IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05179438.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The income-labour nexus as the dominant institutional form in rural sub-Saharan Africa. How youth transition helps to understand structural change

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Girard

    (UMR ART-Dev - Acteurs, Ressources et Territoires dans le Développement - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Sandrine Michel

    (UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Sara Mercandalli

    (UMR ART-Dev - Acteurs, Ressources et Territoires dans le Développement - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Bruno Losch

    (UMR ART-Dev - Acteurs, Ressources et Territoires dans le Développement - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UM - Université de Montpellier)

Abstract

The unprecedented population growth and low economic diversification in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) raise questions about possible paths for demo-economic transitions. Given the limitations of the dominant macroeconomic conception of structural change for analysing economic transformations in SSA, and acknowledging the importance of rural economies in SSA, this paper argues for an alternative approach to structural change that uses the rural household as the key unit of analysis of change. Structural change is therefore impacted by the evolution of the socioeconomic reproduction patterns of rural households. To understand these households' reproduction patterns, the paper formulates an analytical framework centred on structures, institutions and their evolution. Drawing on Régulation theory, we first adjust institutional forms to rural African contexts. We then demonstrate how the income-labour nexus, integrating the social relations linked to the organisation of the production process and the modes of reproduction, is the dominant institutional form in capturing the socioeconomic reproduction of rural households. Last, to detect these emerging institutional configurations, we analyse youth transition as the critical period of households' socioeconomic reproduction that can reveal structural change.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Girard & Sandrine Michel & Sara Mercandalli & Bruno Losch, 2022. "The income-labour nexus as the dominant institutional form in rural sub-Saharan Africa. How youth transition helps to understand structural change," Post-Print hal-05179438, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05179438
    DOI: 10.4000/regulation.21157
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05179438v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05179438v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4000/regulation.21157?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julien Vercueil, 2013. "Vers une économie institutionnelle du changement : Clarifier les concepts et leurs articulations," Post-Print halshs-01420820, HAL.
    2. Guillaume Soullier & Paule Moustier, 2018. "Impacts of contract farming in domestic grain chains on farmer income and food insecurity. Contrasted evidence from Senegal," Post-Print hal-02621852, HAL.
    3. Woodhouse, Philip, 2003. "African Enclosures: A Default Mode of Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1705-1720, October.
    4. Lidewyde Berckmoes & Ben White, 2014. "Youth, Farming and Precarity in Rural Burundi," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 26(2), pages 190-203, April.
    5. Soullier, Guillaume & Moustier, Paule, 2018. "Impacts of contract farming in domestic grain chains on farmer income and food insecurity. Contrasted evidence from Senegal," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 179-198.
    6. Thomas Lamarche & Pascal Grouiez & Martino Nieddu & Jean-Pierre Chanteau & Agnès Labrousse & Sandrine Michel & Julien Vercueil, 2021. "Saisir les processus méso : une approche régulationniste," Post-Print hal-02998010, HAL.
    7. Hulme, David, 2000. "Impact Assessment Methodologies for Microfinance: Theory, Experience and Better Practice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 79-98, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumse, Kaittisak & Suzuki, Nobuhiro & Sato, Takeshi & Demont, Matty, 2021. "The spillover effect of direct competition between marketing cooperatives and private intermediaries: Evidence from the Thai rice value chain," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Khan, Muhammad Fawad & Nakano, Yuko & Kurosaki, Takashi, 2019. "Impact of contract farming on land productivity and income of maize and potato growers in Pakistan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 28-39.
    3. Arouna, Aminou & Michler, Jeffrey D. & Lokossou, Jourdain C., 2021. "Contract farming and rural transformation: Evidence from a field experiment in Benin," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Bethelhem Legesse Debela & Anette Ruml & Matin Qaim, 2022. "Effects of contract farming on diets and nutrition in Ghana," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(2), pages 911-929, June.
    5. Xufang Zhang & Minghua Zhao & Xiaojie Wang & Rongqing Han, 2022. "Regional Differences of Farmers’ Willingness to Grow Grain and Its Influencing Factors in Shandong Province under the Background of New-Type Urbanization," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Nguyen, Thi Cam Van & Magezi, Eustadius Francis & Sumita, Tsuyoshi, 2023. "Inclusion of Smallholders in Staple Food Contract Farming: A Case of Firm-Cooperative-Farmer Coordination in Thai Binh Province, Vietnam," Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics (formerly Japanese Journal of Rural Economics), Agricultural Economics Society of Japan (AESJ), vol. 25.
    7. Otsuka, Keijiro & Ali, Mubarik, 2020. "Strategy for the development of agro-based clusters," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    8. Pan Liu & Jiamin Zhu & Wenwen Pan & Bingjun Li & Qian Liu, 2025. "Factors affecting grain loss reduction efforts among Chinese farmers," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 71(8), pages 423-432.
    9. Ba, Hélène A. & de Mey, Yann & Thoron, Sylvie & Demont, Matty, 2019. "Inclusiveness of contract farming along the vertical coordination continuum: Evidence from the Vietnamese rice sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. Rantlo, AM & Bohloa, M, 2022. "Factors influencing broiler farmers’ participation in contract farming in Lesotho," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 22(09).
    11. Emma Tyrou & Guillaume Soullier & Mamadou Coulibaly, 2023. "Unpacking policies for the development of agricultural growth poles in West Africa," Post-Print hal-03983251, HAL.
    12. Junjin Chen & Hong Zhou, 2023. "The Role of Contract Farming in Green Smart Agricultural Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Yehia Zahran & Hazem S. Kassem & Shimaa M. Naba & Bader Alhafi Alotaibi, 2020. "Shifting from Fragmentation to Integration: A Proposed Framework for Strengthening Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System in Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, June.
    14. Carlos Manuel Hernández & Aliou Faye & Mamadou Ousseynou Ly & Zachary P. Stewart & P. V. Vara Prasad & Leonardo Mendes Bastos & Luciana Nieto & Ana J. P. Carcedo & Ignacio Antonio Ciampitti, 2021. "Soil and Climate Characterization to Define Environments for Summer Crops in Senegal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Viet Hoang & Vinh Nguyen, 2023. "Determinants of small farmers' participation in contract farming in developing countries: A study in Vietnam," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 836-853, July.
    16. Emma Tyrou & Vincent Ribier & Guillaume Soullier, 2019. "How do I build my agricultural growth pole?," Post-Print hal-03988919, HAL.
    17. Guillaume Soullier & Paule Moustier, 2021. "The modernization of the rice value chain in Senegal: A move towards the Asian Quiet Revolution?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(S1), pages 81-101, August.
    18. Odountan Ambaliou Olounlade & Gu-Cheng Li & Sènakpon E. Haroll Kokoye & François Vihôdé Dossouhoui & Kuassi Auxence Aristide Akpa & Dessalegn Anshiso & Gauthier Biaou, 2020. "Impact of Participation in Contract Farming on Smallholder Farmers’ Income and Food Security in Rural Benin: PSM and LATE Parameter Combined," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Jessica Noromalala Andriamparany & Hendrik Hänke & Eva Schlecht, 2021. "Food security and food quality among vanilla farmers in Madagascar: the role of contract farming and livestock keeping," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(4), pages 981-1012, August.
    20. Guillaume Soullier & Paule Moustier & Frédéric Lançon, 2019. "Risks of smallholder exclusion from upgrading food chains," Post-Print hal-05174281, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05179438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.