IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01146742.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le système financier français face à ses missions d'intérêt général : le choix d'une internalisation par les établissements privés

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Rey

    (CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - USPC - Université Sorbonne Paris Cité - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

L'auteur analyse les missions d'intérêt général du système financier français en précisant notamment l'évolution du cadre juridique qui les définit. Elle réalise également un état des lieux du système financier public, depuis le programme de privatisation du secteur financier concurrentiel engagé après 1986. Elle montre que l'Etat a une forte légitimité à intervenir dans le système financier afin d'assurer le développement économique et social du pays et en garantir le financement, pour contribuer à l'ajustement optimal des comportements des agents économiques et la stabilité du système. Cette intervention s'exerce par des missions d'intérêt général telles que le droit au compte, la lutte contre l'exclusion bancaire, l'accès au crédit des petites et moyennes entreprises, le développement des activités de prêts à caractère d'intérêt collectif. L'intervention peut se faire directement par le biais des opérateurs publics et, indirectement par la législation, la régulation et le contrôle. En France, l'Etat contrôle et supervise indirectement le système financier au travers de deux établissements indépendants, l'ACPR et l'AMF, adossés à la Banque de France auxquels il a confié des missions de protection, de contrôle et de régulation. Le désengagement progressif de l'Etat français en tant qu'actionnaire a conduit à un très fort repli du secteur public qui est aujourd'hui constitué pour l'essentiel de trois établissements, la Banque Postale, la Banque Publique d'Investissement et la Caisse des Dépôts et Consignation. Les pouvoirs publics français ont ainsi fait le choix de faire reposer principalement pour ne pas dire essentiellement l'internalisation des missions publiques sur les établissements privés : le système financier français est désormais dominé par un secteur privé contrôlé et régulé par des autorités publiques indépendantes.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Rey, 2015. "Le système financier français face à ses missions d'intérêt général : le choix d'une internalisation par les établissements privés," Post-Print hal-01146742, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01146742
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01146742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01146742/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathalie Rey, 2012. "États et Systèmes financiers européens : une relation biaisée," Post-Print halshs-00697323, HAL.
    2. Micco, Alejandro & Panizza, Ugo & Yanez, Monica, 2007. "Bank ownership and performance. Does politics matter?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 219-241, January.
    3. Andrianova, Svetlana, 2012. "Public banks and financial stability," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 86-88.
    4. Brei, Michael & Schclarek, Alfredo, 2013. "Public bank lending in times of crisis," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 820-830.
    5. Iannotta, Giuliano & Nocera, Giacomo & Sironi, Andrea, 2007. "Ownership structure, risk and performance in the European banking industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 2127-2149, July.
    6. Duprey, T., 2012. "Bank Ownership and Credit Cycle: the lower sensitivity of public bank lending to the business cycle," Working papers 411, Banque de France.
    7. Thibaut Duprey, 2013. "Bank Ownership and Credit Cycle: the lower sensitivity of public bank lending to the business cycle," Working Papers halshs-00829474, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denis Davydov, 2018. "Does State Ownership of Banks Matter?," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 17(2), pages 250-285, August.
    2. Chen, Yan-Shing & Chen, Yehning & Lin, Chih-Yung & Sharma, Zenu, 2016. "Is there a bright side to government banks? Evidence from the global financial crisis," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 128-143.
    3. Elisabeth Paulet & Francesc Relano, 2018. "Chinese banking reforms in perspective: towards global alignment or national specificity?," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 294-311, May.
    4. Emilios Galariotis & Iordanis Kalaitzoglou & Jacek Niklewski & Constantin Zopounidis, 2021. "Optimal level of state ownership in banks: prevention measure versus emergency action—evidence from the new millennia," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 165-197, September.
    5. Fotak, Veljko & Lee, Haekwon, 2020. "Public-private co-lending: Evidence from syndicated corporate loans," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Ho, Po-Hsin & Chen, Hung-Kun & Lin, Chih-Yung & Chi, Che-Wei, 2016. "Does monitoring by the media improve the performance of government banks?," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 76-87.
    7. Ping‐Lun Tseng & Wen‐Chung Guo, 2022. "Bank risk‐taking in a mixed duopoly: The role of the state‐owned bank," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 22(4), pages 688-724, December.
    8. Kanga, Désiré & Murinde, Victor & Soumaré, Issouf, 2020. "Capital, risk and profitability of WAEMU banks: Does bank ownership matter?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    9. Brijesh K Mishra & L. V. Ramana, 2018. "Does Ownership Structure Influence Bank Performance?: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 17(2_suppl), pages 282-297, August.
    10. Martins, António Miguel & Serra, Ana Paula & Stevenson, Simon, 2019. "Determinants of real estate bank profitability," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 282-300.
    11. Ugo Panizza, 2023. "State-owned commercial banks," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 44-66, January.
    12. Westman, Hanna, 2011. "The impact of management and board ownership on profitability in banks with different strategies," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 3300-3318.
    13. Vuslat Us, 2015. "The Turkish Banking Sector Before and After the Global Crisis:An Ownership Breakdown," CBT Research Notes in Economics 1502, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
    14. Fredriksson, Antti & Moro, Andrea, 2014. "Bank–SMEs relationships and banks’ risk-adjusted profitability," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 67-77.
    15. Robin, Iftekhar & Salim, Ruhul & Bloch, Harry, 2018. "Financial performance of commercial banks in the post-reform era: Further evidence from Bangladesh," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 43-54.
    16. Cheng, Maoyong & Geng, Hongyan & Zhang, Junrui, 2016. "Chinese commercial banks: Benefits from foreign strategic investors?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(PA), pages 147-172.
    17. Ilduara Busta & Evis Sinani & Steen Thomsen, 2014. "Ownership concentration and market value of European banks," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(1), pages 159-183, February.
    18. Haque, Faizul & Brown, Kym, 2017. "Bank ownership, regulation and efficiency: Perspectives from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 273-293.
    19. Doan, Anh-Tuan & Lin, Kun-Li, 2022. "Bank ownership and stock price informativeness. Does politics matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    20. Emanuele BACCHIOCCHI & Matteo FERRARI & Massimo FLORIO & Daniela VANDONE, 2015. "State-Owned Banks: Acquirers in M&A deals," Departmental Working Papers 2015-08, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01146742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.