IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhb/uufewp/9508.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Business network connections and the atmosphere of dyadic business relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Blankenburg Holm, Désirée
  • Johanson, Jan

Abstract

Based on exchange network theory and business network concepts this paper hypothesizes that five kinds of network connections affect three different dimensions of the atmosphere of dyadic business relationships. In other relationship studies these atmosphere dimensions have been regarded as important links between relationship antecedent and outcome variables. The results of our empirical study demonstrate that network connections have significant effects on the business relationship atmosphere. It also shows that different connections have different effects on four different atmosphere dimensions. The results indicate that relationship strategies have to be designed differently depending on the business network contexts. During the last decade a number of studies have contributed to our understanding of interfirm relationships in business markets (Anderson and Narus 1990; Anderson and Weitz 1989; Dwyer, Schurr and Oh 1987; Frazier 1983; Håkansson 1982; Hallén, Johanson and Seyed-Mohamed 1991; Heide and John 1988; Morgan and Hunt 1994). Typically those studies have analysed the continuity of the dyadic relations against the background of characteristics of the parties and the products exchanged. It has been suggested, however, that dyadic relations in business markets do not exist in isolation but are connected to each other and can fruitfully be considered within a network context (Achrol, Reve and Stern 1983; Anderson, Håkansson, and Johanson 1994, Baker 1990; Gadde and Mattsson 1987; Iacobucci and Hopkins 1992; Thorelli 1986; Webster 1993). The underlying assumption is that the commitment of a firm to a dyadic relationship to some extent is contingent on the firm’s involvement in relationships with other parties. Case studies have provided a number of examples of the impact of the surrounding network on single dyadic business relationships (Forsgren and Olsson 1992; Hertz 1993; Lee 1991). But so far no empirical studies have been reported about more general impacts of networks on dyadic relations. This paper is an attempt to study empirically some important aspects of business relationships and their network connections in such a way that it would be possible to analyse the impact of the network. The first section outlines the theoretical conceptualizations of relationships and networks employed. The second section describes how the concepts have been operationalized and how data have been collected and analysed. The third section shows the empirical results of the study. In the final section the results are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Blankenburg Holm, Désirée & Johanson, Jan, 1995. "Business network connections and the atmosphere of dyadic business relationships," Working Papers 1995:8, Uppsala University, Department of Business Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhb:uufewp:9508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-2367
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erin Anderson & Barton Weitz, 1989. "Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 310-323.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manolis, Chris & Nygaard, Arne & Stillerud, Bård, 1997. "Uncertainty and vertical control: An international investigation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 501-518, October.
    2. Chia-Hsin Chiang & Helen Choy & Yan-Jie Yang & Shu-Ling Yeh, 2025. "Strategic alignment between supply chain partners and cost stickiness of suppliers," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 941-999, February.
    3. Zur, Andrew & Leckie, Civilai & Webster, Cynthia M., 2012. "Cognitive and affective trust between Australian exporters and their overseas buyers," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 73-79.
    4. Hoang Linh VU & Dominique BONET FERNANDEZ, 2014. "Proposition d’un modèle de relations producteur-distributeur : une application à la gestion des conflits en contexte interculturel," Working Papers 2014-231, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    5. Yadong Luo & Yi Liu & Jiaqi Xue, 2009. "Relationship Investment and Channel Performance: An Analysis of Mediating Forces," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(7), pages 1113-1137, November.
    6. Artz, Kendall W. & Brush, Thomas H., 2000. "Asset specificity, uncertainty and relational norms: an examination of coordination costs in collaborative strategic alliances," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 337-362, April.
    7. Gatignon, Aline & Gatignon, Hubert, 2010. "Erin Anderson and the Path Breaking Work of TCE in New Areas of Business Research: Transaction Costs in Action," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 232-247.
    8. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4215 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Inman, J. Jeffrey & Nikolova, Hristina, 2017. "Shopper-Facing Retail Technology: A Retailer Adoption Decision Framework Incorporating Shopper Attitudes and Privacy Concerns," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 7-28.
    10. Bauer, Florian & King, David & Matzler, Kurt, 2016. "Speed of acquisition integration: Separating the role of human and task integration," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 150-165.
    11. Erik Mooi & Qiong Wang & Steven Seggie & Sandy D. Jap, 2024. "The show must go on: The role of contract frames in safeguarding relationship continuity," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 1842-1858, November.
    12. Pennings, Joost M. E., 2004. "A marketing-finance approach towards industrial channel contract relationships: a model and application," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 601-609, June.
    13. Ferenc Farkas & Giora Avny, 2005. "Cross-Cultural Issues of International Joint Ventures: A Viewpoint from Israel," Proceedings-3rd International Conference on Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking (MEB 2005),, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    14. Sandy D. Jap & Erin Anderson, 2003. "Safeguarding Interorganizational Performance and Continuity Under Ex Post Opportunism," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(12), pages 1684-1701, December.
    15. Shih-Wei Chou & Chia-Shiang Hsu, 2016. "Understanding online repurchase intention: social exchange theory and shopping habit," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 19-45, February.
    16. Beugelsdijk, S. & Koen, C.I. & Noorderhaven, N.G., 2004. "Organizational Culture and Relationship Skills," Other publications TiSEM 29a52938-acd6-4261-841f-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Nikolchenko, Natalia & Lebedeva, Anastasia, 2017. "Integrative Approach to Supply Chain Collaboration in Distribution Networks: Impact on Firm Performance," Conference Papers 10462, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    18. repec:dgr:rugsom:03g23 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Varela-Neira, Concepción & Araujo, Marisa del Río & Sanmartín, Emilio Ruzo, 2018. "How and when a salesperson's perception of organizational politics relates to proactive performance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 660-670.
    20. Biong, Harald & Selnes, Fred, 1995. "Relational selling behavior and skills in long-term industrial buyer-seller relationships," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 483-498.
    21. Herington, Carmel & Johnson, Lester W. & Scott, Don, 2009. "Firm-employee relationship strength--A conceptual model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 1096-1107, November.
    22. Ojha, Divesh & Shockley, Jeff & Acharya, Chandan, 2016. "Supply chain organizational infrastructure for promoting entrepreneurial emphasis and innovativeness: The role of trust and learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 212-227.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhb:uufewp:9508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sune Karlsson (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.fek.uu.se/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.