provision: Theory and an Application to Medical Care," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 36(2), pages 412-429, Summer.
    20. Diane Alexander, 2017. "How do Doctors Respond to Incentives? Unintended Consequences of Paying Doctors to Reduce Costs," Working Paper Series WP-2017-9, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp01747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.