IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Training the Nation's Elite: National - Private Sector Differences in Japanese University Education

National and private universities in Japan differ in several ways, but perhaps the most notable distinction is that national universities are generally viewed as providing higher quality of education in comparison to private universities. This view is rooted in the history and the foundations under which national universities were founded in Japan an institution to educate the nation's elite and a recruiting ground for government ministries.Do such national-private sector distinctions impact the occupational outcomes of Japanese university graduates? If so, in what ways? Using a 1995 cross-sectional survey of Japanese workers, this paper examines in detail, the employment distribution and the rate of return to Japanese university graduates with respect to national-private sector differences. In order to examine quality differences between and among national and private universities, I construct the quality variable proxied by the mean scores of the entrance examinations of the universities attended by the survey respondents.My main findings show that: (i) Earnings are an increasing function of university quality; (ii) On average, the quality of national universities are higher; (iii) National university graduates are more likely to be employed in the government sector; and (iv) Because of (i) and (ii) coupled by the lower tuition, national university graduates have a higher internal rate of return (IRR) to their education. My findings lend support to the 'elite' perspective proposed by Becker (1993), under which higher ability individuals (in this case national university graduates) have more to gain from university education than lower ability individuals.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://swopec.hhs.se/eijswp/papers/eijswp0096.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by The European Institute of Japanese Studies in its series EIJS Working Paper Series with number 96.

as
in new window

Length: 31 pages
Date of creation: 01 Jul 2000
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published in Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 2008, pages 341-356.
Handle: RePEc:hhs:eijswp:0096
Contact details of provider: Postal: The European Institute of Japanese Studies, Stockholm School of Economics, P.O. Box 6501, 113 83 Stockholm, Sweden
Phone: +46-8-7369360
Fax: +46-8-313017
Web page: http://www.hhs.se/en/Research/Institutes/EIJS/
Email:


More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Publishing House "SINERGIA PRESS", vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:eijswp:0096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nanhee Lee)

The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Nanhee Lee to update the entry or send us the correct address

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.