IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05242650.html

Interactions entre Grandes Entreprises et Startups deeptech via un incubateur corporate

Author

Listed:
  • Bénédicte Aldebert

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon)

  • Rani Jeanne Dang

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur)

  • Amandine Maus

    (AMU - Aix Marseille Université, CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon)

Abstract

On parle souvent de David contre Goliath lorsque l'on fait référence aux relations qu'entretiennent les startup et les grands entreprises (GE). Pourtant David et Goliath trouvent des avantages mutuels à travailler ensemble à en croire la progression continue des alliances startup-GE, 87% en 2019 contre 79% en 2017 (selon RAISE et Bain & Company, 2019). La capacité d'innovation des startups, couplée à leur rapidité d'exécution se révèlent en effet être des atouts de taille pour les grandes entreprises tandis que les grandes entreprises apportent des soutiens financiers, matériel et de notoriété pour la startup. Les intérêts stratégiques, technologiques et économiques en termes d'innovation ont été assez largement étudiés dans la littérature mais les mécanismes de transfert de légitimité de l'un à l'autre beaucoup moins. Notre recherche vise précisément à contribuer à la compréhension des relations entre startup deeptech et grandes entreprises sous l'angle de la légitimité. Nous nous intéresserons à des startups particulières, les deeptech, considérées comme garantes de l'avenir et du rayonnement de la performance économique française. Deux études longitudinales portant attention aux mécanismes de légitimité, l'une de la startup et l'autre de la grande entreprise seront réalisées pour les comparer. Une contribution de ce travail est d'apporter le cadre théorique de la légitimité à une compréhension plus approfondie du management de l'innovation dans la relation startup-GG.

Suggested Citation

  • Bénédicte Aldebert & Rani Jeanne Dang & Amandine Maus, 2025. "Interactions entre Grandes Entreprises et Startups deeptech via un incubateur corporate," Post-Print hal-05242650, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05242650
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05242650v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05242650v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karim Messeghem & Chaffik Bakkali & Sylvie Sammut & Abdelaziz Swalhi, 2018. "Measuring Nonprofit Incubator Performance: Toward an Adapted Balanced Scorecard Approach," Post-Print halshs-01948730, HAL.
    2. Delmar, Frederic & Shane, Scott, 2004. "Legitimating first: organizing activities and the survival of new ventures," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 385-410, May.
    3. Alfred D. Chandler, 1992. "Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 79-100, Summer.
    4. Karim Messeghem & Sylvie Sammut & René Pierre Beylier, 2014. "New venture legitimacy and entrepreneurial support," Post-Print hal-02048410, HAL.
    5. Karim Messeghem & Sylvie Sammut & René-Pierre Beylier, 2014. "New Venture Legitimacy and Entrepreneurial Support," Post-Print hal-02094080, HAL.
    6. Karim Messeghem & Sylvie Sammut & René Pierre Beylier, 2014. "New venture legitimacy and entrepreneurial support," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(4), pages 528-551.
    7. Karim Messeghem & Chaffik Bakkali & Sylvie Sammut & Abdelaziz Swalhi, 2018. "Measuring Nonprofit Incubator Performance: Toward an Adapted Balanced Scorecard Approach," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 658-680, October.
    8. Klaus Weber & M. Tina Dacin, 2011. "The Cultural Construction of Organizational Life: Introduction to the Special Issue," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 287-298, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amandine Maus, 2022. "Construire et transmettre de la légitimité. Le cas de deux programmes d'accompagnement de l'économie sociale et solidaire," Post-Print hal-03864847, HAL.
    2. Florian Überbacher, 2014. "Legitimation of New Ventures: A Review and Research Programme," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 667-698, June.
    3. Fisher, Greg & Kuratko, Donald F. & Bloodgood, James M. & Hornsby, Jeffrey S., 2017. "Legitimate to whom? The challenge of audience diversity and new venture legitimacy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 52-71.
    4. Atul Kumar & Vinaydeep Brar & Chetan Chaudhari & Shirish S. Raibagkar, 2023. "Performance Management Through the Balanced Scorecard Approach by the South African Revenue Service," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1143-1165, September.
    5. Sohail, Kanza & Belitski, Maksim & Castro Christiansen, Liza, 2023. "Developing business incubation process frameworks: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    6. Amandine Maus, 2024. "Finding My Place In The Collective: How The Individual Level Contributes To The Incubator'S Legitimation Process," Post-Print hal-04649151, HAL.
    7. Tietschert, Maike & Bahadurzada, Hassina & Kerrissey, Michaela, 2024. "Revisiting organizational culture in healthcare: Heterogeneity as a resource," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    8. Gloria Leonor Ortiz Morales & Juan Carlos Ramos Aguilar & Katherin Yineth Lozada Morales, 2022. "Culture as an obstacle for entrepreneurship," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Murphy Patrick J. & Pollack Jeff & Nagy Brian & Rutherford Matthew & Coombes Susan, 2019. "Risk Tolerance, Legitimacy, and Perspective: Navigating Biases in Social Enterprise Evaluations," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Saerom (Ronnie) Lee & J. Daniel Kim, 2024. "When do startups scale? Large‐scale evidence from job postings," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(9), pages 1633-1669, September.
    11. Diana Hechavarría & Charles Matthews & Paul Reynolds, 2016. "Does start-up financing influence start-up speed? Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 137-167, January.
    12. Erik Stam & Roy Thurik & Peter van der Zwan, 2010. "Entrepreneurial exit in real and imagined markets," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 19(4), pages 1109-1139, August.
    13. Gamal Atallah, 2002. "Production Technology, Information Technology, and Vertical Integration Under Asymmetric Information," Working Papers 0203EClassification-JEL: , University of Ottawa, Department of Economics.
    14. Zhang, Hongjuan & Young, Michael N. & Tan, Justin & Sun, Weizheng, 2018. "How Chinese companies deal with a legitimacy imbalance when acquiring firms from developed economies," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 752-767.
    15. Kim, Sukkoo, 1999. "The Rise of Multiunit Firms in U.S. Manufacturing," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 360-386, October.
    16. Daniela P. Blettner & Zi-Lin He & Songcui Hu & Richard A. Bettis, 2015. "Adaptive aspirations and performance heterogeneity: Attention allocation among multiple reference points," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(7), pages 987-1005, July.
    17. Jackie Krafft, 2006. "Business history and the organization of industry," Post-Print hal-00211780, HAL.
    18. Christina Theodoraki & Alexis Catanzaro, 2022. "Widening the borders of entrepreneurial ecosystem through the international lens," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 383-406, April.
    19. Jean-Luc Gaffard, 2003. "Coordination, marché et organisation. Essai sur l'efficacité et la stabilité des économies de marché," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 85(2), pages 235-270.
    20. Klaus Rathe & Ulrich Witt, 2001. "The Nature of the Firm – Static versus Developmental Interpretations," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 5(3), pages 331-351, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05242650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.