IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03841105.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Crowdsourcing innovation challenges: How participants react when their ideas are rejected

Author

Listed:
  • Cyrielle Vellera

    (TSM - Toulouse School of Management Research - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - TSM - Toulouse School of Management - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse)

  • Elodie Jouny-Rivier

    (ESSCA - School of Management, ESSCA Research Lab - ESSCA - Ecole Supérieure des Sciences Commerciales d'Angers)

  • Aurélie Hemonnet-Goujot

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU IAE - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Aix-en-Provence - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

Abstract

Although crowdsourcing challenges as tools for generating high levels of innovation have received much attention, little research has investigated the impact on participants when their submissions are rejected. This research is aimed at gaining a better understanding of the consequences of rejection for participants' relationships with the brand engaged in the crowdsourcing activity. To investigate these issues, two quantitative studies were carried out with participants whose challenge proposals had not been selected. The results highlight positive effects on participant–brand relationships, especially on brand attachment, proselytism, brand commitment and brand loyalty. A confirmatory, interview-based qualitative study then identifies managerial perspectives and marketing strategies for brands and crowdsourcing platforms following the announcement of challenge results. This paper contributes to both the co-creation and crowdsourcing literature by extending academic knowledge and provides opportunities for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Cyrielle Vellera & Elodie Jouny-Rivier & Aurélie Hemonnet-Goujot, 2023. "Crowdsourcing innovation challenges: How participants react when their ideas are rejected," Post-Print hal-03841105, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03841105
    DOI: 10.1111/caim.12528
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03841105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03841105/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/caim.12528?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hajli, Nick & Shanmugam, Mohana & Papagiannidis, Savvas & Zahay, Debra & Richard, Marie-Odile, 2017. "Branding co-creation with members of online brand communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 136-144.
    2. Ramaswamy, Venkat & Ozcan, Kerimcan, 2016. "Brand value co-creation in a digitalized world: An integrative framework and research implications," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 93-106.
    3. Aurélie Hemonnet-Goujot & Julie Fabbri & Delphine Manceau, 2016. "Crowdsourcing vs Design Thinking. Une étude comparative de deux démarches d'innovation externe dans la phase d'idéation," Post-Print hal-01412693, HAL.
    4. Matthew Thomson & Deborah J. Macinnis & C. Whan Park, 2005. "Les liens attachants : Mesurer la force de l'attachement émotionnel des consommateurs à la marque," Post-Print hal-02023559, HAL.
    5. Aurélie Hemonnet-Goujot & Julie Fabbri & Delphine Manceau, 2016. "Crowdsourcing vs Design Thinking : Une étude comparative de deux démarches d’innovation externe dans la phase d'idéation," Post-Print hal-02311884, HAL.
    6. Gebauer, Johannes & Füller, Johann & Pezzei, Roland, 2013. "The dark and the bright side of co-creation: Triggers of member behavior in online innovation communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1516-1527.
    7. Daniel Trabucchi & Laurent Muzellec & Sébastien Ronteau & Tommaso Buganza, 2021. "The platforms’ DNA: drivers of value creation in digital two-sided platforms," Post-Print hal-03718518, HAL.
    8. Salwa Hanine & Nadia Steils, 2019. "Ideation contests: Crowd management and valorization to avoid negative feelings of participants," Post-Print hal-02511039, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tajvidi, Mina & Richard, Marie-Odile & Wang, YiChuan & Hajli, Nick, 2020. "Brand co-creation through social commerce information sharing: The role of social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 476-486.
    2. Cambier, Fanny & Poncin, Ingrid, 2020. "Inferring brand integrity from marketing communications: The effects of brand transparency signals in a consumer empowerment context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 260-270.
    3. Riccardo Rialti & Lamberto Zollo & Maria Carmen Laudano & Cristiano Ciappei, 2018. "Social media brand communities and brand value co-creation: Evidences from Italy," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 111-133.
    4. Sahi, Gurjeet Kaur & Devi, Rita & Gupta, Mahesh C. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2022. "Assessing co-creation based competitive advantage through consumers’ need for differentiation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Nadeem, Waqar & Al-Imamy, Saifeddin, 2020. "Do ethics drive value co-creation on digital sharing economy platforms?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    6. Nadeem, Waqar & Juntunen, Mari & Shirazi, Farid & Hajli, Nick, 2020. "Consumers’ value co-creation in sharing economy: The role of social support, consumers’ ethical perceptions and relationship quality," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Waqar Nadeem & Mari Juntunen & Nick Hajli & Mina Tajvidi, 2021. "The Role of Ethical Perceptions in Consumers’ Participation and Value Co-creation on Sharing Economy Platforms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 421-441, March.
    8. Robson, Karen & de Beer, Jeremy & McCarthy, Ian P., 2020. "Open branding: Managing the unauthorized use of brand-related intellectual property," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 773-785.
    9. Sanjit K. Roy & Gaganpreet Singh & Corey Hatton & Bidit Dey & Nisreen Ameen & Satish Kumar, 2023. "Customers’ motives to co-create in smart services interactions," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1367-1400, September.
    10. Oriol Iglesias & Stefan Markovic & Mehdi Bagherzadeh & Jatinder Jit Singh, 2020. "Co-creation: A Key Link Between Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Trust, and Customer Loyalty," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 151-166, April.
    11. Kamboj, Shampy & Sarmah, Bijoylaxmi & Gupta, Shivam & Dwivedi, Yogesh, 2018. "Examining branding co-creation in brand communities on social media: Applying the paradigm of Stimulus-Organism-Response," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 169-185.
    12. Merz, Michael A. & Zarantonello, Lia & Grappi, Silvia, 2018. "How valuable are your customers in the brand value co-creation process? The development of a Customer Co-Creation Value (CCCV) scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 79-89.
    13. Giulia Nardelli & Marcel Broumels, 2018. "Managing Innovation Processes Through Value Co-Creation: A Process Case From Business-To-Business Service Practise," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(03), pages 1-40, April.
    14. Grant, Annetta & Weijo, Henri & Dacin, Peter A., 2023. "How institutional logics shape fairness in crowdsourcing: The case of Threadless," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 378-397.
    15. Matti Haverila & Kai Haverila & Caitlin McLaughlin & Mehak Arora, 2022. "Engagement, participation, and relationship quality in the context of co-creation in brand communities," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(3), pages 232-249, September.
    16. Sarasvuo, Sonja & Rindell, Anne & Kovalchuk, Marina, 2022. "Toward a conceptual understanding of co-creation in branding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 543-563.
    17. Renton, Michelle & Richard, James E., 2020. "Entrepreneurship in marketing: Socializing partners for brand governance in EM firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 180-188.
    18. Maud Dampérat & Florence Jeannot & Eline Jongmans & Alain Jolibert, 2019. "Modeling a cocreative process: The contributions of design and management," Post-Print hal-03710025, HAL.
    19. Anthony Okoeguale, 2023. "Brand Value Co-creation Revisited: A Critical Review of Studies," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 12, March.
    20. Kertcher, Zack & Venkatraman, Rohan & Coslor, Erica, 2020. "Pleasingly parallel: Early cross-disciplinary work for innovation diffusion across boundaries in grid computing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 581-594.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Brand relationship; Crowdsourcing;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03841105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.