IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02739506.html

CMFDM: A methodology to guide the design of conceptual model of farmers’ decision-making processes

Author

Listed:
  • Marion Robert

    (AGIR - AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - Toulouse INP - Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse)

  • Alban Thomas

    (TSE-R - Toulouse School of Economics - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Jacques-Eric Bergez

    (AGIR - AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - Toulouse INP - Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse)

Abstract

The agricultural research community uses languages and approaches to model farmers' decision-making processes but does not clearly detail the steps necessary to build a decision model. We propose an original and easily applicable methodology for modelers to guide data acquisition and analysis, incorporate expert knowledge, and conceptualize decision-making processes in farming systems. It combines decision-making analysis with a modeling approach inspired by cognitive sciences and software-development methods. It is organized into four steps:1)Problem Definition Specify the context and the initial research question. Chose the type of data to collect. 2)Case Study Selection Select case studies based on theoretical sampling approach to search for diversity instead of representativeness. 3)Data Collection and Analysis of Individual Case Studies Collect preliminary knowledge on the context domain. Select appropriate knowledge representations for the task. Use critical decision method to collect farmer's knowledge and identify critical incidents disrupting farming management. Present an initial transcription of the knowledge collected to the farmer for verification, refinement, revision. Represent farmers' knowledge with UML diagrams.4)The Generic Conceptual Model List similarities and differences between individual analysis and UML graphs. Use literature, experts and modelers to strengthen development of the generic model by formulating and adding complex concepts. Format the generic conceptual model with UML graphs.We applied the methodology to two research questions on water management, one in adeveloped country (France) and one in an emerging country (India). This methodology can be used in different contexts and will be a useful tool to guide modelers in building decision model in farming system

Suggested Citation

  • Marion Robert & Alban Thomas & Jacques-Eric Bergez, 2016. "CMFDM: A methodology to guide the design of conceptual model of farmers’ decision-making processes," Post-Print hal-02739506, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02739506
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02739506v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02739506v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baccar, Mariem & Raynal, Hélène & Sekhar, Muddu & Bergez, Jacques-Eric & Willaume, Magali & Casel, Pierre & Giriraj, P. & Murthy, Sanjeeva & Ruiz, Laurent, 2023. "Dynamics of crop category choices reveal strategies and tactics used by smallholder farmers in India to cope with unreliable water availability," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Novotny, Ivan P. & Boul Lefeuvre, Nastasia & Attiogbé, Koffi S. & Wouyo, Atakpama & Fousseni, Folega & Dray, Anne & Waeber, Patrick O., 2024. "Exploring farmer choices in Southern Togo: Utilizing a strategy game to understand decision-making in agricultural practices," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    3. Jahel, C. & Augusseau, X. & Lo Seen, D., 2018. "Modelling cropping plan strategies: What decision margin for farmers in Burkina Faso?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 17-33.
    4. Bakker, Craig & Zaitchik, Benjamin F. & Siddiqui, Sauleh & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Broaddus, Elena & Neff, Roni A. & Haskett, Jonathan & Parker, Cindy L., 2018. "Shocks, seasonality, and disaggregation: Modelling food security through the integration of agricultural, transportation, and economic systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 165-184.
    5. Robert, Marion & Thomas, Alban & Sekhar, Muddu & Badiger, Shrinivas & Ruiz, Laurent & Raynal, Hélène & Bergez, Jacques-Eric, 2017. "Adaptive and dynamic decision-making processes: A conceptual model of production systems on Indian farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 279-291.
    6. Madende, Primrose & Grové, Bennie, 2019. "Risk efficiency of optimal water allocation within a single- and multi-stage decision-making framework," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 59(01), August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02739506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.