IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03864847.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Construire et transmettre de la légitimité. Le cas de deux programmes d'accompagnement de l'économie sociale et solidaire

Author

Listed:
  • Amandine Maus

    (AMU - Aix Marseille Université, CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon)

Abstract

Dans une société qui prône l'entrepreneuriat comme un choix de carrière envisageable et valorisé, les incubateurs, structures d'accompagnement entrepreneurial, constituent un enjeu politique et financier majeur pour les États. Ces organisations sont cependant critiquées, particulièrement en France, pour leur nombre trop important ou leur supposée faible efficacité. La question de la légitimité des incubateurs se pose alors, notamment pour déterminer lesquels sont les plus pertinents pour accompagner les entrepreneurs et pour percevoir des fonds publics et privés. Dans ce contexte, cette communication porte sur ce sujet de la légitimité dans le contexte de l'accompagnement entrepreneurial. Nous mobilisons les travaux qui portent sur les mécanismes de légitimation des organisations pour étudier les incubateurs et leurs processus de construction de légitimité. Pour appréhender ces processus, une étude de cas unique et longitudinale est en cours de réalisation depuis février 2021. Le cas étudié est un incubateur français spécialiste de l'accompagnement de projets entrepreneuriaux issus de l'Economie Sociale et Solidaire. La construction de la légitimité de deux programmes d'accompagnement qui se sont succédé y est étudiée. Les données qui permettent d'étudier le premier programme ont été collectées a posteriori, quand les données focalisées sur le second programme sont collectées en temps réel. Les premiers résultats de cette recherche soulignent la présence de mécanismes de légitimation qui s'échelonnent dans le temps en fonction de leur nature, ainsi que des phases d'abandon du développement de la légitimité au profit d'un recentrage sur les acquis du programme. Les mécanismes de légitimation identitaires, associatifs et organisationnels évoqués par la littérature sont mobilisés par la structure d'accompagnement pour construire la légitimité de ses programmes. Notre contribution est alors de mettre en avant l'articulation et la temporalité de ces mécanismes, de même des phases d'absence de mobilisation de ces mécanismes, remplacés par le maintien ou la transmission de légitimité.

Suggested Citation

  • Amandine Maus, 2022. "Construire et transmettre de la légitimité. Le cas de deux programmes d'accompagnement de l'économie sociale et solidaire," Post-Print hal-03864847, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03864847
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03864847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03864847/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amezcua, Alejandro & Ratinho, Tiago & Plummer, Lawrence A. & Jayamohan, Parvathi, 2020. "Organizational sponsorship and the economics of place: How regional urbanization and localization shape incubator outcomes," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(4).
    2. Sarfraz Mian & Wadid Lamine & Alain Fayolle, 2016. "Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge," Post-Print hal-02014389, HAL.
    3. Karim Messeghem & Chaffik Bakkali & Sylvie Sammut & Abdelaziz Swalhi, 2018. "Measuring Nonprofit Incubator Performance: Toward an Adapted Balanced Scorecard Approach," Post-Print halshs-01948730, HAL.
    4. Fisher, Greg & Kuratko, Donald F. & Bloodgood, James M. & Hornsby, Jeffrey S., 2017. "Legitimate to whom? The challenge of audience diversity and new venture legitimacy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 52-71.
    5. Delmar, Frederic & Shane, Scott, 2004. "Legitimating first: organizing activities and the survival of new ventures," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 385-410, May.
    6. Fernanda Arreola & Véronique Favre-Bonte & Sébastien Tran, 2021. "The Corporate Accelerator: A New Kind of Strategic Factor Market to Access Strategic Resources," Post-Print hal-03594216, HAL.
    7. Cohen, Susan & Fehder, Daniel C. & Hochberg, Yael V. & Murray, Fiona, 2019. "The design of startup accelerators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7), pages 1781-1797.
    8. Sarfraz Mian & Wadid Lamine & Alain Fayolle, 2016. "Technology Business Incubation : An overview of the state of knowledge," Post-Print hal-02313371, HAL.
    9. Karim Messeghem & Sylvie Sammut & René Pierre Beylier, 2014. "New venture legitimacy and entrepreneurial support," Post-Print hal-02048410, HAL.
    10. Karim Messeghem & Sylvie Sammut & René-Pierre Beylier, 2014. "New Venture Legitimacy and Entrepreneurial Support," Post-Print hal-02094080, HAL.
    11. Karim Messeghem & Sylvie Sammut & René Pierre Beylier, 2014. "New venture legitimacy and entrepreneurial support," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(4), pages 528-551.
    12. Karim Messeghem & Chaffik Bakkali & Sylvie Sammut & Abdelaziz Swalhi, 2018. "Measuring Nonprofit Incubator Performance: Toward an Adapted Balanced Scorecard Approach," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 658-680, October.
    13. Rudy Aernoudt, 2004. "Incubators: Tool for Entrepreneurship?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 127-135, September.
    14. Mian, Sarfraz & Lamine, Wadid & Fayolle, Alain, 2016. "Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 50, pages 1-12.
    15. Sean M. Hackett & David M. Dilts, 2004. "A Real Options-Driven Theory of Business Incubation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 41-54, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian J. Bergman & Jeffery S. McMullen, 2022. "Helping Entrepreneurs Help Themselves: A Review and Relational Research Agenda on Entrepreneurial Support Organizations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 688-728, May.
    2. Sansone, Giuliano & Andreotti, Pietro & Colombelli, Alessandra & Landoni, Paolo, 2020. "Are social incubators different from other incubators? Evidence from Italy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Amandine Maus & Sylvie Sammut, 2018. "Business model innovation in incubators: the role played by dynamic capabilities theory," Post-Print hal-02466175, HAL.
    4. Lindelöf, Peter & Hellberg, Roland, 2023. "Incubation - An evolutionary process," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    5. Li Xiao & David North, 2017. "The graduation performance of technology business incubators in China’s three tier cities: the role of incubator funding, technical support, and entrepreneurial mentoring," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 615-634, June.
    6. Charlene L. Nicholls-Nixon & Dave Valliere & Steven A. Gedeon & Sean Wise, 2021. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the lifecycle of university business incubators: An integrative case study," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 809-837, June.
    7. Domicián Máté & Ni Made Estiyanti & Adam Novotny, 2024. "How to support innovative small firms? Bibliometric analysis and visualization of start-up incubation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Heiko Butz & Matthias Jan Mrożewski, 2021. "The Selection Process and Criteria of Impact Accelerators. An Exploratory Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Han, Shaojie & Su, Jingqin & Lyu, Yibo & Liu, Qing, 2022. "How do business incubators govern incubation relationships with different new ventures?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    10. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Sheila Walsh & Cuiwen Li & Angathevar Baskaran, 2021. "Exploring technology business incubators and their business incubation models: case studies from China," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 90-116, February.
    11. Vidit Mohan & Rohan Chinchwadkar, 2022. "Technology Business Incubation: A Literature Review and Gaps," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 53-63, June.
    12. Kuebart, Andreas, 2022. "Open creative labs as functional infrastructure for entrepreneurial ecosystems: Using sequence analysis to explore tempo-spatial trajectories of startups in Berlin," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    13. J. Piet Hausberg & Sabrina Korreck, 2020. "Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 151-176, February.
    14. Margarida Madaleno & Max Nathan & Henry Overman & Sevrin Waights, 2022. "Incubators, accelerators and urban economic development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(2), pages 281-300, February.
    15. van Rijnsoever, Frank J. & Eveleens, Chris P., 2021. "Money Don't matter? How incubation experience affects start-up entrepreneurs' resource valuation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    16. Sharma, Supriya & Vohra, Neharika, 2020. "Incubation in India – A Multilevel Analysis," IIMA Working Papers WP 2020-03-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    17. Liu, Yipeng, 2020. "The micro-foundations of global business incubation: Stakeholder engagement and strategic entrepreneurial partnerships," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Panagiotis Tsolakidis & Naoum Mylonas & Eugenia Petridou, 2020. "The Impact of Imitation Strategies, Managerial and Entrepreneurial Skills on Startups’ Entrepreneurial Innovation," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Isabel Diez-Vial & Angeles Montoro-Sanchez, 2017. "Research evolution in science parks and incubators: foundations and new trends," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(3), pages 1243-1272, March.
    20. Surana, Kavita & Singh, Anuraag & Sagar, Ambuj D, 2020. "Strengthening science, technology, and innovation-based incubators to help achieve Sustainable Development Goals: Lessons from India," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03864847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.