IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/guc/wpaper/15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The US-China Trade Conflict: A Game Theoretical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hebatallah Ghoneim

    (Faculty of Management Technology, The German University in Cairo)

  • Yasmine Reda

    (Faculty of Management Technology, The German University in Cairo)

Abstract

Game Theory has been gaining great importance in Economics, encouraging research in many theoretical and applied fields. This paper relies on simple game theory tools to set up a major international trade dispute. Using the backward deduction approach, the strategies of the United States and China in their recent trade conflict are analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hebatallah Ghoneim & Yasmine Reda, 2008. "The US-China Trade Conflict: A Game Theoretical Analysis," Working Papers 15, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    • Handle: RePEc:guc:wpaper:15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://mgt.guc.edu.eg/wpapers/015ghoneim_reda2008.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2008
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mylène Kherallah & John Beghin, 1998. "U.S. Trade Threats: Rhetoric or War?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 80(1), pages 15-29.
    2. Larry S. Karp & Alex F. McCalla, 1983. "Dynamic Games and International Trade: An Application to the World Corn Market," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(4), pages 641-650.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Killion, M. Ulric, 2009. "Relation of game theory to economic history and marginalism," MPRA Paper 13378, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanzetti, David & Kennedy, John O.S., 1989. "Optimal Retaliation in International Commodity Markets," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 57(01-02-03), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Seitzinger, Ann Hillberg & Paarlberg, Philip L., 1989. "A Survey of Theoretical and Empirical Literature Related to Export Assistance," Staff Reports 278240, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Bown, Chad P., 2004. "Trade disputes and the implementation of protection under the GATT: an empirical assessment," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 263-294, March.
    4. Gilmour, Brad & Fawcett, Peter, 1986. "The Relationship Between American and Canadian Wheat Prices," Working Papers 243885, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    5. Daniel H. Pick & Timothy A. Park, 1991. "The Competitive Structure of U.S. Agricultural Exports," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(1), pages 133-141.
    6. Thornsbury, Suzanne, 1999. "Political Economy Determinants Of Technical Barriers To U.S. Agricultural Exports," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21499, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Gardner, George R. & Skully, Davide W., 1986. "The Conduct Of Wheat Marketing In North Africa," Staff Reports 277903, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Lee, Dae-Seob & Kennedy, P. Lynn, 2002. "A Game Theoretic Analysis Of U.S. Rice Export Policy: The Case Of Japan And Korea," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19686, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. H. Alan Love & Endah Murniningtyas, 1992. "Measuring the Degree of Market Power Exerted by Government Trade Agencies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(3), pages 546-555.
    10. John C. Beghin & Heidi Schweizer, 2021. "Agricultural Trade Costs," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 500-530, June.
    11. Karp, Larry, 1986. "Risk Aversion in a Dynamic Trading Game," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt5tm7k8ss, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    12. Thursby, Marie C. & Thursby, Jerry G., 1991. "Strategic Trade Theory and Agricultural Markets: An Application to Canadian and U.S. Wheat Exports to Japan," Occasional Papers 233062, Regional Research Project NC-194: Organization and Performance of World Food Systems.
    13. Chang, Ching-Cheng & Stefanou, Spiro E., 1987. "Supply Growth And Dairy Industry Deregulation," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, April.
    14. Bai, Yun & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Pang, Jong-Shi, 2012. "Biofuel supply chain design under competitive agricultural land use and feedstock market equilibrium," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1623-1633.
    15. Anania, Giovanni, 2003. "Gains from trade liberalization with imperfectly competitive world markets. A note," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 3(06), pages 1-15.
    16. John K. Horowitz & Richard E. Just & Sinaia Netanyahu, 1996. "Potential Benefits and Limitations of Game Theory in Agricultural Economics," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(3), pages 753-760.
    17. Margherita Scoppola, 1993. "Trade policies and the strategies of multinationals in the international grain market," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(3), pages 189-204.
    18. Patterson, Paul M & Abbott, Philip C, 1994. "Further Evidence on Competition in the US Grain Export Trade," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 429-437, December.
    19. Thornsbury, Suzanne & Roberts, Donna & Orden, David, 2004. "Measurement and Political Economy of Disputed Technical Regulations," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(3), pages 559-574, December.
    20. Prentice, Barry E. & Tyrchniewicz, E. W., 1986. "Agricultural Countertrade: Perspectives, Economics, and Canadian Commercial Policy," Working Papers 243999, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Trade Conflict; Exchange Rate Policy; Game Theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions
    • C7 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:guc:wpaper:15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr.Dina Yousri (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmguceg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.