IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05391551.html

Field experiments: Overcoming the limitations of survey experiments for actionable behavioural insights

Author

Listed:
  • S. Dolnicar
  • G. Viglia

  • F. Kurtaliqi

    (Audencia Business School)

Abstract

Historically, one-off cross-sectional survey studies have dominated empirical research in tourism and hospitality. The inability to draw causal conclusions from such data has led to an increased uptake of survey experiments, which are easy and affordable to conduct and can identify causal relationships between constructs under controlled conditions. Survey experiments, however, have a severe limitation: they do not provide insights into real behaviour, restricting researchers' ability to generate actionable insights and reliable practical recommendations. This article offers a systematic comparison of three approaches (one-off cross-sectional survey studies, survey experiments, and field experiments) and provides step-by-step guidance on the design and implementation of field experiments and quasi-experimental field studies.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Dolnicar & G. Viglia & F. Kurtaliqi, 2026. "Field experiments: Overcoming the limitations of survey experiments for actionable behavioural insights," Post-Print hal-05391551, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05391551
    DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2025.104080
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05391551v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05391551v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.annals.2025.104080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05391551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.