IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04391369.html

Understanding the integration of digital service companies in supply chains via the concept of intermediation
[Approche de l'intégration des entreprises de services du numérique dans les supply chains à travers le concept d'intermédiation]

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Antoine Manzanares

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon)

  • Vichara Kin

    (CRET-LOG - Centre de Recherche sur le Transport et la Logistique - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Benyamin Aghhavani-Shajari

    (Excelia Group | La Rochelle Business School)

Abstract

Although Logistics Service Providers (LSP) historically played the major intermediary role for physical and digital flows between different actors in Supply Chains (SC), over time it is digital companies that have taken the place of LSP and have become the new major intermediaries in SC. While this role change has an impact on inter-organizational relationships (IORs), the literature on logistics intermediation and organization strategy has little studied this phenomenon. Therefore, this study is interested in understanding how the mobilization of the concept of intermediation in a context of digitalization of the SC is opportune in the management of the relations maintained between the order giver (called principal in this paper because he chooses the digital company and the LSP to work with), the LSP and the digital company, generating the digital intermediation. To do this, the research aims to theorize the triadic relationship formed by the principal, the digital company and the LSP on the model of previous research carried out in the retail sector. From a managerial point of view, the research allows us to consider managerial reading grids to understand and act within the framework of digital intermediation, and to identify the success factors as well as the main risks associated with the latter. The research is a continuation of Pardo (2015) work on the analysis of triadic relationships in the retail sector, with the aim of applying the research approach in a digital intermediation context. LOMAK, in a process of digital transformation, is an ideal empirical ground to understand how a principal-digital company dyad can influence the relationships in the principal-LSP dyad within principal-digital company-LSP triad.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Antoine Manzanares & Vichara Kin & Benyamin Aghhavani-Shajari, 2023. "Understanding the integration of digital service companies in supply chains via the concept of intermediation [Approche de l'intégration des entreprises de services du numérique dans les supply chains à travers le concept d'intermédiation]," Post-Print hal-04391369, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04391369
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04391369v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04391369v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mattiuzzo, N. & Le Goff, J., 1997. "Les prestataires logistiques et la distribution pharmaceutique. Les barrieres a l'entree: vitres blindees ou glaces sans tain," Papers 97-08, Institut de Recherche en Gestion. Universite de Paris XII-.
    2. Howells, Jeremy, 2006. "Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 715-728, June.
    3. François Fulconis & Laurence Saglietto, 2018. "Numéro spécial sur la thématique « Prestations et prestataires de services logistiques (PSL) : l’heure du renouveau »," Post-Print hal-01943940, HAL.
    4. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    5. Aurélia Lefaix-Durand & Diane Poulin & Robert Beauregard & Robert Kozak, 2006. "Relations interorganisationnelles et création de valeur. Synthèse et perspectives," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 164(5), pages 205-227.
    6. Catherine Pardo & Gilles Paché, 2015. "Commerce de gros, commerce inter-entreprises : Les enjeux de l'intermédiation," Post-Print hal-02298207, HAL.
    7. Elena Belavina & Karan Girotra, 2012. "The Relational Advantages of Intermediation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(9), pages 1614-1631, September.
    8. Joan Le Goff & Nathalie Mattiuzzo, 1997. "Les prestataires logistiques et la distribution pharmaceutique. Les barrières à l’entrée : vitres blindées ou glaces sans tain ?," Post-Print hal-03253643, HAL.
    9. Gérard Roveillo & François Fulconis & Gilles Paché, 2012. "Vers une dilution des frontières de l’organisation : le prestataire de services logistiques (PSL) comme pilote aux interfaces," Post-Print hal-02488903, HAL.
    10. Marc Filser, 2012. "Intermédiation et création de valeur dans les canaux : une revue de littérature," Post-Print hal-00685426, HAL.
    11. Nathalie Fabbe-Costes, 2000. "Le rôle transformatif des SIC et TIC sur les interfaces multi-acteurs de la distribution et de la logistique," Post-Print hal-03313097, HAL.
    12. François Fulconis & Gérard Roveillo, 2017. "L’intermédiation logistique dans le pilotage des chaînes multi-acteurs : proposition d’une grille d’analyse," Post-Print hal-01790210, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suresh P. Sethi & Sushil Gupta & Vipin K. Agrawal & Vijay K. Agrawal, 2022. "Nobel laureates’ contributions to and impacts on operations management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4283-4303, December.
    2. Dushnitsky, Gary & Klueter, Thomas, 2017. "Which industries are served by online marketplaces for technology?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 651-666.
    3. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 2002. "Political economics and public finance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 24, pages 1549-1659, Elsevier.
    4. Qiuyue Xia & Lu Li & Jie Dong & Bin Zhang, 2021. "Reduction Effect and Mechanism Analysis of Carbon Trading Policy on Carbon Emissions from Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Frans P. Vries & Nick Hanley, 2016. "Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(4), pages 687-702, April.
    6. Usher, Dan, 2001. "Personal goods, efficiency and the law," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 673-703, November.
    7. George Tridimas & Stanley L. Winer, 2018. "On the Definition and Nature of Fiscal Coercion," Carleton Economic Papers 18-09, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
    8. Stephanie Rosenkranz & Patrick W. Schmitz, 2007. "Can Coasean Bargaining Justify Pigouvian Taxation?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 74(296), pages 573-585, November.
    9. Stefan Ambec & Yann Kervinio, 2016. "Cooperative decision-making for the provision of a locally undesirable facility," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(1), pages 119-155, January.
    10. Feser, Daniel & Runst, Petrik, 2015. "Energy efficiency consultants as change agents? Examining the reasons for EECs’ limited success," ifh Working Papers 1 (2015), Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh).
    11. Liu, Duan & Yu, Nizhou & Wan, Hong, 2022. "Does water rights trading affect corporate investment? The role of resource allocation and risk mitigation channels," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    12. Hausknost, Daniel & Grima, Nelson & Singh, Simron Jit, 2017. "The political dimensions of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): Cascade or stairway?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 109-118.
    13. Kurtis Swope & Ryan Wielgus & Pamela Schmitt & John Cadigan, 2011. "Contracts, Behavior, and the Land-assembly Problem: An Experimental Study," Research in Experimental Economics, in: Experiments on Energy, the Environment, and Sustainability, pages 151-180, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    14. Ralph E. Townsend, 2010. "Transactions costs as an obstacle to fisheries self-governance in New Zealand," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(3), pages 301-320, July.
    15. Simon Levin & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2021. "On the Coevolution of Economic and Ecological Systems," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 355-377, October.
    16. Whitten, Stuart M. & Salzman, James & Shelton, Dave & Procter, Wendy, 2003. "Markets for ecosystem services: Applying the concepts," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 58269, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    17. Rambaud, Alexandre & Richard, Jacques, 2015. "The “Triple Depreciation Line” instead of the “Triple Bottom Line”: Towards a genuine integrated reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 92-116.
    18. Evelien Cronin & Sylvie Fosselle & Elke Rogge & Robert Home, 2021. "An Analytical Framework to Study Multi-Actor Partnerships Engaged in Interactive Innovation Processes in the Agriculture, Forestry, and Rural Development Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    19. Karsten Neuhoff, 2002. "Optimal congestion treatment for bilateral electricity trading," Working Papers EP05, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    20. Alberto Galasso & El Hadi Caoui, 2025. "Fractional Ownership and Copyright Licensing: Evidence from the Music Industry," NBER Working Papers 34336, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04391369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.