IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/porgrv/v23y2023i3d10.1007_s11115-022-00646-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Management Through the Balanced Scorecard Approach by the South African Revenue Service

Author

Listed:
  • Atul Kumar

    (Dr. D. Y. Patil B-School)

  • Vinaydeep Brar

    (S.N.G. Institute of Management & Research)

  • Chetan Chaudhari

    (Global Business School and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth,)

  • Shirish S. Raibagkar

    (Institute of Cost Accountants of India)

Abstract

This paper, presents the case of the South African Revenue Service (SARS), whose strategic planning reflects features of the balanced scorecard (BSC) approach. The strategic plan documents of the SARS were examined. Applying manifest and latent content analysis it is highlighted how the mission, vision, and strategy have been translated into objectives that have key performance indicators, targets, and initiatives. Some of its recent performance achievements are proof of the potential that a tool like BSC holds. The SARS strategic plan is a motivating case and a learning input for government organizations dealing with the intricacies of the BSC systematically. Other revenue collecting and government agencies can consider adopting of a similar approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Atul Kumar & Vinaydeep Brar & Chetan Chaudhari & Shirish S. Raibagkar, 2023. "Performance Management Through the Balanced Scorecard Approach by the South African Revenue Service," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1143-1165, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:23:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11115-022-00646-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11115-022-00646-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11115-022-00646-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11115-022-00646-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mik Wisniewski & Snjólfur Ólafsson, 2004. "Developing balanced scorecards in local authorities: a comparison of experience," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 53(7), pages 602-610, October.
    2. Karim Messeghem & Chaffik Bakkali & Sylvie Sammut & Abdelaziz Swalhi, 2018. "Measuring Nonprofit Incubator Performance: Toward an Adapted Balanced Scorecard Approach," Post-Print halshs-01948730, HAL.
    3. Dorothea Greiling, 2010. "Balanced scorecard implementation in German non‐profit organisations," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 534-554, July.
    4. Karim Messeghem & Chaffik Bakkali & Sylvie Sammut & Abdelaziz Swalhi, 2018. "Measuring Nonprofit Incubator Performance: Toward an Adapted Balanced Scorecard Approach," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 658-680, October.
    5. Dorothea Greiling, 2010. "Balanced scorecard implementation in German non‐profit organisations," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 534-554, July.
    6. Panagiotis Dimitropoulos & Ioannis Kosmas & Ioannis Douvis, 2017. "Implementing the balanced scorecard in a local government sport organization," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 66(3), pages 362-379, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amandine Maus, 2022. "Construire et transmettre de la légitimité. Le cas de deux programmes d'accompagnement de l'économie sociale et solidaire," Post-Print hal-03864847, HAL.
    2. Tuomas Korhonen & Virpi Sillanpää & Aki Jääskeläinen, 2023. "Anchor practices that guide horizontal performance measurement: an interventionist case study of the financial aspect of new technology implementation in healthcare," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(3), pages 787-816, September.
    3. Sohail, Kanza & Belitski, Maksim & Castro Christiansen, Liza, 2023. "Developing business incubation process frameworks: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Christina Theodoraki & Alexis Catanzaro, 2022. "Widening the borders of entrepreneurial ecosystem through the international lens," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 383-406, April.
    5. Vidit Mohan & Rohan Chinchwadkar, 2022. "Technology Business Incubation: A Literature Review and Gaps," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 53-63, June.
    6. Klofsten, Magnus & Lundmark, Erik & Wennberg, Karl & Bank, Megan, 2019. "Incubator specialization and size: divergent paths towards operational scale," Ratio Working Papers 326, The Ratio Institute.
    7. Jitender Kumar & Neha Prince & H. Kent Baker, 2022. "Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Issues," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 11(2), pages 147-161, June.
    8. Kurt Schobel & Peter Drogosiewicz, 2018. "Adoption Of The Balanced Scorecard By Municipal Governments: Evidence From Canada," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14.
    9. Xiao-Hai Weng & Yu-Ming Zhu & Xiao-Yu Song & Naveed Ahmad, 2019. "Identification of Key Success Factors for Private Science Parks Established from Brownfield Regeneration: A Case Study from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Brian J. Bergman & Jeffery S. McMullen, 2022. "Helping Entrepreneurs Help Themselves: A Review and Relational Research Agenda on Entrepreneurial Support Organizations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 688-728, May.
    11. Photchanaphisut Pattanasak & Tanyanuparb Anantana & Boontarika Paphawasit & Ratapol Wudhikarn, 2022. "Critical Factors and Performance Measurement of Business Incubators: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-39, April.
    12. Aureli, Selena & Del Baldo, Mara, 2019. "Performance measurement in the networked context of convention and visitors bureaus (CVBs)," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 92-105.
    13. Amir Hossein Azadnia & Simon Stephens & Pezhman Ghadimi & George Onofrei, 2022. "A comprehensive performance measurement framework for business incubation centres: Empirical evidence in an Irish context," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2437-2455, July.
    14. Yi Zhang & Patrick Sik-Wah Fong & Daniel Yamoah Agyemang, 2021. "What Should Be Focused on When Digital Transformation Hits Industries? Literature Review of Business Management Adaptability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-30, December.
    15. Pengran Zhou & Pengfei Zhou & Serhat Yüksel & Hasan Dinçer & Gülsüm Sena Uluer, 2019. "Balanced Scorecard-Based Evaluation of Sustainable Energy Investment Projects with IT2 Fuzzy Hybrid Decision Making Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Hasan Boudlaie & Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Sabihe Shamsi & Vahid Jafari-Sadeghi & Alexeis Garcia-Pereze, 2020. "Designing a human resource scorecard: An empirical stakeholder-based study with a company culture perspective," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 16(4), pages 113-147.
    17. Karim Messeghem & Sylvie Sammut & Leila Temri & Etienne St-Jean, 2020. "Les mutations de l’accompagnement entrepreneurial," Post-Print hal-02863801, HAL.
    18. Leomara Battisti Telles & Luciano Medina Macedo & Juliana Vitória Messias Bittencourt, 2017. "Brazilian Solidarity Economy Rural Organizations: Validating Performance Evaluation Criteria Based on Decision Makers’ Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    19. Sansone, Giuliano & Andreotti, Pietro & Colombelli, Alessandra & Landoni, Paolo, 2020. "Are social incubators different from other incubators? Evidence from Italy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. Chandra, Dheeraj & Kumar, Dinesh, 2021. "Evaluating the effect of key performance indicators of vaccine supply chain on sustainable development of mission indradhanush: A structural equation modeling approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:23:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11115-022-00646-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.