IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00263950.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mondialisation, Organisation mondiale du commerce et rapports Nord-Sud : entre différenciation et espace politique pour le développement

Author

Listed:
  • Mehdi Abbas

    (LEPII - Laboratoire d'Economie de la Production et de l'Intégration Internationale - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Dans le cadre des négociations au sein de l'OMC, le dossier TSD (traitement spécial et différencié), se trouve à la croisée des chemins : avancera-t-il sur la voie de la différenciation entre pays, ou bien sur la voie de la reconnaissance d'un espace politique pour le développement ? Dans un premier temps, il convient de présenter les principales caractéristiques du TSD dans le régime de l'OMC. En effet, les débats actuels ne sont compréhensibles qu'à l'aune des asymétries institutionnelles et structurelles contenues dans les accords commerciaux multilatéraux. Une fois ces éléments traités, cette contribution abordera les termes du nouveau compromis Nord-Sud négocié à l'OMC. En l'état actuel de la négociation, deux thèses s'opposent : celle d'une plus grande différenciation entre pays du Sud et celle d'une reconnaissance d'un espace politique pour le développement. Une convergence des positions vers une synthèse de ces deux thèses est la proposition sur laquelle cette contribution se conclut.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehdi Abbas, 2007. "Mondialisation, Organisation mondiale du commerce et rapports Nord-Sud : entre différenciation et espace politique pour le développement," Post-Print halshs-00263950, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00263950
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00263950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00263950/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keck, Alexander & Low, Patrick, 2004. "Special and differential treatment in the WTO: Why, when and how?," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2004-03, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    2. Robert E. Baldwin, 2004. "Openness and Growth: What's the Empirical Relationship?," NBER Chapters, in: Challenges to Globalization: Analyzing the Economics, pages 499-521, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. John Whalley, 1999. "Special and Differential Treatment in the Millennium Round," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(8), pages 1065-1093, November.
    4. Robert Hamwey, 2005. "Expanding national policy space for development: Why the Multilateral Trading System must change," Development and Comp Systems 0511005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. GAOMBALET, Célestin Guy-Serge, 2021. "La Zlecaf à l’épreuve des déterminants et stratégies d’internationalisation des firmes multinationales ainsi que du régime du multilatéralisme commercial de l’OMC [The AfCFTA tests the internationa," MPRA Paper 109001, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehdi Abbas, 2008. "Les rapports Nord-Sud à l'OMC. Entre différenciation et espace politique pour le développement," Post-Print halshs-00217467, HAL.
    2. Holmes, Peter & Lopez-Gonzalez, Javier, 2011. "Towards a New Age in Special and Differential Treatment," Papers 239, World Trade Institute.
    3. Mehdi Abbas, 2009. "Mondialisation et développement. Que nous enseigne l'enlisement des négociations commerciales de l'OMC ?," Post-Print halshs-00443793, HAL.
    4. Omphemetse S. Sibanda Sr., 2015. "Towards a Revised GATT/WTO Special and Differential Treatment Regime for Least Developed and Developing Countries," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 50(1), pages 31-40, February.
    5. Kym Anderson, 2005. "On the Virtues of Multilateral Trade Negotiations," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 81(255), pages 414-438, December.
    6. Salvador Gil-Pareja & Rafael Llorca-Vivero & José Antonio Martínez-Serrano, 2018. "Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: which have been best to promote exports?," Working Papers 1802, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.
    7. Holmes, Peter & Lopez-Gonzalez, Javier & MILE 02, Anirudh Shingal, 2011. "TRIPS and Special & Differential Treatment – Revisiting the Case for Derogations in Applying Patent Protection for Pharmaceuticals in Developing Count," Papers 238, World Trade Institute.
    8. Dodzin, Sergei & Vamvakidis, Athanasios, 2004. "Trade and industrialization in developing economies," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 319-328, October.
    9. Angela Cheptea & Guillaume Gaulier & Soledad Zignago, 2004. "The World Market: Market Shares and Export Performances," La Lettre du CEPII, CEPII research center, issue 231.
    10. He, Weijun & Wang, Bo & Danish, & Wang, Zhaohua, 2018. "Will regional economic integration influence carbon dioxide marginal abatement costs? Evidence from Chinese panel data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 263-274.
    11. Kose, M. Ayhan & Prasad, Eswar S. & Terrones, Marco E., 2006. "How do trade and financial integration affect the relationship between growth and volatility?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 176-202, June.
    12. Buch, Claudia M. & Toubal, Farid, 2009. "Openness and growth: The long shadow of the Berlin Wall," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 409-422, September.
    13. Claudia Buch & Paola Monti, 2010. "Openness and income disparities: does trade explain the “Mezzogiorno effect”?," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(4), pages 667-688, January.
    14. Dong, Baomin & Gu, Xinhua & Song, Huasheng, 2017. "Capital market liberalization: Optimal tradeoff and bargaining delay," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 78-88.
    15. M. Ayhan Kose & Guy M. Meredith & Christopher M. Towe, 2005. "How Has NAFTA Affected the Mexican Economy? Review and Evidence," Springer Books, in: Rolf J. Langhammer & Lúcio Vinhas Souza (ed.), Monetary Policy and Macroeconomic Stabilization in Latin America, pages 35-81, Springer.
    16. Rabah Arezki & Alou Adesse Dama & Grégoire Rota-Graziosi, 2021. "Working Paper 349 - Revisiting the Relationship between Trade Liberalization and Taxation," Working Paper Series 2475, African Development Bank.
    17. Samuel K. Gayi, 2006. "Does the WTO Agreement on Agriculture Endanger Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa?," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-60, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Ricardo E. Buitrago R., 2009. "Reformas comerciales (apertura) en América latina: revisando sus impactos en el crecimiento y el desarrollo," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, December.
    19. Mr. Stephen Tokarick & Mr. James H Cassing, 2005. "Trade and Growth in the Presence of Distortions," IMF Working Papers 2005/012, International Monetary Fund.
    20. Rao, B. Bhaskara & Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya, 2011. "Globalization and growth in the low income African countries with the extreme bounds analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 795-805, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00263950. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.