IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03273207.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Durkheim in the Neoliberal Organization : Taking Resistance and Solidarity Seriously

Author

Listed:
  • David Courpasson

    (EM - EMLyon Business School)

  • Dima Younès
  • Michael Ivor Reed

Abstract

Durkheim's contributions to organization studies have so far been decidedly marginal, and largely concentrated on culture. In this paper, we draw upon his theory of anomie and solidarity to show how a Durkheimian view of contemporary organizations and work has special relevance today for debates about how workers, particularly middle managers, can reshuffle a capacity to resist neoliberal efforts to profoundly disrupt their working conditions, in particular their autonomy to define what is a job well done. We show how Durkheim's insights can account for the unexpected rekindling of forms of social solidarity in highly competitive and individualistic organizational settings, through dissident efforts that convey a renewal of a certain work ethos severed by neoliberal managerial policies and practices. Recent studies on resistance confirm Durkheim's view that forms of collective activity, resembling supposedly ‘old' mechanisms of former days, continue to exist and develop in contemporary societies and organizations, in response to pressure to put people in situations of inter-individual competition that disrupts social relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • David Courpasson & Dima Younès & Michael Ivor Reed, 2021. "Durkheim in the Neoliberal Organization : Taking Resistance and Solidarity Seriously," Post-Print hal-03273207, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03273207
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03273207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03273207/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fleming, Peter, 2015. "The Mythology of Work," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780745334868, September.
    2. Ricardo Azambuja & Gazi Islam, 2019. "Working at the boundaries: Middle managerial work as a source of emancipation and alienation," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01959107, HAL.
    3. Ricardo Azambuja & Gazi Islam, 2019. "Working at the boundaries: Middle managerial work as a source of emancipation and alienation," Post-Print halshs-01959107, HAL.
    4. Heather Devere & Graham M. Smith, 2010. "Friendship and Politics," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 8(3), pages 341-356, September.
    5. Damien Cahill, 2014. "The End of Laissez-Faire?," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14727.
    6. David Courpasson & Françoise Dany & Stewart Clegg, 2012. "Resisters at work : Generating productive resistance in the workplace," Post-Print hal-02312599, HAL.
    7. Fleming, Peter, 2015. "The Mythology of Work," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780745334875, July.
    8. Snyder, Benjamin, 2016. "The Disrupted Workplace: Time and the Moral Order of Flexible Capitalism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780190203504.
    9. Arianna Tassinari & Vincenzo Maccarrone, 2020. "Riders on the Storm: Workplace Solidarity among Gig Economy Couriers in Italy and the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(1), pages 35-54, February.
    10. Hugh Willmott, 2013. "‘The Substitution of One Piece of Nonsense for Another’: Reflections on Resistance, Gaming, and Subjugation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 443-473, May.
    11. David Courpasson, 2017. "The Politics of Everyday," Post-Print hal-02312016, HAL.
    12. Vanessa Beck & Paul Brook, 2020. "Solidarities In and Through Work in an Age of Extremes," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(1), pages 3-17, February.
    13. David Courpasson & Françoise Dany & Stewart Clegg, 2012. "Resisters at Work: Generating Productive Resistance in the Workplace," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 801-819, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michel Anteby & Curtis K. Chan, 2018. "A Self-Fulfilling Cycle of Coercive Surveillance: Workers’ Invisibility Practices and Managerial Justification," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 247-263, April.
    2. Jerzy Kociatkiewicz & Monika Kostera & Martin Parker, 2021. "The possibility of disalienated work: being at home in alternative organizations," Post-Print hal-02557008, HAL.
    3. Dima Younes & David Courpasson & Marie-Rachel Jacob, 2020. "Ethics from Below: Secrecy and the Maintenance of Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 451-466, May.
    4. Jean Louis Denis & Nancy Côté & Charles Fleury & Graeme Currie & Dimitrios Spyridonidis, 2021. "Global health and innovation: A panoramic view on health human resources in the COVID‐19 pandemic context," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(S1), pages 58-70, May.
    5. Stéphane Debenedetti & Isabelle Huault & Véronique Perret, 2015. "Resisting the power of organizations in Modern Times : May we all be Charlot? [Résister au pouvoir des organisations dans les Temps Modernes : Peut-on tous être Charlot ?]," Post-Print hal-01525807, HAL.
    6. Dorothy C. Suskind, 2023. "The psychopath in the corner office: A multigenre," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 135-157, January.
    7. Li Xiong, 2022. "Improvise to win: the relationship between entrepreneurial improvisation and start-up competitive advantage," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 184-204, April.
    8. Cyrille Sardais & Martin Blom & Josée Lortie, 2021. "Exit, voice, loyalty, and … disobedience: When a CEO opposes his principal," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 188-207, March.
    9. Florence Palpacuer & Amélie Seignour, 2019. "Resisting via Hybrid Spaces : The Cascade effect of a workplace Struggle against Neoliberal Hegemony," Post-Print hal-02436750, HAL.
    10. Sarpong, David & Maclean, Mairi, 2016. "Cultivating strategic foresight in practise: A relational perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2812-2820.
    11. Sarkar, Soumodip & Osiyevskyy, Oleksiy & Clegg, Stewart R., 2018. "Incumbent capability enhancement in response to radical innovations," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 353-365.
    12. Fasshauer, Ingrid, 2012. "Les interactions entre contrôle et stratégie : redéfinition du rôle des cadres intermédiaires et du levier interactif de contrôle," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/11150 edited by Berland, Nicolas.
    13. Jerzy Kociatkiewicz & Monika Kostera, 2018. "After retrotopia? The future of organizing and the thought of Zygmunt Bauman," Post-Print hal-02400973, HAL.
    14. David Courpasson & Françoise Dany & Ignasi Martí, 2016. "Organizational Entrepreneurship as Active Resistance: A Struggle against Outsourcing," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(1), pages 131-160, January.
    15. Hicham Sebti & Narjes Sassi & Benoît Gerard, 2017. "Performance des équipes temporaires: Analyse des interactions et de l'usage de la matérialité dans la construction de rôles," Post-Print hal-01907478, HAL.
    16. Ozan Nadir Alakavuklar & Fahreen Alamgir, 2018. "Ethics of Resistance in Organisations: A Conceptual Proposal," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 31-43, April.
    17. Amy L. Fraher, 2022. "Disobeying Orders’ as Responsible Leadership: Revisiting Churchill, Percival and the Fall of Singapore," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 247-263, January.
    18. Sunghee Park & Neil Lunt, 2018. "Productive Resistance within the Korean Public Sector: Exploring Organisational Culture," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 279-297, September.
    19. Jörgen Sandberg & Mats Alvesson, 2021. "Meanings of Theory: Clarifying Theory through Typification," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 487-516, March.
    20. A. Georges L. Romme, 2019. "Climbing up and down the hierarchy of accountability: implications for organization design," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    anomie; solidarity; resistance; middle managers; Durkheim; enclaves;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03273207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.