IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04840171.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How to deal with Big Tech power? The “Big Tech Raj”, a new form of biopower in the digital age

Author

Listed:
  • Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte

    (LEM - Lille économie management - UMR 9221 - UA - Université d'Artois - UCL - Université catholique de Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Emmanuel Bertin

    (IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris)

Abstract

Big Tech has profoundly reconfigured societies. With their size, financial power, logics of data extraction and accumulation, social influence, geopolitical role, and accomplishments of state missions, Big Tech firms have quickly gained a reputation as "new digital governments." However, academic research (notably platform, innovation, and information systems research) is rather uncritical of Big Tech's power. In this conceptual paper, we problematize the nature, meaning, and implications of Big Tech's power by proposing an integrative framework on "biopower" (rooted in "pastoral power," biopower refers to the subtle and pervasive regulation of life in modern societies). Drawing from Foucault's work, we argue that Big Tech firms produce a new form of biopower in the digital era by virtue of their material configurations (constituted by technology, such as applications, algorithms, AI systems), which create conditions for steering people's conduct. We use the "raj" metaphor (we refer to the ruling power exercised by the British East India Company in 17th century) to characterize Big Tech's power, which we describe as the "Big Tech Raj," thus detailing the significant evolutions, extensions, and sophistication in the target, scope, relationships, and purpose of classic pastoral power. We discuss the implications of this power (in terms of possible resistance and counter-conducts) and call for more scholarly attention to them.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte & Emmanuel Bertin, 2024. "How to deal with Big Tech power? The “Big Tech Raj”, a new form of biopower in the digital age," Post-Print hal-04840171, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04840171
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123732
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04840171v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline R. Amendola & James P. Mahaffey & Seth J. Parker & Ian M. Ahearn & Wei-Ching Chen & Mo Zhou & Helen Court & Jie Shi & Sebastian L. Mendoza & Michael J. Morten & Eli Rothenberg & Eyal Gottlieb, 2019. "KRAS4A directly regulates hexokinase 1," Nature, Nature, vol. 576(7787), pages 482-486, December.
    2. Nea, 2019. "National legislative and regulatory activities," Nuclear Law Bulletin, OECD Publishing, vol. 2018(2).
    3. Heijmans, Roweno J.R.K. & Gerlagh, Reyer, 2019. "Regulating Global Externalities," Other publications TiSEM 9a0a6f7a-f8d0-4495-8aed-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Frantz Rowe & M. Lynne Markus, 2022. "Taking the measure of digital giants: Amazon and the Social Welfare Computing research agenda," Post-Print hal-04473815, HAL.
    5. Kruti Surti & Sandra J E Langeslag, 2019. "Perceived ability to regulate love," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Chen,Rong - DECID & Divanbeigi,Raian, 2019. "Can Regulation Promote Financial Inclusion ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8711, The World Bank.
    7. Gupta, Shivam & Justy, Théo & Kamboj, Shampy & Kumar, Ajay & Kristoffersen, Eivind, 2021. "Big data and firm marketing performance: Findings from knowledge-based view," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    8. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelanoitte & Robin Holt, 2019. "Communities versus platforms: The paradox in the body of the collaborative economy," Post-Print hal-02107247, HAL.
    9. Alaimo, Cristina & Kallinikos, Jannis & Vallderama-Venegas, E, 2020. "Platforms as service ecosystems: lessons from social media," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101474, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Marc A. C. Hafstead & Roberton C. Williams III, 2020. "Jobs and Environmental Regulation," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 192-240.
    11. Comeig, Irene & Klaser, Klaudijo & Pinar, Lucía D., 2022. "The paradox of (Inter)net neutrality: An experiment on ex-ante antitrust regulation✰," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    12. Steve Cicala & Ethan M. J. Lieber & Victoria Marone, 2019. "Regulating Markups in US Health Insurance," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 71-104, October.
    13. Oecd, 2019. "Independent Sector Regulators," OECD Roundtables on Competition Policy Papers 239, OECD Publishing.
    14. Andreas Georg Scherer & Andreas Rasche & Guido Palazzo & André Spicer, 2016. "Managing for Political Corporate Social Responsibility: New Challenges and Directions for PCSR 2.0," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 273-298, May.
    15. Ofir Turel & Alexander Serenko, 2012. "The benefits and dangers of enjoyment with social networking websites," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 512-528, September.
    16. Frantz Rowe, 2010. "Valuing worldwide diversity in a European spirit: being more critical and open," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 495-500, October.
    17. Amrit Tiwana, 2015. "Evolutionary Competition in Platform Ecosystems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 266-281, June.
    18. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    19. Esther Gal-Or & Ronen Gal-Or & Nabita Penmetsa, 2018. "The Role of User Privacy Concerns in Shaping Competition Among Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 698-722, September.
    20. Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte & Jeremy Aroles, 2020. "Does the end justify the means?Information systems and control society in the age of pandemics," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 746-761, November.
    21. Frantz Rowe, 2012. "Toward a richer diversity of genres in information systems research: new categorization and guidelines," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 469-478, September.
    22. Frantz Rowe, 2018. "Being critical is good, but better with philosophy! From digital transformation and values to the future of IS research," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 380-393, May.
    23. Shivam Gupta & Théo Justy & Shampy Kamboj & Ajay Kumar & Eivind Kristoffersen, 2021. "Big data and firm marketing performance: Findings from knowledge-based view," Post-Print hal-03609916, HAL.
    24. Frantz Rowe & Ojelanki Ngwenyama & Jean-Loup Richet, 2020. "Contact-tracing apps and alienation in the age of COVID-19," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 545-562, September.
    25. Tamara Dinev, 2014. "Why would we care about privacy?," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 97-102, March.
    26. Frantz Rowe & M. Lynne Markus, 2022. "Taking the measure of digital giants: Amazon and the Social Welfare Computing research agenda," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 437-446, June.
    27. Irina Heimbach & Oliver Hinz, 2018. "The Impact of Sharing Mechanism Design on Content Sharing in Online Social Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 592-611, September.
    28. Carliss Y. Baldwin & C. Jason Woodard, 2009. "The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View," Chapters, in: Annabelle Gawer (ed.), Platforms, Markets and Innovation, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    29. Brewis, Claire & Dibb, Sally & Meadows, Maureen, 2023. "Leveraging big data for strategic marketing: A dynamic capabilities model for incumbent firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    30. Chen,Rong - DECAG, 2019. "Policy and Regulatory Issues with Digital Businesses," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8948, The World Bank.
    31. Edgar A. Whitley & Uri Gal & Annemette Kjaergaard, 2014. "Who do you think you are? A review of the complex interplay between information systems, identification and identity," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 17-35, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed Al‐Hamdani & Kayla M. Joyce & Tristan Park & Megan E. Cowie & Sherry H. Stewart, 2021. "Cannabis packaging: An opportunity for facilitating informed decisions," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 1150-1168, September.
    2. Agarwala, Rashi & Satyanarayana, Krishna & Chandrashekar, Deepak & Srinivasan, R., 2025. "How does a digital business-to-business platform transform logistics management in manufacturing firms? – An examination," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Peng, Hui & Lu, Yaobin & Gupta, Sumeet, 2023. "Promoting value emergence through digital platform ecosystems: Perspectives on resource integration in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Felix B. Buesching & Dennis M. Steininger & Daniel J. Veit, 2023. "Governing digital crisis responses: platform standards and the dilemma of COVID-19 contact tracing," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 267-323, January.
    5. Schmück, Kilian & Schückes, Magnus & Gutmann, Tobias & Gassmann, Oliver, 2025. "Less trust, more truth: Implications and design choices for business models and platform ecosystems in the age of Web3," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    6. Christian Bartelheimer, Philipp zur Heiden, Hedda Lüttenberg, Daniel Beverungen, 2021. "Systematizing the Lexicon of Platforms in Information Systems: A Data-Driven Study," Working Papers Dissertations 79, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    7. Baabdullah, Abdullah M. & Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Algharabat, Raed S. & Metri, Bhimaraya & Rana, Nripendra P., 2022. "Virtual agents and flow experience: An empirical examination of AI-powered chatbots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    8. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    9. Brewis, Claire & Dibb, Sally & Meadows, Maureen, 2023. "Leveraging big data for strategic marketing: A dynamic capabilities model for incumbent firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    10. Yeo, Sook Fern & Tan, Cheng Ling & Kumar, Ajay & Tan, Kim Hua & Wong, Jee Kit, 2022. "Investigating the impact of AI-powered technologies on Instagrammers’ purchase decisions in digitalization era–A study of the fashion and apparel industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    11. Zander, Udo & Lu, Lixin & Chimenti, Gianluca, 2025. "The platform economy and futures of market societies: Salient tensions in ecosystem evolution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    12. Wang, Fengquan & Jiang, Jihai & Cosenz, Federico, 2025. "Understanding data-driven business model innovation in complexity: A system dynamics approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    13. Zhong, Qi & Sun, Yaowu, 2020. "The more the better? Relational governance in platforms and the role of appropriability mechanisms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 62-73.
    14. Etienne Thenoz & Solène Juteau & Frantz Rowe, 2024. "E-commerce transformation: A literature review from an institutional and organizational perspective," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Erik Hartigh & Claire C.M. Stolwijk & J. Roland Ortt & L. Matthijs Punter, 2023. "Configurations of digital platforms for manufacturing: An analysis of seven cases according to platform functions and types," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    17. Andreas Hein & Maximilian Schreieck & Tobias Riasanow & David Soto Setzke & Manuel Wiesche & Markus Böhm & Helmut Krcmar, 2020. "Digital platform ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 87-98, March.
    18. Konrad Degen & Alexander Gleiss, 2025. "Time to break up? The case for tailor-made digital platform regulation based on platform-governance standard types," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Eachempati, Prajwal & Srivastava, Praveen Ranjan & Kumar, Ajay & Muñoz de Prat, Javier & Delen, Dursun, 2022. "Can customer sentiment impact firm value? An integrated text mining approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Barbier, Raphaëlle & Ben Yahia, Skander & Lenfle, Sylvain & Weil, Benoit, 2024. "Data-push innovation beyond serendipity: The case of a digital platform making Earth Observation data fit into multiple use contexts," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04840171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.