On the problem of optimal inference for time heterogeneous data with error components regression structure
Time heterogeneity, or the fact that subjects are measured at different times, occurs frequently in non-experimental situations. For time heterogeneous data having error components regression structure it is demonstrated that under customary normality assumptions there is no estimation method based on Maximum Likelihood, Least Squares, Within-subject or Between-subject comparisons that is generally superior when estimating the slope of the regression line. However, in some situations it is possible to give guidelines for the choice of an optimal procedure. These are expressed in terms of the variability of the times for the measurements and also of the inter-subject correlation. The results are demonstrated on data from a longitudinal medical study.
|Date of creation:||29 Oct 2003|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, Box 640, SE 405 30 GÖTEBORG, Sweden|
Phone: 031-773 10 00
Web page: http://www.handels.gu.se/econ/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Petzold, Max & Jonsson, Robert, 2003. "Maximum Likelihood Ratio based small-sample tests for random coefficients in linear regression," Working Papers in Economics 102, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
- Taylor, William E., 1980. "Small sample considerations in estimation from panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 203-223, June.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marie Andersson)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.