IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4610-d792254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Factors and Performance Measurement of Business Incubators: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Photchanaphisut Pattanasak

    (Department of Knowledge and Innovation Management, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Tanyanuparb Anantana

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    Science and Technology Park, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Boontarika Paphawasit

    (Department of Modern Management and Information Technology, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    A Research Group of Modern Management and Information Technology, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Ratapol Wudhikarn

    (Department of Knowledge and Innovation Management, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    A Research Group of Modern Management and Information Technology, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

Abstract

Business incubators (BIs) are important supporters for young businesses, since they provide firms with physical facilities and intangible support. Existing literature reviews focusing on BIs have neglected to consider individual factors in their success in favor of combining key performance measurements to identify their development targets. This systematic literature review thus aimed to combine studies that examined specific issues pertaining to BI performance and related key performance indicators to measure their activities. We conducted a systematic literature review based on two research questions: the first research question concerned critical factors for BIs’ performance; the second concerned their performance measurements. To ensure that we covered crucial factors and indicators of the latest generation of BIs, our systematic procedure included 74 studies published between 2005 and 2020 that were read in full and revealed ten critical factors that particularly emphasized financial resources and networking. We identified six categories for performance measurement, placing the greatest emphasis on the measurement of social capital. We recommend that academic researchers and BIs prioritize the intangible factors that constitute organizations’ hidden value. This review thus provides novel findings by identifying common critical factors for BIs’ performance and offering guidelines for performance measurement that consider BIs’ intangible assets and trends for future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Photchanaphisut Pattanasak & Tanyanuparb Anantana & Boontarika Paphawasit & Ratapol Wudhikarn, 2022. "Critical Factors and Performance Measurement of Business Incubators: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-39, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4610-:d:792254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4610/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4610/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali J. Ahmad & Courtney Thornberry, 2018. "On the structure of business incubators: de-coupling issues and the mis-alignment of managerial incentives," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1190-1212, October.
    2. Monika Dhochak & Satya Ranjan Acharya & S.B. Sareen, 2019. "Assessing the effectiveness of business incubators," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(2), pages 177-194.
    3. Jaroslav Belas & Beata Gavurova & Martin Cepel & Matus Kubak, 2020. "Evaluation of economic potential of business environment development by comparing sector differences: perspective of SMEs in Czech Republic and Slovakia," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 11(1), pages 135-159, March.
    4. Mário Franco & Heiko Haase & Sandra Correia, 2018. "Exploring Factors in the Success of Creative Incubators: a Cultural Entrepreneurship Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(1), pages 239-262, March.
    5. Li Xiao & David North, 2018. "The role of Technological Business Incubators in supporting business innovation in China: a case of regional adaptability?," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1-2), pages 29-57, January.
    6. Ehsan Soltanifar & Abbas Keramati & Rahele Moshki, 2012. "An innovative model of business management in knowledge-based organisations: the case of the business incubators," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(5), pages 573-596.
    7. Muhammad Binsawad & Osama Sohaib & Igor Hawryszkiewycz, 2019. "Factors Impacting Technology Business Incubator Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(01), pages 1-30, January.
    8. Wadid Lamine & Sarfraz Mian & Alain Fayolle & Mike Wright & Magnus Klofsten & Henry Etzkowitz, 2018. "Technology business incubation mechanisms and sustainable regional development," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1121-1141, October.
    9. Karim Messeghem & Chaffik Bakkali & Sylvie Sammut & Abdelaziz Swalhi, 2018. "Measuring Nonprofit Incubator Performance: Toward an Adapted Balanced Scorecard Approach," Post-Print halshs-01948730, HAL.
    10. Schaeffer, Véronique, 2019. "The use of material transfer agreements in academia: A threat to open science or a cooperation tool?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    11. Nair, Sujith & Blomquist, Tomas, 2021. "Exploring docility: A behavioral approach to interventions in business incubation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    12. Benjamin Vedel & Inès Gabarret, 2014. "The role of trust as mediator between contract, information and knowledge within business incubators," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(4), pages 509-527.
    13. Kanchan Lala & Kunal Sinha, 2019. "Role of Technology Incubation in India’s Innovation System: A Case of the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Incubation Centre," Millennial Asia, , vol. 10(1), pages 91-110, April.
    14. Lois Peters & Mark Rice & Malavika Sundararajan, 2004. "The Role of Incubators in the Entrepreneurial Process," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 83-91, January.
    15. Marijn A. Weele & Frank J. Rijnsoever & Menno Groen & Ellen H. M. Moors, 2020. "Gimme shelter? Heterogeneous preferences for tangible and intangible resources when choosing an incubator," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 984-1015, August.
    16. Danny Soetanto & Sarah Jack, 2013. "Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 432-453, August.
    17. Ferreiro Seoane, Francisco Jesús & Del Campo Villares, Manuel Octavio & Camino Santos, Marta, 2015. "Analysis of business incubators in Galicia through the «Integral Model of economic profitability»," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 33, pages 7-31.
    18. Chenghua Guan & Ye Fan, 2020. "The Impact of Social Networks on the Operating Efficiency of Chinese Technology Business Incubators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, March.
    19. J. Piet Hausberg & Sabrina Korreck, 2020. "Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 151-176, February.
    20. Maria Lúcia Pato & Aurora A. C. Teixeira, 2020. "Determinants of performance of new ventures located in Portuguese incubators and science parks with a focus on institutional factors: do rural and urban new ventures differ?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(8), pages 1619-1638, August.
    21. Ruth Oriama & Robert Mudida & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2021. "Capturing niche development in secondary disease prevention through a salutogenesis-bioeconomy framework: trends from Kenya," Post-Print hal-03583614, HAL.
    22. Sagath, Daniel & van Burg, Elco & Cornelissen, Joep P. & Giannopapa, Christina, 2019. "Identifying design principles for business incubation in the European space sector," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 1-1.
    23. Radosław Wolniak & Michalene Eva Grebski & Bożena Skotnicka-Zasadzień, 2019. "Comparative Analysis of the Level of Satisfaction with the Services Received at the Business Incubators (Hazleton, PA, USA and Gliwice, Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, May.
    24. Marijn van Weele & Frank J. Rijnsoever & Chris P. Eveleens & Henk Steinz & Niels Stijn & Menno Groen, 2018. "Start-EU-up! Lessons from international incubation practices to address the challenges faced by Western European start-ups," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1161-1189, October.
    25. Andreea F. Schiopu & Dragos C. Vasile & Claudia E. Tuclea, 2015. "Principles and Best Practices in Successful Tourism Business Incubators," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(38), pages 474-474, February.
    26. Manuel Octavio Del Campo Villares & Vanessa Miguéns-Refojo & Francisco Jesús Ferreiro-Seoane, 2020. "Business Survival and the Influence of Innovation on Entrepreneurs in Business Incubators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    27. Fernández Fernández, M. Teresa & Santos, Juan Luis & Blanco Jiménez, Francisco José, 2019. "Performance of business incubators and accelerators according to the regional entrepreneurship ecosystem in Spain," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 43, pages 41-56.
    28. Florence Malsch & Gilles Guieu, 2019. "How to get more with less? Scarce resources and high social ambition: effectuation as KM tool in social entrepreneurial projects," Post-Print halshs-02425551, HAL.
    29. Benjamin Vedel & Ines Gabarret, 2014. "The Role of Trust as Mediator between Contract, Information and Knowledge within Business Incubators," Post-Print hal-01886222, HAL.
    30. Lindile Ndabeni, 2008. "The contribution of business incubators and technology stations to small enterprise development in South Africa," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 259-268.
    31. Fini, Riccardo & Grimaldi, Rosa & Meoli, Azzurra, 2020. "The effectiveness of university regulations to foster science-based entrepreneurship," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(10).
    32. Ernesto Tavoletti, 2013. "Business Incubators: Effective Infrastructures or Waste of Public Money? Looking for a Theoretical Framework, Guidelines and Criteria," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 4(4), pages 423-443, December.
    33. Eloy Sentana & Reyes González & José Gascó & Juan LLopis, 2017. "The social profitability of business incubators: a measurement proposal," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1-2), pages 116-136, January.
    34. María Redondo & Carmen Camarero, 2019. "Social Capital in University Business Incubators: dimensions, antecedents and outcomes," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 599-624, June.
    35. Nobuya Fukugawa, 2018. "Is the impact of incubator’s ability on incubation performance contingent on technologies and life cycle stages of startups?: evidence from Japan," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 457-478, June.
    36. Sahib Sartaj Singh & Bikram Jit Singh & Dinesh Khanduja, 2015. "Synthesising TBI-relevance in India through Six Sigma approach," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(3/4), pages 256-283.
    37. Wonglimpiyarat, Jarunee, 2016. "The innovation incubator, university business incubator and technology transfer strategy: The case of Thailand," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 18-27.
    38. Helen Haugh, 2020. "Call the midwife! Business incubators as entrepreneurial enablers in developing economies," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1-2), pages 156-175, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adelaide Martins & Manuel Castelo Branco & Pedro Novo Melo & Carolina Machado, 2022. "Sustainability in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Hu, Yubei & Ahmad, Ali J. & Lu, Dawei, 2023. "Performance management challenges at Chinese business incubators: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Olcay Özge Ersöz & Ali Fırat İnal & Adnan Aktepe & Ahmet Kürşad Türker & Süleyman Ersöz, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review of the Predictive Maintenance from Transportation Systems Aspect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Aleksandra Figurek & Alkis Thrassou, 2023. "An Integrated Framework for Sustainable Development in Agri-Food SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian J. Bergman & Jeffery S. McMullen, 2022. "Helping Entrepreneurs Help Themselves: A Review and Relational Research Agenda on Entrepreneurial Support Organizations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 688-728, May.
    2. Nathasit Gerdsri & Boonkiart Iewwongcharoen & Kittichai Rajchamaha & Nisit Manotungvorapun & Jakapong Pongthanaisawan & Watcharin Witthayaweerasak, 2021. "Capability Assessment toward Sustainable Development of Business Incubators: Framework and Experience Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Amir Hossein Azadnia & Simon Stephens & Pezhman Ghadimi & George Onofrei, 2022. "A comprehensive performance measurement framework for business incubation centres: Empirical evidence in an Irish context," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2437-2455, July.
    4. Sohail, Kanza & Belitski, Maksim & Castro Christiansen, Liza, 2023. "Developing business incubation process frameworks: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    5. Vidit Mohan & Rohan Chinchwadkar, 2022. "Technology Business Incubation: A Literature Review and Gaps," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 53-63, June.
    6. Kameliya Deyanova & Nataliia Brehmer & Artur Lapidus & Victor Tiberius & Steve Walsh, 2022. "Hatching start-ups for sustainable growth: a bibliometric review on business incubators," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(7), pages 2083-2109, October.
    7. Klofsten, Magnus & Lundmark, Erik & Wennberg, Karl & Bank, Nata, 2020. "Incubator specialization and size: Divergent paths towards operational scale," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Sansone, Giuliano & Andreotti, Pietro & Colombelli, Alessandra & Landoni, Paolo, 2020. "Are social incubators different from other incubators? Evidence from Italy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    9. Manuel Octavio Del Campo Villares & Vanessa Miguéns-Refojo & Francisco Jesús Ferreiro-Seoane, 2020. "Business Survival and the Influence of Innovation on Entrepreneurs in Business Incubators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Roberto Vaz & Sandrina Francisca Teixeira & João Vidal de Carvalho, 2022. "Comfortable but Not Brilliant: Exploring the Incubation Experience of Founders of Technology-Based Startups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    11. Klofsten, Magnus & Lundmark, Erik & Wennberg, Karl & Bank, Megan, 2019. "Incubator specialization and size: divergent paths towards operational scale," Ratio Working Papers 326, The Ratio Institute.
    12. Nair, Sujith & Blomquist, Tomas, 2021. "Exploring docility: A behavioral approach to interventions in business incubation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    13. van Rijnsoever, Frank J. & Eveleens, Chris P., 2021. "Money Don't matter? How incubation experience affects start-up entrepreneurs' resource valuation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    14. Roberto Vaz & João Vidal de Carvalho & Sandrina Francisca Teixeira, 2023. "Developing a Digital Business Incubator Model to Foster Entrepreneurship, Business Growth, and Academia–Industry Connections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-29, April.
    15. Wang, Zhaoxing & He, Qile & Xia, Senmao & Sarpong, David & Xiong, Ailun & Maas, Gideon, 2020. "Capacities of business incubator and regional innovation performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Kamran Ahmed Siddiqui & Mohammad Emad Al-Shaikh & Ishtiaq Ahmed Bajwa & Abdulaziz Al-Subaie, 2021. "Identifying critical success factors for university business incubators in Saudi Arabia," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 267-279, March.
    17. Christina Theodoraki & Alexis Catanzaro, 2022. "Widening the borders of entrepreneurial ecosystem through the international lens," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 383-406, April.
    18. Natalya Radko & Maksim Belitski & Yelena Kalyuzhnova, 2023. "Conceptualising the entrepreneurial university: the stakeholder approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 955-1044, June.
    19. Xiangfei Yuan & Haijing Hao & Chenghua Guan & Alex Pentland, 2021. "What are the key components of an entrepreneurial ecosystem in a developing economy? A longitudinal empirical study on technology business incubators in China," Papers 2103.08131, arXiv.org.
    20. Zhou, Junbi & Wang, Mingyue, 2023. "The role of government-industry-academia partnership in business incubation: Evidence from new R&D institutions in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4610-:d:792254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.