IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01950062.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Acceptabilité des relocalisations des biens face à l’élévation du niveau de la mer : perceptions de nouveaux dispositifs de gouvernance du foncier

Author

Listed:
  • Helene Rey-Valette

    (CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - FRE2010 - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UM - Université de Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier)

  • Marie-Laure Lambert

    (LIEU - Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire En Urbanisme - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Gisèle Vianey

    (UT - Université de Tours)

  • Bénédicte Rulleau

    (UR ETBX - Environnement, territoires et infrastructures - IRSTEA - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture)

  • Camille Andre

    (EID - Entente Interdépartementale pour la démoustication du littoral méditerranéen)

  • Nicole Lautredou-Audouy

    (CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - FRE2010 - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UM - Université de Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier)

Abstract

Face aux risques d'érosion littorale et de submersion marine aggravés par l'élévation du niveau de la mer, de nouvelles mesures, visant à réduire la vulnérabilité des économies littorales par la relocalisation des biens les plus exposés, sont préconisées. Cependant, elles font face à de fortes oppositions, tant des propriétaires concernés que des élus locaux. À partir d'une enquête menée auprès de 421 résidents principaux et secondaires de la commune d'Hyères-les-Palmiers, cet article présente la diversité des perceptions des mesures de relocalisation de façon à analyser les déterminants de leur acceptabilité. Compte tenu de l'importance des contraintes foncières et financières, il étudie notamment la faisabilité de plusieurs procédures de rachat progressif des biens exposés et la capacité de ces dispositifs à renforcer l'acceptabilité des mesures de relocalisation*−−*Faced with the menace of coastal erosion and flooding increased by sea level rise, new measures have been put forward that aim to reduce the vulnerability of coastal economies through relocation of property most at risk. These measures have however come up against strong opposition both from land owners and local politicians. From a survey of 421 main and second-home owners in the community of Hyères-les-Palmiers (Var, France), this article presents the range of perceptions of relocation measures in order to analyze the deciding factors in acceptability. Given the importance of land constraints, the article focuses on the feasibility of several schemes for gradually repurchasing property at risk and their ability to strengthen acceptance of relocation measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Helene Rey-Valette & Marie-Laure Lambert & Gisèle Vianey & Bénédicte Rulleau & Camille Andre & Nicole Lautredou-Audouy, 2018. "Acceptabilité des relocalisations des biens face à l’élévation du niveau de la mer : perceptions de nouveaux dispositifs de gouvernance du foncier," Post-Print hal-01950062, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01950062
    DOI: 10.3166/ges.2018.0005
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-01950062v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-01950062v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3166/ges.2018.0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Peretti-Watel, 2005. "La culture du risque, ses marqueurs sociaux et ses paradoxes. Une exploration empirique," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 56(2), pages 371-392.
    2. Glenk, Klaus & Fischer, Anke, 2010. "Insurance, prevention or just wait and see? Public preferences for water management strategies in the context of climate change," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 2279-2291, September.
    3. Miyuki Hino & Christopher B. Field & Katharine J. Mach, 2017. "Managed retreat as a response to natural hazard risk," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(5), pages 364-370, May.
    4. Duxbury, Jane & Dickinson, Sarah, 2007. "Principles for sustainable governance of the coastal zone: In the context of coastal disasters," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2-3), pages 319-330, August.
    5. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    6. Bagstad, Kenneth J. & Stapleton, Kevin & D'Agostino, John R., 2007. "Taxes, subsidies, and insurance as drivers of United States coastal development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2-3), pages 285-298, August.
    7. Du, Xiaoxue & Ye, Fanglin, 2018. "Adaptation to Climate Change: the Role of Crop Insurance," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274373, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Hélène Rey-Valette & Bénédicte Rulleau & Anne-Peggy Hellequin & Catherine Meur-Ferec & Hervé Flanquart, 2014. "Second-home owners and sea-level rise: the case of the Languedoc- Roussillon region (France)," Post-Print hal-01521722, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angela Mallette & Timothy F. Smith & Carmen Elrick-Barr & Jessica Blythe & Ryan Plummer, 2021. "Understanding Preferences for Coastal Climate Change Adaptation: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Mohammad Sirajul Islam & Mohammad Shamsuddoha, 2023. "Assessing Sustainability Governance and Its Dimensions," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 12(2), pages 158-175, June.
    3. Henri A. Schildt & Markku V.J. Maula & Thomas Keil, 2005. "Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 493-515, July.
    4. Giuliani, Elisa & Martinelli, Arianna & Rabellotti, Roberta, 2016. "Is Co-Invention Expediting Technological Catch Up? A Study of Collaboration between Emerging Country Firms and EU Inventors," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 192-205.
    5. Insoo Cho & Peter F. Orazem, 2021. "How endogenous risk preferences and sample selection affect analysis of firm survival," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1309-1332, April.
    6. Son K. Lam & Thomas E. DeCarlo & Ashish Sharma, 2019. "Salesperson ambidexterity in customer engagement: do customer base characteristics matter?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 659-680, July.
    7. Bruneel, Johan & Clarysse, Bart & Bobelyn, Annelies & Wright, Mike, 2020. "Liquidity events and VC-backed academic spin-offs: The role of search alliances," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(10).
    8. Anne Corcos & Yorgos Rizopoulos, 2011. "Is prosocial behavior egocentric? The “invisible hand” of emotions," Post-Print halshs-01968213, HAL.
    9. Freeman, Steven F., 1997. "Good decisions : reconciling human rationality, evolution, and ethics," Working papers WP 3962-97., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    10. Zhang, Feng & Jiang, Guohua & Cantwell, John A., 2015. "Subsidiary exploration and the innovative performance of large multinational corporations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 224-234.
    11. Liu, Zhiqiang & Yan, Miao & Fan, Youqing & Chen, Liling, 2021. "Ascribed or achieved? The role of birth order on innovative behaviour in the workplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 480-492.
    12. Boeker, Warren & Howard, Michael D. & Basu, Sandip & Sahaym, Arvin, 2021. "Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 495-507.
    13. Keegan, A. & Turner, J.R., 2000. "Quantity versus Quality in Project Based Learning Practices," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2000-55-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    14. Carolina Rojas-Córdova & Amanda J. Williamson & Julio A. Pertuze & Gustavo Calvo, 2023. "Why one strategy does not fit all: a systematic review on exploration–exploitation in different organizational archetypes," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2251-2295, October.
    15. Robert P. Garrett Jr. & Jeffrey G. Covin, 2015. "Internal Corporate Venture Operations Independence and Performance: A Knowledge–Based Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(4), pages 763-790, July.
    16. Marco Valeri & Rodolfo Baggio, 2021. "A critical reflection on the adoption of blockchain in tourism," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 121-132, June.
    17. Sarv Devaraj & Robert F. Easley & J. Michael Crant, 2008. "Research Note ---How Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-Factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 93-105, March.
    18. Daniel Reimsbach & Bastian Hauschild, 2012. "Corporate venturing: an extended typology," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 71-80, September.
    19. Li, Mingxiang, 2021. "Exploring novel technologies through board interlocks: Spillover vs. broad exploration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    20. Sadovnikova, Anna & Pujari, Ashish & Mikhailitchenko, Andrey, 2016. "Radical innovation in strategic partnerships: A framework for analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1829-1833.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01950062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.