IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v55y2020i8p2555-2587_5.html

Order-Flow Segmentation, Liquidity, and Price Discovery: The Role of Latency Delays

Author

Listed:
  • Brolley, Michael
  • Cimon, David A.

Abstract

Latency delays intentionally slow order execution at an exchange, often to protect market makers against latency arbitrage. We study informed trading in a fragmented market in which one exchange introduces a latency delay on market orders. Liquidity improves at the delayed exchange as informed investors emigrate to the conventional exchange, where liquidity worsens. In aggregate, implementing a latency delay worsens total expected welfare. We find that the impact on price discovery depends on the relative abundance of speculators. If the exchange with delay technology competes against a conventional exchange, it implements a delay only if it has sufficiently low market share.

Suggested Citation

  • Brolley, Michael & Cimon, David A., 2020. "Order-Flow Segmentation, Liquidity, and Price Discovery: The Role of Latency Delays," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(8), pages 2555-2587, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:55:y:2020:i:8:p:2555-2587_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002210901900067X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alfred Lehar & Christine Parlour & Marius Zoican, 2023. "Fragmentation and optimal liquidity supply on decentralized exchanges," Papers 2307.13772, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    2. Mark Marner-Hausen, 2022. "Developing a Framework for Real-Time Trading in a Laboratory Financial Market," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 172, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    3. Brolley, Michael & Zoican, Marius, 2023. "Liquid speed: A micro-burst fee for low-latency exchanges," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Khapko, Mariana & Zoican, Marius, 2021. "Do speed bumps curb low-latency investment? Evidence from a laboratory market," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    5. Eric M. Aldrich & Daniel Friedman, 2023. "Order Protection Through Delayed Messaging," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 774-790, February.
    6. Vasilios Mavroudis & Hayden Melton, 2019. "Libra: Fair Order-Matching for Electronic Financial Exchanges," Papers 1910.00321, arXiv.org.
    7. Le Moign, Caroline, 2025. "Securing passive liquidity: The impact of Europe’s first asymmetric speed bump on market liquidity," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Papavassiliou, Vassilios G. & Kinateder, Harald, 2021. "Information shares and market quality before and during the European sovereign debt crisis," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Michael Brolley & Marius Zoican, 2019. "Liquid Speed: On-Demand Fast Trading at Distributed Exchanges," Papers 1907.10720, arXiv.org.
    10. Morris, Jeremy & Xu, Ke, 2025. "The effect of NYSE American’s latency delay on informed trading," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    11. Anderson, Lisa & Andrews, Emad & Devani, Baiju & Mueller, Michael & Walton, Adrian, 2022. "Speed segmentation on exchanges: Competition for slow flow," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    12. Markus Baldauf & Joshua Mollner, 2020. "High‐Frequency Trading and Market Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(3), pages 1495-1526, June.
    13. Haas, Marlene & Khapko, Mariana & Zoican, Marius, 2021. "Speed and learning in high-frequency auctions," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    14. Xu, Ke, 2023. "High frequency market making during stressed periods," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 379-397.
    15. Irtisam, Rasheek & Sokolov, Konstantin, 2023. "Do stock exchanges specialize? Evidence from the New Jersey transaction tax proposal," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    16. Yannick Limmer & Thilo Meyer-Brandis, 2021. "Large Platonic Markets with Delays," Papers 2110.13678, arXiv.org.
    17. Jun Aoyagi, 2019. "Strategic Speed Choice by High-Frequency Traders under Speed Bumps," ISER Discussion Paper 1050, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    18. Suchismita Mishra & Le Zhao, 2021. "Order Routing Decisions for a Fragmented Market: A Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-32, November.
    19. Floris Laly & Mikael Petitjean, 2020. "Mini flash crashes: Review, taxonomy and policy responses," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 251-271, July.
    20. Mariana Khapko & Marius Zoican, 2019. "Do speed bumps curb low-latency trading? Evidence from a laboratory market," Papers 1910.03068, arXiv.org.
    21. Tomy Lee, 2019. "Latency in Fragmented Markets," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 33, pages 128-153, July.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G - Financial Economics
    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:55:y:2020:i:8:p:2555-2587_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.