IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05340815.html

Like Parent, Like Subsidiary? On the Diffusion of Sustainability Reporting in Multinational Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelaziz Fourati

    (SMU - South Mediterranean University Group)

  • Amel Zenaidi
  • Maher Jeriji

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research investigates the determinants of sustainability reporting practices within multinational companies (MNCs) and their subsidiaries, focusing on the mediating role of MNC parents and the moderating impact of cultural distance and local isomorphism. We conducted a content analysis of the stand‐alone sustainability reports of 187 MNCs and 332 subsidiaries over a decade (2011–2020), comparing 1594 subsidiary reports with 983 parent reports. A path analysis approach assessed the mediating role of MNC parents, while random effects panel models assessed the moderating effects of local isomorphism and cultural distance. The results indicate that MNC parents positively and significantly influence the adoption of sustainability reporting practices by their subsidiaries. However, the successful implementation of these practices is moderated by local institutional context and cultural distance. Subsidiary transparency was positively influenced by industry characteristics and effective local governance, while financial constraints and the degree of alignment with international standards played a complex role in reporting practices. Our research indicates that MNCs need to adjust their global approaches to fit into local environments and improve the transparency of subsidiaries by utilizing industry‐specific tactics and robust local management. Policymakers need to prioritize enhancing local governance structures to improve sustainability reporting. This research contributes to the field of institutional theory by demonstrating how local isomorphism affects the dissemination of reporting practices within MNCs. Furthermore, it is one of the few recent studies to examine sustainability reports in‐depth, analyzing their content and assessing the extent to which cultural distance affects the adoption of transparency practices global.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelaziz Fourati & Amel Zenaidi & Maher Jeriji, 2025. "Like Parent, Like Subsidiary? On the Diffusion of Sustainability Reporting in Multinational Companies," Post-Print hal-05340815, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05340815
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.3100
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05340815v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05340815v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.3100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bryan W Husted & Ivan Montiel & Petra Christmann, 2016. "Effects of local legitimacy on certification decisions to global and national CSR standards by multinational subsidiaries and domestic firms," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 47(3), pages 382-397, April.
    2. Isabelle Maignan & David A Ralston, 2002. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from Businesses' Self-presentations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 33(3), pages 497-514, September.
    3. Lin Zheng & Nauzer Balsara & Haiyu Huang, 2014. "Regulatory pressure, blockholders and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures in China," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(2), pages 226-245, May.
    4. Charl de Villiers & Ana Marques, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility, country-level predispositions, and the consequences of choosing a level of disclosure," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 167-195, February.
    5. Christopher Marquis & Michael W. Toffel & Yanhua Zhou, 2016. "Scrutiny, Norms, and Selective Disclosure: A Global Study of Greenwashing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 483-504, April.
    6. Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2012. "What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 43(9), pages 834-864, December.
    7. Shin, Jiyoung & Moon, Jon Jungbien & Kang, Jingoo, 2023. "Where does ESG pay? The role of national culture in moderating the relationship between ESG performance and financial performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3).
    8. Miska, Christof & Witt, Michael A. & Stahl, Günter K., 2016. "Drivers of Global CSR Integration and Local CSR Responsiveness: Evidence from Chinese MNEs," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(3), pages 317-345, July.
    9. Krista Bondy & Jeremy Moon & Dirk Matten, 2012. "An Institution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Multi-National Corporations (MNCs): Form and Implications," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 281-299, December.
    10. Yungwook Kim & Soo-Yeon Kim, 2010. "The Influence of Cultural Values on Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Application of Hofstede’s Dimensions to Korean Public Relations Practitioners," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(4), pages 485-500, February.
    11. Thomas Thijssens & Laury Bollen & Harold Hassink, 2015. "Secondary Stakeholder Influence on CSR Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Salience Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(4), pages 873-891, December.
    12. Md Moazzem Hossain & Manzurul Alam & Angela Hecimovic & Mohammad Alamgir Hossain & Aklema Choudhury Lema, 2016. "Contributing barriers to corporate social and environmental responsibility practices in a developing country," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(2), pages 319-346, May.
    13. Crespo, Cátia Fernandes & Lages, Luis Filipe & Crespo, Nuno Fernandes, 2020. "Improving subsidiaries' innovation through knowledge inflows from headquarters and peer subsidiaries," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(4).
    14. Won‐Moo Hur & Yeonshin Kim, 2017. "How Does Culture Improve Consumer Engagement in CSR Initiatives? the Mediating Role of Motivational Attributions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(6), pages 620-633, November.
    15. Inya Egbe & Emmanuel Adegbite & Kemi C. Yekini, 2018. "The influence of multinational enterprises on subsidiaries: context matters," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(2), pages 703-724, February.
    16. Sarianna M. Lundan & Jiatao Li, 2019. "Adjusting to and learning from institutional diversity: Toward a capability-building perspective," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(1), pages 36-47, February.
    17. Lori Holder-Webb & Jeffrey Cohen & Leda Nath & David Wood, 2009. "The Supply of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures Among U.S. Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 497-527, February.
    18. Palitha Konara & Alexander Mohr, 2019. "Why We Should Stop Using the Kogut and Singh Index," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 335-354, June.
    19. Dima Jamali & Ben Neville, 2011. "Convergence Versus Divergence of CSR in Developing Countries: An Embedded Multi-Layered Institutional Lens," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(4), pages 599-621, September.
    20. Luis Escobar & Harrie Vredenburg, 2011. "Multinational Oil Companies and the Adoption of Sustainable Development: A Resource-Based and Institutional Theory Interpretation of Adoption Heterogeneity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 39-65, January.
    21. Lin Zheng & Nauzer Balsara & Haiyu Huang, 2014. "Regulatory pressure, blockholders and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures in China," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(2), pages 226-245, May.
    22. Muatasim Ismaeel & Zarina Zakaria, 2019. "Perception of preparers of sustainability reports in the Middle East," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(1), pages 89-116, August.
    23. Thanh Hung Nguyen & Quang Trong Vu & Duc Minh Nguyen & Hoang Long Le, 2021. "Factors Influencing Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Its Impact on Financial Performance: The Case of Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    24. Md Moazzem Hossain & Manzurul Alam & Angela Hecimovic & Mohammad Alamgir Hossain & Aklema Choudhury Lema, 2016. "Contributing barriers to corporate social and environmental responsibility practices in a developing country," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(2), pages 319-346, May.
    25. Mohammad Enamul Hoque, 2017. "Why Company Should Adopt Integrated Reporting?," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 241-248.
    26. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-06-2016-2608 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roger Leonard Burritt & Katherine Leanne Christ & Hussain Gulzar Rammal & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "Multinational Enterprise Strategies for Addressing Sustainability: the Need for Consolidation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 389-410, June.
    2. Leonidas C. Leonidou & Svetla T. Marinova & Marin A. Marinov & Jonas S. Eduardsen & Pantelitsa P. Eteokleous, 2024. "An Enquiry into MNEs’ CSR Practices: Literature Assessment, Managerial Implications, and Academic Perspectives," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 64(5), pages 759-809, October.
    3. Rong Ma & Rakesh B. Sambharya, 2024. "International diversification and corporate social responsibility disclosure quality: Employee versus environmental dimensions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4248-4264, September.
    4. Figueira, Sandra & Gauthier, Caroline & Torres de Oliveira, Rui, 2023. "CSR and stakeholder salience in MNE subsidiaries in emerging markets," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5).
    5. Francisco Javier Forcadell & Antonio Lorena & Elisa Aracil, 2023. "The firm under the spotlight: How stakeholder scrutiny shapes corporate social responsibility and its influence on performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1258-1272, May.
    6. Pisani, Niccolò & Kourula, Arno & Kolk, Ans & Meijer, Renske, 2017. "How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 591-614.
    7. Ranjan DasGupta & Arup Roy, 2025. "Performance shortfall condition and environmental, social, governance performance: Does economic policy uncertainty and national culture matter?," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 81-132, March.
    8. José María Agudo-Valiente & Concepción Garcés-Ayerbe & Manuel Salvador-Figueras, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility Drivers and Barriers According to Managers’ Perception; Evidence from Spanish Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Corrigan, Caitlin C., 2018. "Corporate social responsibility and local context: The case of mining in Southern Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 233-243.
    10. Peter Tashman & Valentina Marano & Tatiana Kostova, 2019. "Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(2), pages 153-171, March.
    11. Carmelo Reverte, 2022. "The importance of institutional differences among countries in SDGs achievement: A cross‐country empirical study," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1882-1899, December.
    12. Liu, Huan & Hou, Canran, 2023. "The impact of institutional investors' corporate site visits on corporate social responsibility," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    13. Doś Anna, 2017. "The Effect of Foreign Equity Ownership on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Poland," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 13(3), pages 66-75, September.
    14. Martinez Meyers, Susana & Ferrero-Ferrero, Idoya & Muñoz-Torres, María Jesus, 2024. "ARE sustainable funds doing the talk and the walk? An ESG score analysis of fund portfolio holdings," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 1526-1541.
    15. Adewole Olukorede, 2025. "Stakeholder engagement and participation in environmental contexts, social responsibility and society based on a study conducted in Rome, Italy," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-45, December.
    16. Simone Terzani & Teresa Turzo, 2021. "Religious social norms and corporate sustainability: The effect of religiosity on environmental, social, and governance disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 485-496, January.
    17. Kamini Gupta & Donal Crilly & Thomas Greckhamer, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1869-1900, October.
    18. Zhonghua Zhao & Fanchen Meng & Yin He & Zhouyang Gu, 2019. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Competitive Advantage with Multiple Mediations from Social Capital and Dynamic Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Bu, Maoliang & Xu, Liang & Tang, Ryan W., 2023. "MNEs’ transfer of socially irresponsible practices: A replication with new extensions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(2).
    20. Joel Bothello & Ioannis Ioannou & Vlad‐Andrei Porumb & Yasemin Zengin‐Karaibrahimoglu, 2023. "CSR decoupling within business groups and the risk of perceived greenwashing," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(13), pages 3217-3251, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05340815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.