IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02854392.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impact of a grain price cut on income of crop farms : an extented partial equilibrium approach
[Impact d'une baisse du prix des céréales sur les revenus des producteurs specialisés : une approche en terme d'équilibre partiel elargi]

Author

Listed:
  • Herve Guyomard

    (ESR - Unité de recherche d'Économie et Sociologie Rurales - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Louis Pascal Mahe

    (ESR - Unité de recherche d'Économie et Sociologie Rurales - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • . Association Européenne Des Economistes Agricoles

    (AEEA Belgique - Association Européenne des Economistes Agricoles)

Abstract

L'impact d'une baisse du prix des céréales sur le revenu des producteurs spécialisés dépend en premier lieu du concept de revenu retenu et de la part de produit céréales dans ce revenu. Ainsi, dans le cas des producteurs spécialisés français (OTEX 11), l'impact d'une baisse de prix de 10% sur le surplus (mesure "statique" du revenu) est égal à-24%. Cet effet direct est atténue par les effets indirects ou effets induits (baisse du cout de la terre, baisse des prix de inputs variables). Enfin les effets tendanciels (progrès technique, effets structures) doivent être pris en compte. Au total, trois années seulement sont nécessaires pour annuler l'effet d'une baisse de 10% sur le revenu par tête : en d'autre termes, une baisse de prix de 3% est compatible avec un maintien du revenu des facteurs familiaux.

Suggested Citation

  • Herve Guyomard & Louis Pascal Mahe & . Association Européenne Des Economistes Agricoles, 1989. "Impact of a grain price cut on income of crop farms : an extented partial equilibrium approach [Impact d'une baisse du prix des céréales sur les revenus des producteurs specialisés : une approche e," Post-Print hal-02854392, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02854392
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02854392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02854392/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sakai, Yasuhiro, 1974. "Substitution and expansion effects in production theory: The case of joint production," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 255-274, November.
    2. C. Richard Shumway & Rulon D. Pope & Elizabeth K. Nash, 1984. "Allocatable Fixed Inputs and Jointness in Agricultural Production: Implications for Economic Modeling," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(1), pages 72-78.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. P. Havlík & F. Jacquet & J.M. Boisson & S. Hejduk & P. Veselý, 2006. "Mathematical programming models for agri-environmental policy analysis: A case study from the White Carpathians," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(2), pages 51-66.
    2. Giancarlo Moschini, 1988. "A Model of Production with Supply Management for the Canadian Agricultural Sector," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(2), pages 318-329.
    3. Asunka, Samuel & Shumway, C. Richard, 1996. "Allocatable Fixed Inputs And Jointness In Agricultural Production: More Implications," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 1-6, October.
    4. Aradhyula, Satheesh Venkata, 1989. "Policy structure, output supply and input demand for US crops," ISU General Staff Papers 198901010800009909, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Hertel, Thomas W., 1991. "Applied General Equilibrium Analysis of Agricultural Policies," Staff Papers 200396, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    6. Colby, Hunter & Diao, Xinshen & Somwaru, Agapi, 1999. "Sources Of Growth And Supply Response: A Cross-Commodity Analysis Of China'S Grain Sector," Bulletins 12985, University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center.
    7. Oczkowski, Eddie & Bandara, Yapa, 2013. "CGE modelling, regional economies, water buybacks," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 57(3).
    8. Wall, Charles A. & Fisher, Brian S., 1988. "Supply Response and the Theory of Production and Profit Functions," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(03), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Shumway, C. Richard, 1995. "Recent Duality Contributions In Production Economics," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Just, Richard E., 1992. "Discovering Microeconomic Relationships in Agriculture," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 146530, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    11. Yang, Dennis Tao & An, Mark Yuying, 2002. "Human capital, entrepreneurship, and farm household earnings," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 65-88, June.
    12. Guyomard, H. & Tavéra, C., 1990. "Technical change and agricultural supply-demand analysis problems of measurement and problems of interpretation," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 26.
    13. Haley, Stephen L., 1988. "Joint Products In The Swopsim Modeling Framework," Staff Reports 278136, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Jegasothy, Kandiah & Shumway, C. Richard, 1987. "Multicrop Response by Sri Lankan Peasant Farmers," 1987 Occasional Paper Series No. 4 197656, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Peichl, Andreas & Popp, Martin, 2022. "Can the Labor Demand Curve Explain Job Polarization?," IAB-Discussion Paper 202221, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    16. Moore, Michael R. & Dinar, Ariel, 1992. "Empirical Tests Of Water And Land As Quantity-Rationed Inputs In California Agriculture," Working Papers 225870, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    17. Kang, Hye-Jung & Lee, Hyunok & Sumner, Daniel A., 2003. "Heterogeneity In Production Technology Across Farm Sizes: Analysis Of Multi-Output Production Function Using Korean Farm-Level Panel Data," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22245, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Álvarez, Antonio & Roibás, David, 2006. "An Economic Model to Evaluate the Contribution of Genetics to Milk Production," Efficiency Series Papers 2006/02, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    19. Tristan Le Cotty & Anthony Aumand & Tancrêde Voituriez, 2003. "Multifonctionnalité et coopération multilatérale Une analyse du coût de fourniture de biens publics par l'agriculture," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 273(1), pages 91-102.
    20. Matthew A. Turner, 1995. "Economics without Free-disposal: Quota-induced Discarding in Heterogenous Fisheries," Working Papers mturner-95-02, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02854392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.