IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gtr/gatrjs/gjbssr675.html

Cultural Codification and Patriarchal Gridlock: A Comparative Study of Longevity in Japanese and Indian Family Businesses

Author

Listed:
  • K Ullas Kamat

    (Justice K.S. Hegde Institute of Management, NITTE University, 574110, Mangalore, India Author-2-Name: Dr. A.P Achar Author-2-Workplace-Name: Justice K.S. Hegde Institute of Management, NITTE University, 574110, Mangalore, India Author-3-Name: Author-3-Workplace-Name: Author-4-Name: Neelesh G Jain Author-4-Workplace-Name: UK & Co, Grace Towers, Vasanth Nagar, 560052, Bangalore, India Author-5-Name: Author-5-Workplace-Name: Author-6-Name: Author-6-Workplace-Name: Author-7-Name: Author-7-Workplace-Name: Author-8-Name: Author-8-Workplace-Name:)

Abstract

" Objective - This study examines why Japanese family businesses outlast their Indian counterparts, using cultural, legal, and governance frameworks. Methodology - Analyzing Japan's i.e., system—emphasizing adult adoption and tax incentives—against India's Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) laws, findings reveal Japan's meritocratic governance reduces succession delays (4 vs. 18 months) and equity fragmentation. Findings - Case studies (Suzuki, Bajaj Auto) demonstrate Japan's institutional resilience versus India's patriarchal gridlock. Recommendations propose legal reforms for non-biological succession, gender-inclusive policies, and digital governance tools, offering a model for emerging economies to enhance the longevity of family businesses. Type of Paper - Empirical"

Suggested Citation

  • K Ullas Kamat, 2026. "Cultural Codification and Patriarchal Gridlock: A Comparative Study of Longevity in Japanese and Indian Family Businesses," GATR Journals gjbssr675, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    • Handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:gjbssr675
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35609/gjbssr.2026.14.1(3)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/GJBSSR/pdf_files/GJBSSRVol14(1)2026/3.K%20Ullas%20Kamat.pdf
    Download Restriction: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/online_submission.html
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.35609/gjbssr.2026.14.1(3)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pollak, Robert A, 1985. "A Transaction Cost Approach to Families and Households," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 23(2), pages 581-608, June.
    2. Mehrotra, Vikas & Morck, Randall & Shim, Jungwook & Wiwattanakantang, Yupana, 2013. "Adoptive expectations: Rising sons in Japanese family firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(3), pages 840-854.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maximiliano González & Alexander Guzmán & Eduardo Pablo & María Andrea Trujillo, 2020. "Does gender really matter in the boardroom? Evidence from closely held family firms," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 221-267, February.
    2. Pavel Ciaian & d'Artis Kancs & Jan Pokrivcak, 2008. "Comparative Advantages, Transaction Costs and Factor Content of Agricultural Trade: Empirical Evidence from the CEE," EERI Research Paper Series EERI_RP_2008_03, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    3. Ahrens, Jan-Philipp & Landmann, Andreas & Woywode, Michael, 2015. "Gender preferences in the CEO successions of family firms: Family characteristics and human capital of the successor," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 86-103.
    4. J. Michael Collins & Elizabeth Odders-White, 2021. "Allowances: Incidence in the US and Relationship to Financial Capability in Young Adulthood," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 533-544, September.
    5. Chaddad, Fabio & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2017. "Agency costs and organizational architecture of large corporate farms: evidence from Brazil," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 201-220.
    6. Pareena G. Lawrence & Marakah Mancini, 2008. "La toma de decisiones de los hogares en Venezuela," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 10(18), pages 213-239, January-J.
    7. Elissa Braunstein & Nancy Folbre, 2001. "To Honor and Obey: Efficiency, Inequality, and Patriarchal Property Rights," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 25-44.
    8. Viitanen, Tarja K., 2014. "The divorce revolution and generalized trust: Evidence from the United States 1973–2010," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 25-32.
    9. Pilar López-Delgado & Julio Diéguez-Soto & María J. Martínez-Romero & Teresa Mariño-Garrido, 2024. "Acquisition activity: do firm age and family control matter?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 14(2), pages 447-473, June.
    10. Kulic, Nevena, 2013. "The type and duration of family unions and income sharing: The implications for women's economic well-being," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 7-15.
    11. Johan F. M. Swinnen & Liesbeth Dries & Karen Macours, 2005. "Transition and agricultural labor," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(1), pages 15-34, January.
    12. Rafael Barrera Gutiérrez, 2011. "El vacío institucional en el modelo de elección racional aplicado a la fecundidad," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 13(25), pages 223-248, July-Dece.
    13. Robert Fleck & F. Hanssen, 2009. "“Rulers ruled by women”: an economic analysis of the rise and fall of women’s rights in ancient Sparta," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 221-245, July.
    14. Guido Corbetta & Carlo Salvato, 2004. "Self–Serving or Self–Actualizing? Models of Man and Agency Costs in Different Types of Family Firms: A Commentary on “Comparing the Agency Costs of Family and Non–family Firms: Conceptual Issues and Exploratory Evidenceâ€," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 28(4), pages 355-362, July.
    15. Matthew Painter & Jonathan Vespa, 2012. "The Role of Cohabitation in Asset and Debt Accumulation During Marriage," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 491-506, December.
    16. Liu, Qigui & Luo, Tianpei & Tian, Gary Gang, 2015. "Family control and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 220-245.
    17. Davidova, Sophia & Thomson, Kenneth J, "undated". "Family Farming in the Enlarged EU: Concepts, challenges and prospects," 142nd Seminar, May 29-30, 2014, Budapest, Hungary 170155, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Patricia Apps & Ray Rees, 2011. "Relational Contracts, Taxation and the Household," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 57(2), pages 245-258, June.
    19. Matyukha, Andriy, 2017. "Business groups in agriculture impact of ownership structures on performance: The case of Russia's agroholdings," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies 254051, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    20. Kubo, Katsuyuki & Kiriu, Takuya & Uchigasaki, Shigeru & Seko, Susumu & Yamauchi, Hiroaki, 2025. "CEO skill and firm performance," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Z1 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:gjbssr675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Dr. Abd Rahim Mohamad (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://gatrenterprise.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.