IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-03632459.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Vers une performance écologique des activités en mer : Quels apprentissages tirer des entreprises maritimes innovantes de la transition ?

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Bigard

    (AgroParisTech, MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Charlotte Michel
  • Maya Leroy

    (MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - UM - Université de Montpellier, AgroParisTech)

Abstract

La transition écologique suppose une modification de notre mode de fonctionnement. Toutefois, cette modification peut aller d'une légère évolution à une réelle mutation. C'est ce gradient des activités que nous proposons d'analyser à travers ce projet. Dans un contexte où la maritimisation de l'économie doit s'articuler avec un développement plus durable des activités en mer, la notion de transition écologique est sous le feu des projecteurs. C'est pourquoi, dans cette étude, nous nous intéressons en particulier au jeunes TPE/PME, créées à partir de 2008 et donc après l'essor du concept de transition écologique, dont l'activité est liée à la mer, et qui se disent "de la transition". Ce projet est un projet court (1 an), dont les résultats sont issus de l'analyse de 25 entreprises à travers des entretiens qualitatifs et un workshop. Nous avons notamment pu montrer que : -La transition est un leitmotiv affiché par les entrepreneurs mais les définitions sous-jacentes varient. -Selon les critères de l'Allier et Audet (2020) : les entreprises peuvent être groupées en 3 grands types : les entreprises « du régime », se revendiquant de la transition mais dont le fonctionnement est basé sur la recherche de gain économique avant tout ; les entreprises « ambivalentes », proposant une réflexion en lien avec la transition, mais dont les caractéristiques traduisent une faible performance écologique et les entreprises « de la transition », engagées dans un modèle économique ou dans une production faisant rupture avec le régime notamment au regard des enjeux écologiques. -Il est possible de définir des trajectoires de la transition pour chacun des objectifs environnementaux recensés, à savoir, l'énergie, les déchets, la biodiversité. Ces trajectoires peuvent être plus ou moins performantes d'un point de vue écologique. -Un certain nombre de limites organisationnelles et d'opportunités ont enfin été recensées et discutées. Enfin, nous mettons en avant l'intérêt de réunir des informations sur les 4 volets suivants : 1) communication, 2) vision de l'entrepreneur, 3) productions/services proposés, 4) actions menées par l'entreprise, pour pouvoir prétendre à une évaluation de la participation de chaque entreprise à la transition écologique.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Bigard & Charlotte Michel & Maya Leroy, 2022. "Vers une performance écologique des activités en mer : Quels apprentissages tirer des entreprises maritimes innovantes de la transition ?," Working Papers hal-03632459, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03632459
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03632459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03632459/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Aghion & Céline Antonin & Bunel Simon, 2020. "Le Pouvoir de la destruction créatrice," Post-Print halshs-02987990, HAL.
    2. Jocelyne Bendriss & Bertrand Lavayssière & Mark Tilden, 2014. "Le financement des PME en France : un contexte particulier, favorable aux innovations," Revue d'économie financière, Association d'économie financière, vol. 0(2), pages 241-254.
    3. Geels, Frank W., 2002. "Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8-9), pages 1257-1274, December.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5165 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Albert David, 2002. "Décision, conception et recherche en sciences de gestion," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(3), pages 173-185.
    6. Bishop, John Douglas, 2012. "The Limits of Corporate Human Rights Obligations and the Rights of For-Profit Corporations," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 119-144, January.
    7. Martine Spence & Jouhaina Ben Boubaker Gherib & Viviane Ondoua Biwolé, 2011. "Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Is Entrepreneurial will Enough? A North–South Comparison," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(3), pages 335-367, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew P. Johnson & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development: A Review and Multilevel Causal Mechanism Framework," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(6), pages 1141-1173, November.
    2. Fábio T. F. Silva & Alexandre Szklo & Amanda Vinhoza & Ana Célia Nogueira & André F. P. Lucena & Antônio Marcos Mendonça & Camilla Marcolino & Felipe Nunes & Francielle M. Carvalho & Isabela Tagomori , 2022. "Inter-sectoral prioritization of climate technologies: insights from a Technology Needs Assessment for mitigation in Brazil," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 1-39, October.
    3. John A. Mathews, 2020. "Schumpeterian economic dynamics of greening: propagation of green eco-platforms," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 929-948, September.
    4. Wiegand, Julia, 2017. "Dezentrale Stromerzeugung als Chance zur Stärkung der Energie-Resilienz: Eine qualitative Analyse kommunaler Strategien im Raum Unna," Wuppertaler Studienarbeiten zur nachhaltigen Entwicklung, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, volume 11, number 11.
    5. Oliver Wagner & Thomas Adisorn & Lena Tholen & Dagmar Kiyar, 2020. "Surviving the Energy Transition: Development of a Proposal for Evaluating Sustainable Business Models for Incumbents in Germany’s Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Jordi Molas-Gallart & Alejandra Boni & Sandro Giachi & Johan Schot, 2021. "A formative approach to the evaluation of Transformative Innovation Policies [The Need for Reflexive Evaluation Approaches in Development Cooperation]," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(4), pages 431-442.
    7. Capellán-Pérez, Iñigo & Campos-Celador, Álvaro & Terés-Zubiaga, Jon, 2018. "Renewable Energy Cooperatives as an instrument towards the energy transition in Spain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 215-229.
    8. Funcke, Simon & Bauknecht, Dierk, 2016. "Typology of centralised and decentralised visions for electricity infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 67-74.
    9. Pigford, Ashlee-Ann E. & Hickey, Gordon M. & Klerkx, Laurens, 2018. "Beyond agricultural innovation systems? Exploring an agricultural innovation ecosystems approach for niche design and development in sustainability transitions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 116-121.
    10. Pradeep Racherla & Munir Mandviwalla, 2013. "Moving from Access to Use of the Information Infrastructure: A Multilevel Sociotechnical Framework," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 709-730, September.
    11. Arman Avadikyan & Patrick Llerena, 2009. "Socio-technical transition processes: A real option based reasoning," Working Papers of BETA 2009-21, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    12. Ros, Jan & Nagelhout, Dick & Montfoort, Johanna, 2009. "New environmental policy for system innovation: Casus alternatives for fossil motor fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 243-250, February.
    13. Colvin, John & Blackmore, Chris & Chimbuya, Sam & Collins, Kevin & Dent, Mark & Goss, John & Ison, Ray & Roggero, Pier Paolo & Seddaiu, Giovanna, 2014. "In search of systemic innovation for sustainable development: A design praxis emerging from a decade of social learning inquiry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 760-771.
    14. Catia Milena Lopes & Annibal José Scavarda & Mauricio Nunes Macedo de Carvalho & André Luis Korzenowski, 2018. "The Business Model and Innovation Analyses: The Sustainable Transition Obstacles and Drivers for the Hospital Supply Chains," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. David Gibbs & Kirstie O'Neill, 2014. "Rethinking Sociotechnical Transitions and Green Entrepreneurship: The Potential for Transformative Change in the Green Building Sector," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(5), pages 1088-1107, May.
    16. Tiia-Lotta Pekkanen, 2021. "Institutions and Agency in the Sustainability of Day-to-Day Consumption Practices: An Institutional Ethnographic Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 241-260, January.
    17. Vibeke Grupe Larsen & Valentina Antoniucci & Nicola Tollin & Peter Andreas Sattrup & Krister Jens & Morten Birkved & Tine Holmboe & Giuliano Marella, 2023. "A Methodological Framework to Foster Social Value Creation in Architectural Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, January.
    18. Švarc, Jadranka & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "Transformative innovation policy or how to escape peripheral policy paradox in European research peripheral countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    19. Vincent-Paul Sanon & Raymond Ouedraogo & Patrice Toé & Hamid El Bilali & Erwin Lautsch & Stefan Vogel & Andreas H. Melcher, 2021. "Socio-Economic Perspectives of Transition in Inland Fisheries and Fish Farming in a Least Developed Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-34, March.
    20. Jacquet, Florence & Butault, Jean-Pierre & Guichard, Laurence, 2011. "An economic analysis of the possibility of reducing pesticides in French field crops," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1638-1648, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    mer; performance écologique; transition écologique; transition; entreprise; maritime; innovation;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03632459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.