IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03776653.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Aging population and agricultural sustainability issues: case of Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Şinasi Akdemir

    (Cukurova University)

  • Elpidio Kougnigan

    (Cukurova University)

  • Fersin Keskin
  • Handan Vuruş Akçaöz

    (Akdeniz University)

  • İsmet Boz
  • İlkay Kutlar

    (Akdeniz University)

  • Yann Emmanuel Sonagnon Miassi

    (Cukurova University)

  • Güsel Küsek
  • Metin Türker

Abstract

Agriculture is a sector that is widely known to be impacted not only by the natural conditions of a country but also by other economic and political sectors. Turkish agriculture, in a context marked in recent years by a rural exodus of young people, marks the vagueness of the current state of the agricultural sector and its future. It is with this in mind that this research was carried out, based on a questionnaire survey of 312 producers in 5 provinces of Turkey, to assess the impact of the ageing of the rural population on the agricultural sector. The results of this study show that with age, producers invest less in agricultural activity, altogether abandoning productions requiring more labour. The possibility of taking over the family farm by descendants plays an important role in the degree of involvement of producers. Through these findings, this study makes it possible to address targeted agricultural policies according to age stages.

Suggested Citation

  • Şinasi Akdemir & Elpidio Kougnigan & Fersin Keskin & Handan Vuruş Akçaöz & İsmet Boz & İlkay Kutlar & Yann Emmanuel Sonagnon Miassi & Güsel Küsek & Metin Türker, 2021. "Aging population and agricultural sustainability issues: case of Turkey," Post-Print hal-03776653, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03776653
    DOI: 10.30682/nm2104d
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03776653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03776653/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30682/nm2104d?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alfred M. Stiglbauer & Christoph R. Weiss, 2000. "Family and Non-Family Succession in the Upper-Austrian Farm Sector," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 54, pages 5-26.
    2. Bretford Griffin & Valentina Hartarska & Denis Nadolnyak, 2019. "Retirement Age Farmers¡¯ Exit and Disinvestment from Farming," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(12), pages 136-136, December.
    3. Uchiyama, Tomohiro & Lobley, Matt & Errington, Andrew & Yanagimura, Shunsuke, 2008. "Dimensions of Intergenerational Farm Business Transfers in Canada, England, the USA and Japan," Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics (formerly Japanese Journal of Rural Economics), Agricultural Economics Society of Japan (AESJ), vol. 10, pages 1-16.
    4. Claude Reboul, 1980. "Inflation et choix des techniques agricoles 1970-1979," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 140(1), pages 21-29.
    5. Möttönen, J. & Hettmansperger, T. P. & Oja, H. & Tienari, J., 1998. "On the Efficiency of Affine Invariant Multivariate Rank Tests," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 118-132, July.
    6. Corsi, Alessandro & Salvioni, Cristina, 2017. "Once part-timer always part-timer? Causes for persistence in off farm work state of farmers," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 6(2), September.
    7. Lin, Huamei & Wang, Houjun, 2014. "Problems of Family Farms in China and Countermeasures," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 6(06), pages 1-4, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hui Zhang & Jing Li & Tianshu Quan, 2023. "Strengthening or Weakening: The Impact of an Aging Rural Workforce on Agricultural Economic Resilience in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Wang, Jintao & Dong, Xinliang & Qiu, Rangjian & Lou, Boyuan & Tian, Liu & Chen, Pei & Zhang, Xuejia & Liu, Xiaojing & Sun, Hongyong, 2023. "Optimization of sowing date and irrigation schedule of maize in different cropping systems by APSIM for realizing grain mechanical harvesting in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zou, Baoling & Mishra, Ashok K. & Luo, Biliang, 2018. "Aging population, farm succession, and farmland usage: Evidence from rural China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 437-445.
    2. Chi Su & Richard A. Schoney & James F. Nolan, 2023. "Buy, sell or rent the farm: succession planning and the future of farming on the Great Plains," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 18(3), pages 627-669, July.
    3. Dengyan Ji & Xiaoping Shi & Xiaojuan Luo & Xianlei Ma, 2023. "The Impact of Intergenerational Inheritance on the Scale of Farmland Management in the Context of Aging: Evidence from Eastern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Elias Giannakis & Sophia Efstratoglou & Artemis Antoniades, 2018. "Off-Farm Employment and Economic Crisis: Evidence from Cyprus," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-11, March.
    5. Caihua Xu & Qian Wang & Shah Fahad & Masaru Kagatsume & Jin Yu, 2022. "Impact of Off-Farm Employment on Farmland Transfer: Insight on the Mediating Role of Agricultural Production Service Outsourcing," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Carlos Moreno-Miranda & Hipatia Palacios & Daniele Rama, 2019. "Small-holders perception of sustainability and chain coordination: evidence from Arriba PDO Cocoa in Western Ecuador," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 8(3), December.
    7. Madior Fall & Muriel Roger, 2008. "L’impact de la réforme de 1990 sur les décisions de départ à la retraite des exploitants agricoles français," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 89(4), pages 29-53.
    8. Chang, Hung-Hao & Mishra, Ashok K. & Lee, Tzong-Haw, 2019. "A supply-side analysis of agritourism: Evidence from farm-level agriculture census data in Taiwan," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(3), July.
    9. Elodie Douarin & Laure Latruffe, 2011. "Potential impact of the EU Single Area Payment on farm restructuring and efficiency in Lithuania," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 87-103.
    10. Alessandro Corsi & Vito Frontuto & Silvia Novelli, 2021. "What Drives Farm Structural Change? An Analysis of Economic, Demographic and Succession Factors," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, May.
    11. Vázquez, Ibán & Sineiro, Francisco & García, Ana Isabel, 2014. "Trayectorias de crecimiento de las explotaciones agrarias en la Cornisa Cantábrica," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 14(02), pages 1-32, December.
    12. Muhammad Abid Shahzad & Syed Abubakr & Christian Fischer, 2021. "Factors Affecting Farm Succession and Occupational Choices of Nominated Farm Successors in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Bertoni, Danilo & Cavicchioli, Daniele & Latruffe, Laure, 2016. "Impact of succession on performance: The case of the Italian family farms," 149th Seminar, October 27-28, 2016, Rennes, France 245166, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Dudek, Michał, 2016. "A matter of family? An analysis of determinants of farm succession in Polish agriculture," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(2), pages 1-7, August.
    15. Sakineh Dehghan & Mohammad Reza Faridrohani, 2019. "Affine invariant depth-based tests for the multivariate one-sample location problem," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 671-693, September.
    16. Weiss, Franz, 2006. "Bestimmungsgründe für die Aufgabe/Weiterführung landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe in Österreich," Discussion Papers DP-14-2006, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    17. Ollila, Esa & Oja, Hannu & Croux, Christophe, 2003. "The affine equivariant sign covariance matrix: asymptotic behavior and efficiencies," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 328-355, November.
    18. Vare, Minna & Weiss, Christoph R. & Pietola, Kyosti, 2005. "Should One Trust a Farmer's Succession Plan? Empirical Evidence on the Intention-Behaviour Discrepancy from Finland," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24622, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Mondal, Pronoy K. & Biswas, Munmun & Ghosh, Anil K., 2015. "On high dimensional two-sample tests based on nearest neighbors," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 168-178.
    20. Muhammad Irshad Ahmad & Les Oxley & Hengyun Ma, 2020. "What Makes Farmers Exit Farming: A Case Study of Sindh Province, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Aging farming population; Farm succession; Impact; Farming sustainability; Turkey;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03776653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.