IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

How has the Indian Corporate Sector Responded to Two Decades of Economic Reforms in India? An Exploration of Patterns and Trends

Listed author(s):
  • Basant, Rakesh
  • Mishra, Pulak
Registered author(s):

    In the context of various policy initiatives made during the last two decades to reform the Indian economy in general and corporate sector in particular, the present paper attempts to assess how the firms have responded to these policy measures and the resultant changes in the business conditions in a long run perspective. The paper finds that although the rate of growth of the Indian industry sector has not accelerated following economic reforms probably due to slow growth in agriculture and industrial productivity, investment in general and FDI in particular have shown considerable increase. Increase in competitive pressures during this period has forced the firms to adopt a variety of strategies. While reliance on mergers and acquisitions (M&A) has increased to restructure business and grow, the role of embodied and disembodied technology purchase has declined with firms relying somewhat more on in-house R&D. On the other hand, although strategies of building marketing and distribution related complementary assets continue to dominate the strategy of product differentiation, their role in a relative sense seems to have declined as these expenses as a proportion of sales show a declining trend. However, the emerging competitive pressures have raised the importance of sub-contracting/ outsourcing manufacturing, reducing the degrees of vertical integration. Interestingly, while cost-efficiencies do not show improvements, export orientation has increased across the industries significantly signaling enhanced global competitiveness of Indian firms, although imports have risen faster than exports. Overall, the observed trends of corporate response to economic reforms are interesting, but one need to systematically explore how M&A led consolidation and flows of FDI are linked to the adoption of various non-price strategies relating to technology and product differentiation. As economic reform deepens and competitive pressures build up, an analysis of these interactions would provide useful insights for understanding corporate behaviour and for making policy choices.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: English Version
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department in its series IIMA Working Papers with number WP2012-02-02.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 29 Feb 2012
    Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:11432
    Contact details of provider: Phone: 91 79 2630 7241
    Fax: 91 79 2630 6896
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Kokko, Ari, 1994. "Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 279-293, April.
    2. Nagesh KUMAR, 2008. "Internationalization of Indian Enterprises: Patterns, Strategies, Ownership Advantages, and Implications," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 3(2), pages 242-261.
    3. Habib, M. & Zurawicki, L., 2001. "Country-level investments and the effect of corruption -- some empirical evidence," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 10(6), pages 687-700, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:11432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.