IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/86-soc-2019.html

Sensitivity Of Goodness Of Fit Indices To Lack Of Measurement Invariance With Categorical Indicators And Many Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Boris Sokolov

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

Using Monte Carlo simulation experiments, this paper examines the performance of popular SEM goodness-of-fit indices, namely CFI, TLI, RMSEA, and SRMR, with respect to a specific task of measurement invariance testing with categorical data and many groups (10-50 groups). Study factors include the number of groups, the level of non-invariance in the data, and the absence/presence of model misspecifications other than non-invariance. In sum, the study design yields a total of 81 conditions. All simulated data sets are analyzed using two popular SEM estimators, MLR and WLSMV. The main contribution of this paper to the methodological literature on cross-cultural survey research is that it produces revised guidelines for evaluating the goodness of fit of invariance MGCFA models with many groups

Suggested Citation

  • Boris Sokolov, 2019. "Sensitivity Of Goodness Of Fit Indices To Lack Of Measurement Invariance With Categorical Indicators And Many Groups," HSE Working papers WP BRP 86/SOC/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:86/soc/2019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wp.hse.ru/data/2019/07/09/1480015921/86SOC2019.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stegmueller, Daniel, 2011. "Apples and Oranges? The Problem of Equivalence in Comparative Research," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 471-487.
    2. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E M & Baumgartner, Hans, 1998. "Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(1), pages 78-90, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dmitriy Poznyak & Bart Meuleman & Koen Abts & George Bishop, 2014. "Trust in American Government: Longitudinal Measurement Equivalence in the ANES, 1964–2008," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 741-758, September.
    2. Büchi, Moritz, 2016. "Measurement invariance in comparative Internet use research," MediArXiv 42h39, Center for Open Science.
    3. T. W. G. Meer & E. Ouattara, 2019. "Putting ‘political’ back in political trust: an IRT test of the unidimensionality and cross-national equivalence of political trust measures," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(6), pages 2983-3002, November.
    4. Tsukasa Kato, 2021. "Measurement Invariance in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) Scale among English-Speaking Whites and Asians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-10, May.
    5. Janina Isabel Steinert & Lucie Dale Cluver & G. J. Melendez-Torres & Sebastian Vollmer, 2018. "One Size Fits All? The Validity of a Composite Poverty Index Across Urban and Rural Households in South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 51-72, February.
    6. Yeung, Matthew C.H. & Ramasamy, Bala & Chen, Junsong & Paliwoda, Stan, 2013. "Customer satisfaction and consumer expenditure in selected European countries," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 406-416.
    7. Matanda, Margaret Jekanyika & Freeman, Susan, 2009. "Effect of perceived environmental uncertainty on exporter-importer inter-organisational relationships and export performance improvement," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 89-107, February.
    8. Stefkovics, Ádám & Krekó, Péter & Koltai, Júlia, 2024. "When reality knocks on the door. The effect of conspiracy beliefs on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and the moderating role of experience with the virus," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    9. Alessandra Martinelli & Giulia Moncalieri & Manuel Zamparini & Guido Alessandri & Gian Vittorio Caprara & Gianluca Castelnuovo & Matteo Rocchetti & Fabrizio Starace & Cristina Zarbo & Giovanni de Giro, 2024. "Positivity, daily time use, mood, and functioning in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: Results from the diapason multicentric study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 70(2), pages 319-329, March.
    10. Fritz, Wolfgang & Graf, Andrea & Hentze, Joachim & Möllenberg, Antje, 2003. "A replication study of the Chen/Starosta-Model of intercultural sensitivity in Germany and the USA," Working Papers 03/06, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institute of Marketing.
    11. Scheible, Jana Anne & Fleischmann, Fenella, 2011. "Geschlechterunterschiede in islamischer Religiosität und Geschlechterrollenwerten: Ein Vergleich der Zusammenhänge am Beispiel der türkischen und marokkanischen zweiten Generation in Belgien," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Migration, Integration, Transnationalization SP IV 2011-702, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    12. Jean, Ruey Jer “Bryan” & Kim, Daekwan & Bello, Daniel C., 2017. "Relationship-based product innovations: Evidence from the global supply chain," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 127-140.
    13. Bernard Dubois & Sandor Czellar & Gilles Laurent, 2005. "Consumer Segments Based on Attitudes Toward Luxury: Empirical Evidence from Twenty Countries," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 115-128, April.
    14. Martijn G. de Jong & Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp & Bernard P. Veldkamp, 2009. "A Model for the Construction of Country-Specific Yet Internationally Comparable Short-Form Marketing Scales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 674-689, 07-08.
    15. Yoo, Jungmin & Park, Minjung, 2016. "The effects of e-mass customization on consumer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty toward luxury brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5775-5784.
    16. Gentina, Élodie & Chandon, Jean-Louis, 2013. "Adolescent shopping behaviour: Different assimilation and individuation needs in France and the United States," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 609-616.
    17. Osorio, María Lucila & Centeno-Velázquez, Edgar & López-Pérez, María Eugenia & del Castillo, Ernesto, 2021. "Authenticity, fit and product type: Testing a celebrity brand extension model cross-culturally," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    18. Shahid, Shadma & Adil, Mohd & Sadiq, Mohd & Dash, Ganesh, 2024. "Why do consumers consume masstige products? A cross-cultural investigation through the lens of self-determination theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    19. Elke Cabooter & Bert Weijters & Alain Beuckelaer & Eldad Davidov, 2017. "Is extreme response style domain specific? Findings from two studies in four countries," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2605-2622, November.
    20. Andreas Engelen & Jan Kemper & Malte Brettel, 2010. "Die Wirkung von operativen Marketing-Mix-Fähigkeiten auf den Unternehmenserfolg — Ein 4-Länder-Vergleich," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 62(7), pages 710-743, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:86/soc/2019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.