IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-03247287.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Allocation des rendez-vous en ligne : un mécanisme pour décourager le trafic

Author

Listed:
  • Jeanne Hagenbach

    (ECON - Département d'économie (Sciences Po) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Dorothea Kübler

    (Der Technischen Universität Berlin, WZB - Berlin Social Science Center - Berlin Social Science Center)

Abstract

De nombreux rendez-vous administratifs sont aujourd'hui alloués en ligne sur des plateformes de réservation. Le système d'allocation fonctionne souvent selon le modèle du "1er arrivé, 1er servi", c'est-à-dire que les demandeurs se connectent à la plateforme et réservent les créneaux encore disponibles au moment de leur connexion. Dans plusieurs administrations et pays, il est apparu récemment que ce système est vulnérable au trafic de créneaux. Des trafiquants utilisent des bots pour réserver les créneaux plus rapidement que les demandeurs. Leur rapidité leur permet non seulement de capter tous les créneaux au moment de leur mise en ligne mais également d'y associer plus tard les identités de leurs clients, s'adaptant donc à la contrainte créée par les contrôles d'identités. Par leurs pratiques, les trafiquants brisent l'égalité d'accès au service public censée prévaloir. Sur la base du travail de Hakimov et al. (2021), nous présentons dans cette note un système alternatif d'allocation des créneaux qui décourage les trafiquants. Ce système simple fonctionne "par lots" : un lot de créneaux est mis en ligne. Les demandes pour ce lot sont collectées pendant une période donnée. A la fin de cette période, les créneaux sont alloués aléatoirement aux demandes collectées. Si un rendez-vous obtenu est annulé, il n'est pas remis en ligne directement mais alloué avec un des lots suivants. Dans ce système, les trafiquants ont les mêmes chances que les demandeurs d'obtenir un créneau, et ces derniers ne se tournent donc plus vers les trafiquants. Nous discutons brièvement des avantages que pourrait avoir un tel système en matière d'allocation des rendez-vous en préfecture pour les personnes étrangères.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeanne Hagenbach & Dorothea Kübler, 2021. "Allocation des rendez-vous en ligne : un mécanisme pour décourager le trafic," Post-Print halshs-03247287, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03247287
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03247287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03247287/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Budish & Peter Cramton & John Shim, 2015. "Editor's Choice The High-Frequency Trading Arms Race: Frequent Batch Auctions as a Market Design Response," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(4), pages 1547-1621.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Attar & Thomas Mariotti & François Salanié, 2021. "Entry-Proofness and Discriminatory Pricing under Adverse Selection," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(8), pages 2623-2659, August.
    2. Jason Allen & Milena Wittwer, 2023. "Centralizing Over-the-Counter Markets?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 131(12), pages 3310-3351.
    3. Scott Duke Kominers & Alexander Teytelboym & Vincent P Crawford, 2017. "An invitation to market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 541-571.
    4. Bellia, Mario & Christensen, Kim & Kolokolov, Aleksey & Pelizzon, Loriana & Renò, Roberto, 2022. "Do designated market makers provide liquidity during a flash crash?," SAFE Working Paper Series 270, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2022.
    5. Eduard Hartwich & Alexander Rieger & Johannes Sedlmeir & Dominik Jurek & Gilbert Fridgen, 2023. "Machine economies," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Saggese, Pietro & Belmonte, Alessandro & Dimitri, Nicola & Facchini, Angelo & Böhme, Rainer, 2023. "Arbitrageurs in the Bitcoin ecosystem: Evidence from user-level trading patterns in the Mt. Gox exchange platform," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 251-270.
    7. Aggarwal, Nidhi & Panchapagesan, Venkatesh & Thomas, Susan, 2023. "When is the order-to-trade ratio fee effective?," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    8. Jing Nie & Juliana Malagon & Julian Williams, 2022. "The impact of high speed quoting on execution risk dynamics: Evidence from interest rate futures markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(8), pages 1434-1465, August.
    9. Kondor, Péter & Zawadowski, Adam, 2019. "Learning in crowded markets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    10. Khapko, Mariana & Zoican, Marius, 2021. "Do speed bumps curb low-latency investment? Evidence from a laboratory market," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    11. Matthew F Dixon, 2017. "A High Frequency Trade Execution Model for Supervised Learning," Papers 1710.03870, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2017.
    12. Gunther Capelle-Blancard, 2018. "What is the Point of (the Hundreds of Thousands of Billions of) Stock Transactions?," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 60(1), pages 15-33, March.
    13. Thomas Kuppelwieser & David Wozabal, 2023. "Intraday power trading: toward an arms race in weather forecasting?," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 45(1), pages 57-83, March.
    14. Hagströmer, Björn, 2021. "Bias in the effective bid-ask spread," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 314-337.
    15. Hautsch, Nikolaus & Scheuch, Christoph & Voigt, Stefan, 2018. "Limits to arbitrage in markets with stochastic settlement latency," CFS Working Paper Series 616, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    16. Jørgensen, Kjell & Skjeltorp, Johannes & Ødegaard, Bernt Arne, 2018. "Throttling hyperactive robots – Order-to-trade ratios at the Oslo Stock Exchange," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-16.
    17. Conrad, Jennifer & Wahal, Sunil, 2020. "The term structure of liquidity provision," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 239-259.
    18. Bartlett, Robert P. & McCrary, Justin, 2019. "How rigged are stock markets? Evidence from microsecond timestamps," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 37-60.
    19. Brolley, Michael & Cimon, David A., 2020. "Order-Flow Segmentation, Liquidity, and Price Discovery: The Role of Latency Delays," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(8), pages 2555-2587, December.
    20. Zhou, Hao & Kalev, Petko S., 2019. "Algorithmic and high frequency trading in Asia-Pacific, now and the future," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 186-207.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03247287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.